<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vetpress</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Аграрная наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Agrarian science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-8155</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-701X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Редакция журнала "Аграрная наука"</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32634/0869-8155-2022-363-10-154-161</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vetpress-2332</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Развитие аграрной кооперации в современных условиях среды: эвристический потенциал междисциплинарных научных исследований</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Development of agrarian cooperation in modern environmental conditions: heuristic potential of interdisciplinary scientific research</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-8487</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Головина</surname><given-names>С. Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Golovina</surname><given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник,</p><p>42, ул. Карла Либкнехта, г. Екатеринбург, 620075</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher,</p><p>42 Karl Liebknecht str., 620075</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">s_golovina@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-3080</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ручкин</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ruchkin</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат социологических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры менеджмента и экономической теории,</p><p>2, ул. Карла Либкнехта, г. Екатеринбург, 620075</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Management and Economic Theory Department,</p><p>42 Karl Liebknecht str., 620075, Yekaterinburg</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">alexeyruchkin87@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Уральский государственный аграрный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ural State Agrarian University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>154</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Головина С.Г., Ручкин А.В., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Головина С.Г., Ручкин А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Golovina S.G., Ruchkin A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vetpress.ru/jour/article/view/2332">https://www.vetpress.ru/jour/article/view/2332</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Актуальность</title><p>Актуальность. Актуальность исследования, результаты которого представлены в данной статье, обусловлена возросшей потребностью в обзоре и систематизации результатов современных научных изысканий в области сельскохозяйственной кооперации, которые, с одной стороны, отражают сложившиеся в мировой практике тенденции и проблемы развития аграрных кооперативов, с другой — обладают эвристической и практической значимостью для улучшения условий развития кооперации непосредственно в российских условиях среды (причем, с учетом ее современного состояния и имеющих место вызовов и угроз).</p><p>Методы, использованные в ходе исследования, в частности, интегративный и дискурсивный методы, обзорно-аналитические приемы, скрупулезные компаративные оценки новых (полученных в анализируемых работах) выводов и заключений, позволили тщательно отследить и строго соотнести такие аспекты исследований, как (1) сложности, с которыми сталкиваются кооперативы из-за ухудшения политической и макроэкономической обстановки, отрицательных следствий изменения климата, возникающих в последнее время биологических (и других) угроз, (2) теоретическое обоснование причин снижения эффективности деятельности кооперативов в связи с существующими флуктуациями в условиях их функционирования, (3) практические выходы, предлагаемые учеными в свете современных междисциплинарных исследований изучаемого феномена (сельскохозяйственной кооперации).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. В качестве результата обзорно- аналитической работы, предпринятой для достижения обозначенной цели (обобщение и систематизация существующих концепций функционирования аграрных кооперативов, выявление их эвристического потенциала для использования в процессе разработки алгоритма и механизмов внедрения в российскую практику бизнес-ориентированных и социально направленных моделей сельскохозяйственных кооперативов), следует обозначить выделение публикаций тех авторов, которые стремятся (1) найти новые подходы к сохранению уникальной кооперативной организации, с одной стороны, и нахождению адекватного ответа на глобальные изменения в обществе и экономике — с другой, (2) развивать теорию сельскохозяйственной кооперации с учетом ряда обстоятельств, которые еще несколько лет назад не определялись как заслуживающие внимания, а сегодня рассматриваются в качестве решающих для развития многих социально-экономических процессов (коронакризис, внешнеэкономические санкции, кардинальное нарушение технологических и логистических цепочек), (3) ориентировать сугубо фундаментальные исследования на решение неотложных (прикладных) задач в сфере сельхозкооперации. </p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Relevance</title><p>Relevance. The relevance of the study, the results of which are presented in this article, is due to the increased need to review and systematize the results of modern scientific research in the field of agricultural cooperation, which, on the one hand, reflect the trends and problems of development of agricultural cooperatives that have developed in world practice, on the other hand, have a heuristic and practical significance for improving the conditions for the development of cooperation directly in the Russian environment (moreover, taking into account its current state and existing challenges and threats).</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Methods. The methods used in the course of the study, in particular, integrative and discursive methods, review and analytical techniques, rigorous comparative assessments of new (obtained in the analyzed works) conclusions, made it possible to carefully monitor and strictly correlate such research aspects as (1) struggles faced by cooperatives due to the deterioration of the political and macroeconomic environment, the negative consequences of climate change, emerging biological (and other) threats, (2) a theoretical justification for the reasons for the decrease in the efficiency of cooperatives due to existing fluctuations in the conditions of their functioning, ( 3) practical solutions offered by scientists in the light of modern interdisciplinary research of the phenomenon under study (agricultural cooperation).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. As a result of the review and analytical work undertaken to achieve the stated goal (generalization and systematization of existing concepts of the functioning of agricultural cooperatives, identification of their heuristic potential for use in the process of developing an algorithm and mechanisms for introducing business and socially-oriented models of agricultural cooperatives into Russian practice), it is necessary to highlight the publications of those authors who seek (1) to find new approaches to preserving the unique cooperative organization, on the one hand, and finding an adequate response to global changes in society and the economy, on the other, (2) to develop the theory of agricultural cooperation, taking into account a number of circumstances that a few years ago were not defined as worthy of attention, but today are considered as decisive for the development of many socio-economic processes (coronacrisis, foreign economic sanctions, a fundamental violation of technological and logistic chains), (3) to focus purely fundamental research on solving urgent (applied) problems in the field of agricultural cooperation. </p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>сельскохозяйственные кооперативы</kwd><kwd>теория</kwd><kwd>обзор</kwd><kwd>институциональная среда</kwd><kwd>бизнес-ориентированные модели</kwd><kwd>социальная направленность</kwd><kwd>вызовы</kwd><kwd>угрозы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>agricultural cooperatives</kwd><kwd>theory</kwd><kwd>review</kwd><kwd>institutional environment</kwd><kwd>business-oriented models</kwd><kwd>social orientation</kwd><kwd>challenges</kwd><kwd>threats</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РНФ и Правительства Свердловской области в рамках научного проекта №22-28-20048.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Палладина М.И., Воронина Н.П. Сельскохозяйственные потребительские кооперативы: правовые вопросы. Черные дыры в Российском законодательстве. 2014; 1: 53-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palladina M.I., Voronina N.P. Agricultural consumer cooperatives: legal issues. Black holes in Russian legislation. 2014; 1:53-58 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Божков О.Б., Никулин А.М., Полещук И.К. Сельская кооперация в Северном Нечерноземье: официальные и неформальные практики. Вестник российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: социология. 2020; 20 (4): 889-904.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bozhkov O.B., Nikulin A.M., Poleshchuk I.K. Rural cooperation in the Northern Non-Chernozem region: official and informal practices. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: sociology. 2020; 20 (4): 889-904 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deng W., Hendrikse G., Liang Q. Internal Social Capital and the Life Cycle of Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2021; 31 (1): 1-23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deng W., Hendrikse G., Liang Q. Internal Social Capital and the Life Cycle of Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2021; 31 (1): 1-23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mwambi M., Bijman J., Mshenga P. Which Type of Producer Organization is (More) Inclusive? Dynamics of Farmers’ Membership and Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (2): 213-236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mwambi M., Bijman J., Mshenga P. Which Type of Producer Organization is (More) Inclusive? Dynamics of Farmers’ Membership and Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (2): 213-236.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Diaz-Foncea M., Marcuello C. Entrepreneurs and the Context of Cooperative Organizations: A Definition of Cooperative Entrepreneur. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration. 2013; 30: 238-251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Diaz-Foncea M., Marcuello C. Entrepreneurs and the Context of Cooperative Organizations: A Definition of Cooperative Entrepreneur. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration. 2013; 30: 238-251.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grashuis J., Cook M. Farmer Cooperatives as Systems of Attributes: An Analysis of Ownership and Investment Complementarities. In: Management and Governance of Networks: Franchising, Cooperatives, and Strategic Alliances. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2017: 131-147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grashuis J., Cook M. Farmer Cooperatives as Systems of Attributes: An Analysis of Ownership and Investment Complementarities. In: Management and Governance of Networks: Franchising, Cooperatives, and Strategic Alliances. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2017: 131-147.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bacq S., Lumpkin G.T. Social Entrepreneurship and COVID‐19. Journal of Management Studies. 2020; 58: 285-288.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bacq S., Lumpkin G.T. Social Entrepreneurship and COVID‐19. Journal of Management Studies. 2020; 58: 285-288.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fahlbeck E., Nilsson J. The Marketing of Organic Food Products: The Case of Swedish Dairy Co-operatives. In: Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change Theories and Policies for European Agriculture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002; 2002: 345-361.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fahlbeck E., Nilsson J. The Marketing of Organic Food Products: The Case of Swedish Dairy Co-operatives. In: Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change Theories and Policies for European Agriculture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002; 2002: 345-361.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bijman J. Exploring the Sustainability of the Cooperative Model in Dairy: The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (7): 2498.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bijman J. Exploring the Sustainability of the Cooperative Model in Dairy: The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (7): 2498.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feng L., Friis A., Nilsson J. Social Capital among Members in Grain Marketing Cooperatives of Different Sizes. Agribusiness. 2016; 32 (1): 113-126.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feng L., Friis A., Nilsson J. Social Capital among Members in Grain Marketing Cooperatives of Different Sizes. Agribusiness. 2016; 32 (1): 113-126.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Головина С.Г., Смирнова Л.Н. Использование традиционной модели сельскохозяйственного кооператива в российской хозяйственной практике. Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. 2020; 6: 32-37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golovina S.G., Smirnova L.N. The use of the traditional model of an agricultural cooperative in Russian economic practice. Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises. 2020; 6: 32-37 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shantz A.S., Kistruck G.M., Pacheco D., Webb J.W. How Formal and Informal Hierarchies Shape Conflict within Cooperatives: A Field Experiment in Ghana. Academy of Management Journal. 2020; 63: 503-529.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shantz A.S., Kistruck G.M., Pacheco D., Webb J.W. How Formal and Informal Hierarchies Shape Conflict within Cooperatives: A Field Experiment in Ghana. Academy of Management Journal. 2020; 63: 503-529.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Snyder H. Literature Review as A Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 104: 333-339.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Snyder H. Literature Review as A Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 104: 333-339.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Torgerson R.E., Reynolds B.J., Gray T.W. Evolution of Cooperative Thought, Theory, and Purpose. Journal of Cooperatives. 1998; 13: 1-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Torgerson R.E., Reynolds B.J., Gray T.W. Evolution of Cooperative Thought, Theory, and Purpose. Journal of Cooperatives. 1998; 13: 1-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cook M.L., Chaddad F.R., Iliopoulos C. Advances in Cooperative Theory since 1990: A Review of Agricultural Economics Literature. In: Hendrikse G. (ed.). Restructuring Agricultural Cooperatives. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 2004: 65-90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cook M.L., Chaddad F.R., Iliopoulos C. Advances in Cooperative Theory since 1990: A Review of Agricultural Economics Literature. In: Hendrikse G. (ed.). Restructuring Agricultural Cooperatives. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 2004: 65-90.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cook M.L., Grashuis J. Theory of Cooperatives: Recent Developments. In: Routledge Handbook of Agricultural Economics. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018: 372-392.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cook M.L., Grashuis J. Theory of Cooperatives: Recent Developments. In: Routledge Handbook of Agricultural Economics. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018: 372-392.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grashuis J., Su Y. A Review of the Empirical Literature on Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership and Governance, Finance, and Member Attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 90 (1): 77-102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grashuis J., Su Y. A Review of the Empirical Literature on Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership and Governance, Finance, and Member Attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 90 (1): 77-102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Su Y., Cook M.L. Advances in Agricultural Cooperative Research Since 2007: A Review of Chinese Agricultural Economics Literature. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (4): 519-543.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Su Y., Cook M.L. Advances in Agricultural Cooperative Research Since 2007: A Review of Chinese Agricultural Economics Literature. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (4): 519-543.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Головина С.Г., Смирнова Л.Н. Сельскохозяйственная кооперация в условиях новых вызовов и угроз: от теоретических дискуссий к хозяйственной практике. Аграрный вестник Урала. 2021; 05 (208): 71-88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golovina S.G., Smirnova L.N. Agricultural cooperation in the face of new challenges and threats: from theoretical discussions to economic practice. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2021; 05 (208): 71-88 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сарайкин В.А., Янбых Р.Г. Направления совершенствования организации и эффективного развития кооперации. АПК: Экономика, Управление. 2017; 6: 40-47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saraikin V.A., Yanbykh R.G. Directions for improving the organization and effective development of cooperation. APK: Economics, Management. 2017; 6: 40-47 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wolz A. Golovina S., Nilsson J., Hess S. Reviewing Changing Institutional Conditions for Private Farming in Russia. Outlook on Agriculture. 2016; 45 (2):111-116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wolz A. Golovina S., Nilsson J., Hess S. Reviewing Changing Institutional Conditions for Private Farming in Russia. Outlook on Agriculture. 2016; 45 (2):111-116.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сарайкин В.А., Янбых Р.Г. Анализ устойчивости кооперативной формы хозяйствования аграрного сектора России в контексте институциональной теории фирмы. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика. 2019; 35 (2): 251-268.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saraykin V.A., Yanbykh R.G. Analysis of the sustainability of the cooperative form of managing the agrarian sector of Russia in the context of the institutional theory of the firm. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy. 2019; 35 (2): 251-268 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Янбых Р.Г. Тенденции развития сельскохозяйственных потребительских кооперативов в России. Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2017; 11: 77-83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanbykh R.G. Trends in the development of agricultural consumer cooperatives in Russia. Economics of agriculture in Russia. 2017; 11: 77-83 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurakin A., Visser O. Post-Socialist Agricultural Cooperatives in Russia: A Case Study of Top-Down Cooperatives in the Belgorod Region. Post-Communist Economies. 2017; 29 (2): 158-181.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurakin A., Visser O. Post-Socialist Agricultural Cooperatives in Russia: A Case Study of Top-Down Cooperatives in the Belgorod Region. Post-Communist Economies. 2017; 29 (2): 158-181.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hakelius K., Hansson H. Members’ Attitudes towards Cooperatives and Their Perception of Agency Problems. International Food and Agribusiness Management Association. 2016; 19 (4): 1-14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hakelius K., Hansson H. Members’ Attitudes towards Cooperatives and Their Perception of Agency Problems. International Food and Agribusiness Management Association. 2016; 19 (4): 1-14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sokoli O., Doluschitz R. Cooperative Evolvement through Political Era/ Epoch: Albanian’s Case and Comparisons. Economics of Agriculture. 2019; 66 (1): 189-204.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokoli O., Doluschitz R. Cooperative Evolvement through Political Era/ Epoch: Albanian’s Case and Comparisons. Economics of Agriculture. 2019; 66 (1): 189-204.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu L., Nilsson J. Social Capital and Financial Capital in Chinese Cooperatives. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (8): 2415.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu L., Nilsson J. Social Capital and Financial Capital in Chinese Cooperatives. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (8): 2415.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golovina S., Hess S., Nilsson J., Wolz A. Networking among Russian Farmers and Their Prospects for Success. Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (4): 484-499.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golovina S., Hess S., Nilsson J., Wolz A. Networking among Russian Farmers and Their Prospects for Success. Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (4): 484-499.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mwambi M., Bijman J., Mshenga P. Which Type of Producer Organization is (More) Inclusive? Dynamics of Farmers’ Membership and Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (2): 213-236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mwambi M., Bijman J., Mshenga P. Which Type of Producer Organization is (More) Inclusive? Dynamics of Farmers’ Membership and Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2020; 91 (2): 213-236.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kontogeorgos A., Sergaki P., Chatzitheodoridis F. An Assessment of New Farmers’ Perceptions about Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2017; 22 (1): 1750003 (1) — 1750003 (13).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kontogeorgos A., Sergaki P., Chatzitheodoridis F. An Assessment of New Farmers’ Perceptions about Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2017; 22 (1): 1750003 (1) — 1750003 (13).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iliopoulos C., Valentinov V. Member Preference Heterogeneity and Systemlifeworld Dichotomy in Cooperatives: An Exploratory Case Study. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2017; 30 (7):1063-1080.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iliopoulos C., Valentinov V. Member Preference Heterogeneity and Systemlifeworld Dichotomy in Cooperatives: An Exploratory Case Study. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2017; 30 (7):1063-1080.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golovina S., Antonova M., Abilova E. Assessment of Agricultural Cooperatives’ Performance in Russia: The Case of the Kurgan Region. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020; 392: 370-376.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golovina S., Antonova M., Abilova E. Assessment of Agricultural Cooperatives’ Performance in Russia: The Case of the Kurgan Region. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020; 392: 370-376.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yanbykh R., Saraikin V., Lerman Z. Cooperative Tradition in Russia: A Revival of Agricultural Service Cooperatives? Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (6): 751-771.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanbykh R., Saraikin V., Lerman Z. Cooperative Tradition in Russia: A Revival of Agricultural Service Cooperatives? Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (6): 751-771.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Höhler, J. and R. Kühl. Dimensions of Member Heterogeneity in Cooperatives and their Impact on Organization — A Literature Review. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 89 (4): 697-712.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Höhler, J. and R. Kühl. Dimensions of Member Heterogeneity in Cooperatives and their Impact on Organization — A Literature Review. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 89 (4): 697-712.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liang Q., Lu H., Deng W. Between Social Capital and Formal Governance in Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China. Outlook on Agriculture. 2018; 47 (1): 196-203.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liang Q., Lu H., Deng W. Between Social Capital and Formal Governance in Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China. Outlook on Agriculture. 2018; 47 (1): 196-203.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morfi C., Nilsson J., Österberg H. Why Farmers Involve Themselves in Co-Operative District Councils. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 89 (4): 581-598.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morfi C., Nilsson J., Österberg H. Why Farmers Involve Themselves in Co-Operative District Councils. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 89 (4): 581-598.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu L., Nilsson J. Farmers’ Assessments of Their Cooperatives in Economic, Social, and Environmental Terms: An Investigation in Fujian, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2021. №9: 1-11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu L., Nilsson J. Farmers’ Assessments of Their Cooperatives in Economic, Social, and Environmental Terms: An Investigation in Fujian, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2021. №9: 1-11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петриков А.В. Адаптация агропродовольственного сектора к постпандемической реальности. Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020; 223 (3): 99-105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrikov A.V. Adaptation of the agro-food sector to the post-pandemic reality. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2020; 223 (3): 99-105 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Узун В.Я. Продовольственная безопасность в условиях пандемии: риски и меры по их снижению. Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020. 223 (3):502-514.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uzun V.Ya. Food security in a pandemic: risks and measures to reduce them. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2020. 223 (3):502-514 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Billiet A., Dufays F., Friedel S, Staessens M. The Resilience of the Cooperative Model: How Do Cooperatives Deal with the COVID‐19 Crisis? Strategic Change. 2021; 30: 99-108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Billiet A., Dufays F., Friedel S, Staessens M. The Resilience of the Cooperative Model: How Do Cooperatives Deal with the COVID‐19 Crisis? Strategic Change. 2021; 30: 99-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">EURICSE, ICA The World Cooperative Monitor: Exploring the Cooperative Economy. 2021. Available from: https://www.monitor.coop/[Accessed 27 August 2022].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">EURICSE, ICA The World Cooperative Monitor: Exploring the Cooperative Economy. 2021. Available from: https://www.monitor.coop/[Accessed 27 August 2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bijman J. Exploring the Sustainability of the Cooperative Model in Dairy: The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (7): 2498.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bijman J. Exploring the Sustainability of the Cooperative Model in Dairy: The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (7): 2498.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li L., Guo H., Bijman J., Heerink N. The Influence of Uncertainty on the Choice of Business Relationships: The Case of Vegetable Farmers in China. Agribusiness. 2018; 34: 597-615.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li L., Guo H., Bijman J., Heerink N. The Influence of Uncertainty on the Choice of Business Relationships: The Case of Vegetable Farmers in China. Agribusiness. 2018; 34: 597-615.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skevas T., Grashuis J. Technical Efficiency and Spatial Spillovers: Evidence from Grain Marketing Cooperatives in the Us Midwest. Agribusiness. 2020; 36: 111-126.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skevas T., Grashuis J. Technical Efficiency and Spatial Spillovers: Evidence from Grain Marketing Cooperatives in the Us Midwest. Agribusiness. 2020; 36: 111-126.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hooks T., McCarthy O., Power C. Macken-Walsh A. A Co-operative Business Approach in a Values-based Supply Chain: A Case Study of a Beef Co-operative. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2017; 5 (2): 65-72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hooks T., McCarthy O., Power C. Macken-Walsh A. A Co-operative Business Approach in a Values-based Supply Chain: A Case Study of a Beef Co-operative. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2017; 5 (2): 65-72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antonova M., Nilsson J., Potapova A. Obstacles for Agricultural Cooperatives in Russia: The Competencies of Experts. International Journal on Food System Dynamics. 2022; 13 (3): 247-261.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antonova M., Nilsson J., Potapova A. Obstacles for Agricultural Cooperatives in Russia: The Competencies of Experts. International Journal on Food System Dynamics. 2022; 13 (3): 247-261.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
