Тhe effect of the feed additive Butitan (Farmatan BCO) on the histophysiological state of the intestinal tube and the productive qualities of broiler chickens
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-347-4-60-65
Abstract
The effect of the feed additive Butitan (Farmatan BCO) on the productive qualities and structure of the intestinal wall of broilers was studied. Daily broilers are divided into groups of 60 heads. The control group received the main diet. The experimental groups received Butitan supplements with the main diet: 1st experimental group — 250 g/t, 2nd experimental — 500 g/t and the third — 750 g/t. The duration of the experiment was 42 days. The live weight and feed 3rd were taken into account. Upon reaching 42 days poultry was slaughtered, anatomical cutting and samples were taken for histological studies. A chemical analysis of the pectoral and leg muscles was performed. In terms of live weight, the poultry of the experimental groups exceeded the control groups by 7,9% (P ≤ 0.05), 8,2 (P ≤ 0.01) and 8,1% (P ≤ 0.01). At the same time, feed costs per 1 kg of growth are lower by 2,4%; 3,8% and 1,4% respectively in the first, second and third experimental groups. In the experimental groups the weight of the gutted carcass increases by 6,7–15,0%. There is a tendency to increase the fat content in the pectoral muscles of birds of the experimental groups. Histological methods revealed that in the duodenum of broilers, the height of the villi layer and the thickness of the intestinal wall decreased with better preservation of the epithelium and greater severity of the lymphoid tissue. In the jejunum and proximal part of the caecum, the height of the villi layer is higher on average by 11,1 and 19,3%. However, better preservation of the epithelial lining was observed in the jejunum. The villi are involved in the absorption of nutrients and contribute to the effective use of the diet. Therefore, all the experimental groups had a large live weight with lower feed costs compared to the control.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. SeryakovaRussian Federation
Postgraduate at the department of morphology and veterinary and sanitary expertise
127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 44
V. P. Panov
Russian Federation
Doc. Sci. (Biological), Professor at the department of morphology and veterinary and sanitary expertise
127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 44
E. A. Prosekova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Biological), Docent, Associate Professor
127550, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 44
A. S. Komarchev
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Senior research
141311, Moscow Region, Sergiev Posad, Ptitsegradskaya str., 10
K. O. Voronin
Russian Federation
poultry specialist
125424, Moscow, Volokolamsk highway, 73
V. A. Tsvetkova
Russian Federation
Deputy general director
125424, Moscow, Volokolamsk highway, 73
References
1. Yunaeva N. V., Salandiev K. V., Slyusar A.V. Oregano Oil: An alternative to antibiotics for poultry. Pticevodstvo. 2016;8:43-47. (In Russ.).
2. Bagno O. A., Prokhorov O. N., Shevchenko S. A., 2, A. I. Shevchenko A. I., Dyadichkina T. V. Use of phytobioticts in farm animal feeding. Selskohozyajstvennaya biologiya. 2018;53(4):687-697. (In Russ.).
3. Fedotov V. A., Nikitchenko V. E., Nikitchenko D. V., Egorov I. A., Egorova T. V. Probiotics in poultry feeding. Pticevodstvo. 2018;8:33-37. (In Russ.).
4. Bagirov V. A., Duskaev G. K., Kazachkova N. M., Rakhmatullin Sh. G., Yausheva E. V., Kosyan D. B., Makaev Sh. A., Dusaeva Kh. B. Addition of Quercus cortex extract to broiler diet changes slaughter indicators and biochemical composition of muscletissue. Selskohozyajstvennaya biologiya. 2018;53(4):799-810. (In Russ.).
5. Ignatovich L.S. Influence of use of component feed additives, manufactured with the use of grass meal of yarrow, on laying hens productivity, quality of the products (eggs) and feed conversion. Dalnevostochnyj agrarnyj vestnik. 2017;2:75-81. (In Russ.).
6. Bushov A.V., Kurmanaeva V. V. Bio-preparations in diets for Smena-7 broilers. Pticevodstvo. 2012;1:31-33. (In Russ.).
7. Duskaev GK, Kazachkova NM, Ushakov AS, Nurzhanov BS, Rysaev AF. The effect of purified Quercus cortex extract on biochemical parameters of organism and productivity of healthy broiler chickens. Veterinary World. 2018;11:235-239.
8. Longstaf M, McNab JM. The inhibitory effects of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acids, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition. 1991;65:199-216.
9. Juliano C, Mattana A, Usai M. Composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Thymus herba- barona Loisel growing wild in Sardinia. Essent. Oil Res. 2000;12:516-522.
10. Marino M, Bersani C, Comi G. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Thymus vulgaris L. measured using a bioimpedometric method. Food Protect. 1999; 62:1017-1023.
11. Si W, Gong J, Tsao R, Zhou T, Yu H, Poppe C, Johnson R, Du Z. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and structurally related synthetic food additives towards selected pathogenic and beneficial gut bacteria. Applied Microbiology. 2006;100:296-305.
12. Dorman HJ, Deans SG. Antimicrobial agents from plants: antimicrobial activity of plant volatile oils. Applied Microbiology. 2000;88:308–316.
13. Baratta MT, Dorman HJ, Deans SG, Biondi DM, Ruberto G. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidative activity of laurel, sage, rosemary, oregano and coriander essentials oils. Essen. Oil Res. 1998;10:618–627.
14. Hagerman АЕ, Butler LG. Determination of protein in tannin-protein precipitate. Agric Food Chem. 1980;28(5):944-94.
15. Makaeva A.M., Atlanderova K.N. Digestibility of feed nutrients after using bio-stimulant extract of oak cortex (Quercus cortex) in vitro. Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo. 2018;101(1):147-153. (In Russ.).
16. Griffiths DW, Moseley G. Effect of diet containing field beans of high and low polyphenolic content on the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestine of rats. Sci. Food Agric. 1980;31:255-259.
17. Horigome T, Kumar R, Okamoto K. Effect of condensed tannins prepared from leaves of fodder plants on digestive enzymes in vitro and in the intestine of rats. British Journal of Nutrition. 1988;60:275-285.
18. Ahmed AE, Smtthard R, Ellis M. Activities of enzymes of the pancreas, and the lumen and mucosa of the small intestine in growing broiler cockerels fed on tannin-containing diets. British Journal of Nutrition. 1991;65:189-197.
19. Mangan JL. Nutritional effects of tannins in animal feeds. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1981;1:209-231.
20. Ortiz LT, Alzueta C, Trevino J, Castano M. Effects of faba bean tannins on the growth and histological structure of the intestinal tract and liver of chicks and rats. Brit. Poult. Sci. 1994;35:743-754.
21. Oso AO, Suganthi RU, Manjunatha Reddy GB, Malik PK, Thirumalaisamy G, Awachat VB, Selvaraju S, Arangasamy A, Bhatta R. Effect of dietary supplementation with phytogenic blend on growth performance, apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, intestinal morphology, and cecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2019;98:4755–4766.
22. Jamroz D, Wertelecki T, Houszka M, Kamel C. Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2006;90: P.255–268.
23. Dibner JJ, Kitchell ML, Atwell CA, Ivey FJ. The effects of dietary ingredients and age on the microscopic structure of the gastrointestinal tract in poultry. Appl. Poult. Res. 1996;5:70–77.
24. Buyarov V.S., Chervonova I.V., Mednova V.V, Il’icheva I.N. Efficiency of application of phytobiotics in poultry farming (review). Vestnik agrarnoj nauki. 2020;3(84):44-59. (In Russ.).
25. Prosekova EA. Growth and morphofunctional state of organs and tissues of broilers grown with probiotics. М. : RGAU-MSHA. 2011. 200 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Seryakova A.A., Panov V.P., Prosekova E.A., Komarchev A.S., Voronin K.O., Tsvetkova V.A. Тhe effect of the feed additive Butitan (Farmatan BCO) on the histophysiological state of the intestinal tube and the productive qualities of broiler chickens. Agrarian science. 2021;(4S):60-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-347-4-60-65