Polyenzyme preparations in feeding of monogastric animals
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-348-4-35-43
Abstract
In animal feeding enzyme preparations are mainly used, which are not produced in the body of animals, although in chickens in the first weeks of life and piglets after weaning an insufficient amount of their own proteases and amylases is formed, so their inclusion in feed is also useful. By now highly active enzyme preparations with various specific activities have been created and are being produced. In feeds prepared using traditional raw materials up to 30% of nutrients are not available for digestion by enzymes secreted in the gastrointestinal tract. The inclusion of exogenous enzymes in the feed provides additional use of the indigestible fraction. It is impossible to achieve complete digestibility of feed, although in vitro exogenous enzymes digest almost 100% of the target substrates. The problem is due to the fact that natural feed does not contain pure substrates — they are associated with other substances that limit the availability of enzymes to them. The properties of natural substrates, their concentration and availability even in the same raw material are variable, which excludes reliable prediction of the effectiveness of the action of feed enzymes. Partially these difficulties are overcomed by the use of polyenzyme drugs. It is necessary to further study the specificity of native substrates and factors that increase their availability for the action of enzymes.
About the Authors
V. S. Kryukov
Kormogran LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. V. Zinoviev
VNIIPP — branch of the VNITIP Federal Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rzhavki village, Moscow region
R. V. Nekrasov
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Podolsk, Dubrovitsy, Moscow Region
I. V. Glebova
Kursk State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kursk
V. B. Galetsky
Gatchina KKZ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leningrad region. Gatchinsky district, Malye Kolpany village
References
1. Kryukov, V. S, Glebova, I. V., and Antipov, A. A., Evaluation of the phytase activity in the gastrointestinal tract and the use of phytase preparations in the animal diet (review), Problemy Biol. Produkt. Zhivotnykh, 2019; 2: 19–43. (in Russ.).
2. Cowieson A. J. Strategic Selection of Exogenous Enzymes for Corn/soy-based Poultry Diets. Poultry Science. 2010, 47: 1–7.
3. Vieira S.L., Stefanello C., Sorbara J.O.B. Formulating poultry diets based on their indigestible components. Poultry Science. 2014, 93: 2411–2416
4. Raza A., Bashir S., Tabassum R. An update on carbohydrases: growth performance and intestinal health of poultry. Heliyon, 2019 5e 01437. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019. e0143
5. Choct M. Enzmes for the feed industry: past, present and future. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2006, 62: 5–16.
6. Cowieson A.J., Ravindran V. Effect of exogenous enzymes in maize-based diets varying in nutrient density for young broilers: growth performance and digestibility of energy, minerals and aminoacids. British Poultry Science. 2008, 49: 37–44.
7. Lee K. W., Choi Y. I., Moon E. J., Oh S. T., Lee H. H., Kang C. W., An B. K. Evaluation of Dietary Multiple Enzyme Preparation (Natuzyme) in Laying Hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014. 27(12): 1749–1754.
8. Cowieson A.J., Bedford M.R. The effect of phytase and carbohydrase on ileal amino acid digestibility in monogastric diets: complimentary mode of action? World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2009, 65: 609–624.
9. Gao F., JiangY., Zhou G.H., Han Z.K. The effects of xylanase supplementation on performance, characteristics of the gastrointestinal tract, blood parameters and gut microflora in broilers fed on wheat-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008, 142: 173–184.
10. Yuan J, Wang X, Yin D, Wang M, Yin X, Lei Z, Guo Y. Effect of different amylases on the utilization of corn starch in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2017, 96:1139–1148.
11. Bedford MR. Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition — their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2000, 86: 1–13.
12. Tejedor A.A., Albino L.F.T., Rostagno H.S., Lima C.A.R., Vieites F.M. Effect of Enzymes Supplementation in Corn Soybean Meal Broiler Diets on Ileal Digestibility of Nutrients. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2001, 30:809–816.
13. Gomes J. E. G., da Silva Nascimento T. C. E., de França Queiroz A. E. S., de Siqueira Silva J. I. júnior, de Souza Motta C. M., de Medeiros E. V. and Moreira K. A. Production, characterization and evaluation of in vitro digestion of phytases, xylanases and cellulases for feed industry. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014, 8: 551–558.
14. Cowieson A. J., Adeola O. Carbohydrases, Protease, and Phytase Have an Additive Beneficial Effect in Nutritionally Marginal Diets for Broiler Chicks. Poultry Science. 2005, 84:1860–1867.
15. Meng X., Slominski B., Nyachoti A., Campbell C.M., Guenter L.D. Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides by combinations of carbohydrase enzymes and their effect on nutrient utilization and broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science. 2005, 84:37–47.
16. De La Mare, M., Guais, O., Bonnin, E., Weber, J., Francois, J.M., Molecular and biochemical characterization of three GH62 a-l-arabinofuranosidases from the soil deuteromycete Penicillium funiculosum. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2013, 53 (5): 351–358.
17. Cozannet, P., Neto, R.M., Geraert, P.-A., Kidd M. Feedase: the new generation of feed enzymes to optimise complete nutrient availability in diets: feed science. AFMA Matrix. 2017, 26: 24–25.
18. Masey O’Neill H. V., Smith J. A. and Bedford M. R. Multicarbohydrase Enzymes for Non-ruminants. AsianAustralasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014, 27: 290–301.
19. Theander, O., Westerlund E., Aman P., Graham H. Plant cell walls and monogastric diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 1989, 23: 205–225.
20. Slominski B. A. Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets Poultry Science. 2011, 90: 2013–2023.
21. Willamil J., Badiola I., Devillard E., Geraert P. A., Torrallardona D. Wheat-barley-rye- or corn-fed growing pigs respond differently to dietary supplementation with a carbohydrase complex. Journal of Animal Science. 2012, 90: 824–832.
22. Mathlouthi N., Juin H., Larbier M. Effect of xylanase and β-glucanase supplementation of wheat- or wheat- and barleybased diets on the performance of male turkeys. British Poultry Science. 2003, 44: 291–298.
23. Aman P, Graham H. Chemical Evaluation of Polysaccharides in Animal Feeds. In: Feedstuff Evaluation, Eds: Wiseman, J. and Cole D.J.A. Chapter 9, London, UK; 1990. p.161–177.
24. Parker K. N., Chhabra S. R., Lam D. Galactomannanases Man2 and Man5 from Thermotoga species: growth physiology on galactomannans, gene sequence analysis, and biochemical properties of recombinant enzymes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2001, 75: 322–333.
25. Rehman Z. U., Aziz T., Bhatti S. A., Ahmad G., Kamran J., Umar S., Meng and Ding C. Effect of β-mannanase on the Performance and Digestibility of Broilers. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2016, 11: 393–398.
26. Jang J.-C., Kim K. H., Jang Y. D., Kim Y. Y. Effects of dietaryβ-mannanase supplementation on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, intestinal integrity, and immune responses in weaning pigs. Animals. 2020, 10: 703–709.
27. Pettey L.A., Carter S.D., Senne, B.W., Shriver, J.A. Effects of β-mannanase addition to corn-soybean meal diets on growth performance, carcass traits, and nutrient digestibility of weanling and growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2002, 80: 1012–1019.
28. Carr S.N., Alee G.L., Rincker P.J., Fry R.S., Boler D.D. Effects of endo-1,4-β-d-mannanase enzyme (Hemicell HT 1.5ç) on the growth performance of nursery pigs. The Professional Animal Scientis. 2014, 30: 393–399.
29. Latham R., Williams M, Smit K, Stringfellow K., Brister R., Clemente S., Lee J. Effect of β-mannanase on growth performance, ileal digestible energy, and intestinal viscosity of male broilers fed a reduced energy diet. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2016, 25: 40–47.
30. Huntley N.F., Nyachoti C.M., Patience J.F. Lipopolysaccharide immune stimulation but not β-mannanase supplementation affects maintenance energy requirements in young weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2018, 9: 47–63.
31. Torres-Pitarch A., Manzanilla E.G., Gardiner G.E., O’Doherty J.V., Lawlor P.G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of feed enzymes on growth and nutrient digestibility in grow-finisher pigs: Effect of enzyme type and cereal source. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2019, 251: 153–165.
32. Noy Y., Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poultry Science. 1995, 74:366–373.
33. Ma J, Yang T, Yang M, Yan Z, Zhao L, Yao L, Chen J, Chen Q, Tan B, Li T, Yin J, Yin Y. Effects of dietary amylose/amylopectin ratio and amylase on growth performance, energy and starch digestibility, and digestive enzymes in broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berl). 2020, 104: 928–935.
34. Gao X., Yu B., Yu J., Mao X., Huang Z., Luo Y., Luo J., Zheng P., He J., Chen D. Effects of Dietary Starch Structure on Growth Performance, Serum Glucose–Insulin Response, and Intestinal Health in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2020, 10 (3): 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani1003054.
35. Stefanello C., Vieira S. L., Santiago G. O., Kindlein L., Sorbara J. O. B., Cowieson A. J. Starch digestibility, energy utilization, and growth performance of broilers fed corn-soybean basal diets supplemented with enzymes. Poultry Science. 2015, 94:2472–2479.
36. Shimada M., Mochizuki K., Goda T. Feeding rats dietary resistant starch shifts the peak of SGLT1 gene expression and histone H3 acetylation on the gene from the upper jejunum toward the ileum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009, 57: 8049–8055.
37. Gracia M.I., Aranibar M.J., Lázaro R., Medel P., Mateos G.G. Alfa-amylase Supplementation of Broiler Diets Based on Corn. Poultry Science. 2003, 82: 436–442.
38. Jiang Z., Zhou Y., Lu F., Han Z, Wang T. Effects of different levels of supplementary alpha-amylase on digestive enzyme activities and pancreatic amylase mRNA expression of young broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2008, 21: 97–102.
39. Kaczmarek S.A., Rogiewicz A., Mogielnicka M., Rutkowski A., Jones R.O., Slominski B.A. The effect of protease, amylase, and nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzyme supplementation on nutrient utilization and growth performance of broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal-based diets. Poultry Science. 2014, 93: 1745–1753.
40. Mahagna M., Nir I., Larbier M., Nitsan Z. Effect of age and exogenous amylase and protease on development of the digestive tract, pancreatic enzyme activities and digestibility of nutrients in young meat-type chicks. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 1995. 35: 201-212.
41. Yegani M., Korver D.R. Effects of corn source and exogenous enzymes on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2013, 92:1208–1220.
42. Yi J. Q., Piao X. S., Li Z. C., Zhang H. Y., Chen Y., Li Q. Y., Liu J. D., Zhang Q., Ru Y. J., and Dong B. Тhe Effects of Enzyme Complex on Performance, Intestinal Health and Nutrient Digestibility of Weaned Pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2013, 26:1181–1188.
43. Wealleans A. L., Walsh M. C., Romero L. F., V. Ravindran. Comparative effects of two multi-enzyme combinations and a Bacillus probiotic on growth performance, digestibility of energy and nutrients, disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides, and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2017, 96:4287–4297.
44. Mohiti-Asli M., Ghanaatparast-Rashti M., Akbarian P. and Mousavi S. N. Effects of a combination of phytase and multicarbohydrase enzymes in low-density corn–soybean meal based diets on growth performance and ileal nutrients digestibility of male broilers. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2020, 19: 1533–1541.
45. Goli S., Shahryar H. A. Effect of Enzymes Supplementation (Rovabio and Kemin) on some Blood Biochemical Parameters, Performance and Carcass Characterizes in Broiler Chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 2015, 5 (issue 1, №;1): 127–131.
46. Cowieson A.J., Acamovic T., Bedford M.R. Using the precision-feeding bioassay to determine the efficacy of exogenous enzymes - A new perspective. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2006, 129(1- 2):149–158.
Review
For citations:
Kryukov V.S., Zinoviev S.V., Nekrasov R.V., Glebova I.V., Galetsky V.B. Polyenzyme preparations in feeding of monogastric animals. Agrarian science. 2021;(4):35-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-348-4-35-43
Views:
459
Email this article 