Influence of sow resistance indices on the growth of their offspring
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-351-7-8-19-23
Abstract
Relevance. Pig breeding is primarily aimed at improving their reproductive and fattening qualities. To a lesser extent, the selection takes into account the indicators of the immune status of animals and their resistance to conditionally pathogenic microflora, apparently because due to the significant variability of individual blood parameters in ontogenesis, work with animals of many generations is required to improve these signs by breeding. The urgent task is to accelerate this process.
Methods. 6 groups of animals were formed, including: 2 groups of 20 young sows of the Durock breed and large white breed and 2 groups of piglets, their offspring; 10 piglets from each group were weighed monthly, their linear measurements were determined. The study of natural resistance was carried out according to the following indicators: lysozyme, bactericidal and complementary activity of blood serum were measuredby conventional methods and in the author’s modification, hemagglutination reactionand bacterial agglutination — by conventional methods, indicators of phagocytosis were determined by conventional methods and in the author's modification.
Results. A new method of comprehensive assessment of the level of natural resistance of pigs based on eight blood parameters — the resistance index (IR) — has been developed. For the first time, two coefficients — repeatability (rw) and persistence (h2) — were used as the statistical weight of traits. It was found that the live weight gain was higher in the offspring obtained from sows with an IR > 60 points. The offspring of highly resistant sows also had an advantage in linear torso measurements.
About the Authors
V. V. FedyukRussian Federation
the Head of the Department of Farm Animal Breeding, Private Zootechnics and Zoo Hygiene named after academician P.E. Ladan, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor,
346493, Rostov region, Oktyabrsky district, s. Persianovsky, Krivoshlykov str., 24
A. A. Chertov
Russian Federation
Post-graduate Student of the Department of Farm Animal Breeding, Private Zootechnics and Zoo Hygiene named after academician P.E. Ladan,
346493, Rostov region, Oktyabrsky district, s. Persianovsky, Krivoshlykov str., 24
References
1. Mikhailov N.V., Klimenko A.I., Tretyakova O.L., Yakovenko V.K. Reproduction of pigs (technology and selection). s. Persianovsky, 2000. 130 p. (InRuss.)
2. Maksimov G.V., Maksimov A.G. New in pig breeding. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. s. Persianovsky, 2005. p. 81- 83. (InRuss.)
3. Novikov V.V., Dmitrienko V.V. The main parameters of the immune status of clinically healthy pigs. Journal Veterinary Medicine. 1993;2: 22-25. (InRuss.)
4. Petrov, R.V. Khaitov R.M., Pinegin B.V., Oradovskaya I.V., Eremina O.F., Saidov M.Z. Assessment of human immune status in mass examinations. Methodical recommendations for scientists and doctors of practical health care (developed by the staff of the Institute of immunology of the Ministry of health of Russia). Journal Immunology. 1992;6: 51-62 (InRuss.)
5. Bazhov, G.M., Pogodaev V.A. Pig farming: Textbook / G.M. Bazhov, V.A. Pogodaev. Stavropol: Servisshkola. 2009. 528 p. (InRuss.)
6. Bazhov G.M. Intensive pig farming: Textbook. St-Petersburg: Lan. 2021. 416 p. (InRuss.)
7. Fedyuk V.V. Breeding techniques for increasing the resistance of pigs. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Actual problems of pork production in the Russian Federation. s. Persianovsky. 2009. p. 50-52. (InRuss.)
8. Fedyuk, V.V. Natural resistance of pigs: monography. s. Kamenolomni. 2000. 100 p. (InRuss.)
9. Fedyuk, V.V., Kryshtop E.A. Methods of studying the natural resistance of farm animals, scientific and practical recommendations. s. Persianovsky. 2000. 18 p. (InRuss.)
10. Fedyuk V.V., Chertov A.A. / Journal Agrarian Seines. 2020; 11-12: 41-44. (InRuss.)
Review
For citations:
Fedyuk V.V., Chertov A.A. Influence of sow resistance indices on the growth of their offspring. Agrarian science. 2021;(7-8):19-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-351-7-8-19-23