The nutritional regime of the soil and the nitrogen status of plants in the grain-fallow and fruitshifting crop rotations
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-357-3-51-56
Abstract
The main agrotechnical significance of crop rotation is that each crop is placed in the best conditions for its growth and development and at the same time prepares good conditions for the next crop in the crop rotation. Under optimal cultivation conditions and a high level of mineral nutrition, the grain yield of modern wheat varieties reaches 18.4 c/ha. In real economic conditions, when high prices for mineral fertilizers limit their use, the yield of spring wheat grain in the Kostanay region is 11.2 c/ha. In the experiment, 2 types of crop rotations were studied — 4-course grain-fallow (fallow— wheat — wheat — wheat) and 4-course fruit-shifting (peas — wheat — oilseed flax — wheat). On each crop rotation variants with different levels of mineral nutrition were laid — without fertilizers (control) and P15. Seeding rate of agricultural crops (million/ha of germinating seeds): spring wheat — 3.0; peas — 1.0; oilseed flax — 6.0. The experiment adopted the technology of tillage — No-till with elements of precision farming. All records and observations were carried out according to standard methods. The analysis of the dynamics of the food regime of the soil indicates that the best conditions for mineral nutrition of plants are created when placing crops in a grain-fallow crop rotation, which includes herbicidal steam with long-term annual application of mineral fertilizers. Thus, in the soil layer of 0–40 cm on the first wheat after fallow, the content of nitrate nitrogen was characterized as average and amounted to 11.9–12.8 mg/kg, the content of mobile phosphorus had increased and amounted to 121 mg/kg of soil. In terms of the effectiveness of the use of options for the purpose of regulating the food regime, it is necessary to distinguish all three wheat fields in the grain-fallow crop rotation. Here, the highest indicator in the earing phase — above the control by 6.1–14.7% — was in variants with the use of fertilizer in rows.
About the Authors
Yu. V. TulayevKazakhstan
Tulaev Yurij Valerevich, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Precision and Organic Agriculture
A. B. Abuova
Kazakhstan
Abuova Altynaj Burhatovna, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences
S. V. Somova
Kazakhstan
Somova Svetlana Vladimirovna, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Precision and Organic Agriculture
A. I. Sidorik
Kazakhstan
Sidorik Aleksandr Ivanovich, PhD-doctoral student
O. S. Safronova
Kazakhstan
Safronova Olga Stanislavovna, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Agrochemical and Genetic Research
References
1. Usenko S.V., Usenko V.I., Garkusha A.A. The effectiveness of tillage techniques and means of intensification on spring wheat, depending on weather conditions and its predecessor in the foreststeppe of the Altai Ob region. Agriculture. 2019; (5): 16–21. (in Rus)].
2. Pashkova G.I. The influence of precursors on the productivity of spring wheat. Bulletin of the Mari State University. Series: Agricultural Sciences. Economic sciences. 2020; Vol. 6, 1. (21): 48–53. (in Rus).
3. Zhdanov V.M., Skorokhodov V.Yu., Kaftan Yu.V., Mitrofanov D.V., Zenkova N.A., Zhizhin V.N. Yield of spring soft wheat in the Orenburg Urals. Proceedings of the Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2015; 1. (51): 24–26. (in Rus).
4. Borisova E.E. The influence of precursors and green fertilizers on the food regime of the soil and the yield of spring wheat. Bulletin of the Michurinsky State Agrarian University. 2014; (3): 38–41. (in Rus).
5. Turusov V.I., Boghykh O.A., Dronova N.V., Balyunova E.A. The influence of precursors on the food regime of the soil, yield and quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the conditions of the south-east of the Central Asian Republic. Problems of agrochemistry and ecology. 2020; (2):11–15. (in Rus).
6. Kelehsashvili L.M. Features of the soil regime in dependence on mineral fertilizers. Scientific life. 2021; T. 16, 4 (116): 465–476. (in Rus).
7. Boldysheva E.P., Chudinov V.A., Popova V.I., Bekmagambetov A.I. Application of mineral fertilizers for spring wheat with resource-saving technology of cultivation on ordinary chernozem. Bulletin of the Omsk State Agrarian University. 2020; 2. (38): 41–51. (in Rus).
8. Bobrenko I.A., Shumakova O.V., Goman N.V., Novikov Y.I., Popova V.I., Blinov O.A. Improving Competitiveness of the Wheat Production within the Siberian Region (in Terms of the Omsk region). Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2017; Vol. 8, (2): 426–436. (in Eng)
9. Nardin D.S., Bobrenko I.A., Goman N.V., Vakalova E.A., Nardina S.A. Increasing Economic Efficiency of Producing Wheat in the West Siberia and South Ural as a Factor of Developing Import Substitution. International Review of Management and Marketing. 2016; Vol. 6, (4): 772–778. (in Eng)
10. Abuova A.B., Tulkubayeva S.A., Tulayev Yu.V., Tashmukhamedov M.B., Plotnikov V.G. Effect of soil fertility variability on the yield of grain crops in Northern. Annals of Agri-Bio Research. 2019; 24 (2): 183–190. (in Eng)
11. Kulikova A.H., Toygildin A.L., Tsapovskaya O.N. Nutritional regime and biological activity of soil in dependence on copper contamination and the role of diatomite as a detoxifier. Agrarian science. 2022; 355 (1): 72–77. (in Rus).
12. Kononchuk V.V., Goncharenko M.S., Borodulya M.V. Precursor and fertilization of grain crops in crop rotations of the Central Non-Chernozem region. Agrochemical Bulletin. 2013; (6): 8–13. (in Rus).
13. Gilevich S.I., Gossen E.F. Soil water regime in crop rotations. Bulletin of agricultural science of Kazakhstan. 1983; (11): 37–40. (in Rus).
14. Pryanishnikov D. N. General issues of agronomy and chemicalization of agriculture. Selected works. Publisher: Nauka (Moscow). 1976: 591 p. (in Rus).
Review
For citations:
Tulayev Yu.V., Abuova A.B., Somova S.V., Sidorik A.I., Safronova O.S. The nutritional regime of the soil and the nitrogen status of plants in the grain-fallow and fruitshifting crop rotations. Agrarian science. 2022;(3):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-357-3-51-56