Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

Microbial landscape in acute purulent-catarrhal postpartum endometritis in cows

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-66-71

Abstract

A special place among environmental factors affecting the body of animals is occupied by microorganisms— pathogens of infectious diseases. In this regard, the problem of circulation of associations of conditionally pathogenic microorganisms capable of causing a fairly wide range of pathologies in cattle in cattle is acute. The article provides a study of the microbial background of the vaginal-luminous contents selected in the acute purulent-catarrhal postpartum endomethry in cows. It was shown that 58 strains of opportunistic microorganisms of 13 species, classified into 6 genera, were isolated from 20 cows suffering from acute purulent catarrhal endometritis. The most frequently isolated cultures were St. aureus, E. coli (serotypes O4, O9 and O83), Str. pyogenes, Str. agalactiae, P. aeruginosa, Str. uberis and Str. faecalis. Moreover, the development of acute purulent-catarrhal endometritis in cows was more often caused by grampositive bacteria. Of the 58 isolated strains of microorganisms, 22 (37.9%) cultures caused the death of white mice when administered intraperitoneally. At the same time, gram-positive cocci were more likely to have pathogenic properties, namely representatives of the genera Streptococcus spp. (11 — 50.0%) and Staphylococcus spp. (6 — 27.3%) isolates, respectively. It was found that endometritis more often causes associations of opportunistic microorganisms, which included three joints in 14 (50.0%) cases, less often four joints in 7 (25.0%) cases. The isolated microorganisms were sensitive to only three antibacterial drugs: cefkin, cefepime and marbofloxacin.

About the Authors

V. I. Lutsay
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Vladimir Ivanovich Lutsaу, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Head of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080



N. Yu. Soloshenko
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Natalya Yurievna Soloshenko, Director of the laboratory “Vivarium” of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080



A. M. Nefedov
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Anton Maksimovich Nefedov, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080



V. D. Sibirtsev
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Vladimir Dmitrievich Sibirtsev, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080



A. A. Rudenko
Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Andrey Anatolievich Rudenko, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080



P. A. Rudenko
Russian Biotechnological University; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Pavel Anatolievich Rudenko, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor of the Department of Veterinary Medicine

11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080

6 Miklukho-Maclay Str., Moscow, 117198



References

1. Zhang H. et al. Mortality-Culling Rates of Dairy Calves and Replacement Heifers and Its Risk Factors in Holstein Cattle. Animals. 2019; 9(10): 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100730

2. Rudenko P.A., Vatnikov Yu.A., Rudenko A.A., Rudenko V.B. Epizootic analysis of factor-infected cattle farms. Scientific life. 2020; 15(4): 572‒585 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.35679/1991-9476-2020-15-4-572-585

3. Bercovich Z. Maintenance of Brucella Abortus‐free herds: A review with emphasis on the epidemiology and the problems in diagnosing brucellosis in areas of low prevalence. Veterinary Quarterly. 1998; 20(3): 81‒88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1998.9694845

4. Enríquez D., Hötzel M.J., Ungerfeld R. Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2011; 53: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-53-28

5. Gonzalez-Rivas P.A., Chauhan S.S., Ha M., Fegan N., Dunshea F.R., Warner R.D. Effects of heat stress on animal physiology, metabolism, and meat quality: A review. Meat Science. 2020; 162: 108025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108025

6. Yuldashbaev Yu.A., Vatnikov Yu.A., Rudenko P.A., Rudenko A.A. Features of the functional state of the organism of sheep under stress. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries. 2022; 17(2): 193‒202 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797x-2022-17-2-193-202

7. Ali M.Z., Carlile G., Giasuddin M. Impact of global climate change on livestock health: Bangladesh perspective. Open Veterinary Journal. 2020; 10(2): 178‒188. https://doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v10i2.7

8. Stafford K.J., Gregory N.G. Implications of intensification of pastoral animal production on animal welfare. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2008; 56(6): 274‒280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2008.36847

9. Scarsella E., Zecconi A., Cintio M., Stefanon B. Characterization of Microbiome on Feces, Blood and Milk in Dairy Cows with Different Milk Leucocyte Pattern. Animals. 2021; 11(5): 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051463

10. Rudenko A., Glamazdin I., Lutsay V., Sysoeva N., Tresnitskiy S., Rudenko P. Parasitocenoses in cattle and their circulation in small farms. E3S Web of Conferences. 2022; 363: 03029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303029

11. LeBlanc S.J. Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Animal. 2014; 8(S1): 54‒63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000524

12. Gazzonis A.L., Zanzani S.A., Aloisio G., Migliorati E., Villa L., Manfredi M.T. Gastrointestinal parasitic infections in intensive dairy cattle breeding: Update on the epidemiology and associated risk factors in northern Italy. Parasitology International. 2022; 91: 102641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2022.102641

13. Moret-Stalder S. et al. Prevalence study of Staphylococcus aureus in quarter milk samples of dairy cows in the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2009; 88(1): 72‒76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.06.020

14. Todhunter D.A., Smith K.L., Hogan J.S., Schoenberger P.S. Gram-negative bacterial infections of the mammary gland in cows. American journal of veterinary research. 1991; 52(2): 184‒188.

15. Barański W., Baryczka A., Zduńczyk S., Tobolski D., Janowski T. Prevalence of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows that recovered after treatment of clinical endometritis with cephapirin and PGF2α. Theriogenology. 2022; 192: 166‒171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.08.031

16. Nyabinwa P., Kashongwe O.B., Habimana J.P., d’Andre Hirwa C., Bebe B.O. Estimating prevalence of endometritis in smallholder zero-grazed dairy cows in Rwanda. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2020; 52(6): 3135‒3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02337-z

17. Ghallab R.S., El-Karim D.R.S.G., Fayed A.-H., Rashad A.M.A. Efficiency of conventional and nanoparticle oxytetracycline in treatment of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2023; 55(2): 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03536-0

18. Osawa T. Predisposing factors, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of persistent endometritis in postpartum cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2021; 67(5): 291‒299. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2021-052

19. Pascottini O.B., Aurich C., England G., Grahofer A. General and comparative aspects of endometritis in domestic species: A review. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2023; 58(S2): 49‒71. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14390

20. Kalashnikov V.A. Determination of sensitivity to antibiotics of microflora, isolated from the genital tract of patients with endometritis of cows. Veterinary medicine. Interdepartmental thematic scientific collection. Kharkiv. 2004; 83: 107‒110 (in Russian).

21.


Review

For citations:


Lutsay V.I., Soloshenko N.Yu., Nefedov A.M., Sibirtsev V.D., Rudenko A.A., Rudenko P.A. Microbial landscape in acute purulent-catarrhal postpartum endometritis in cows. Agrarian science. 2024;(3):66-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-66-71

Views: 262


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X