Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

Morphological changes in the liver of bulls after the use of adaptogens

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-72-79

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study of the influence of adaptogens of plant and animal nature on the productive qualities of Kazakh white-headed bulls and morphological changes in their liver. 40 6-month-old beef bulls were selected for the study, which were divided into 4 groups: I (control) group of bulls consumed only the basic diet, II — adaptogen leucea safflower, III — drone homogenate, IV — pantocrine at the rate of 0.01 ml per 1 kg of animal body weight. At 18 months, a control slaughter of 3 animals from each group was carried out. During the experiment, it was found that the mass of the paired carcass in the bulls of the experimental groups increased by 11.1–21.7 kg (4.25–8.31%, р ≤ 0.05), the slaughter weight by 11.7–23.0 kg (4.24–8.34%, р ≤ 0.05–0.01), the slaughter yield by 0.9–1.9%. The analysis of the morphological composition of the carcass indicates an increase in the specific weight of its edible part of the carcass: by weight of muscle tissue by 4.0–7.7 kg (4.66–8.97%, р ≤ 0.05–0.01), fat — by 0.7–1.4 kg (4.67–9.33%, р ≤ 0.05). There is a high degree of maturity and high nutritional value of the meat of bulls of the experimental groups. Histological studies of the liver of bull calves indicate that when using tincture from drones, the liver structure corresponds to the norm, while in the control group animals some signs of dystrophic changes without pronounced infiltrations and signs of stagnation were found.

About the Authors

I. V. Mironova
Bashkir State Agrarian University; Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
Russian Federation

Irina Valeryevna Mironova, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor

34 50 letiya Oktybrya, Ufa, 450001

1 Kosmonavtov Str., Ufa, 450064



R. M. Khabibullin
Bashkir State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Ruzel Mullahmetovich Khabibullin, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor

34 50 letiya Oktybrya, Ufa, 450001



I. M. Khabibullin
Bashkir State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Ilmir Mullahmetovich Khabibullin, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor 

34 50 letiya Oktybrya, Ufa, 450001



References

1. Chinarov A.V. Reserves of meat production: breed zoning of beef cattle breeding in Russia. Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises. 2020; (12): 23–26 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2020-0-12-23-26

2. Ilchenko I. Beef cattle breeding needs intensive development and healthy competition. Effektivnoye zhivotnovodstvo. 2021; (5): 91–99 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/dpugck

3. Osyanin D.N., Petrunina I.V. Current state and development trends of Russian beef cattle breeding. Meat industry journal. 2021; (4): 32–35 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37861/2618-8252-2021-04-32-35

4. Kosilov V.I., Rakhimzhanova I.A., Salihov A.A., Rebezov M.B., Mironova I.V., Perevoiko Zh.A. Influence of feeding level and genotype on age dynamics of live weight of purebred and crossbred heifers. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2022; (1): 208–212 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2022-93-1-208-212

5. Zhaimysheva S.S., Nurzhanov B.S., Tolochka V.V., Rebezov M.B., Salikhov A.A., Kubatbekov T.S. Influence of the genotype of bulls on the age dynamics of live weight and growth intensity. Michurinsk agronomy bulletin. 2020; (3): 20–26 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ejjafr

6. Nikonova E.A. et al. Efficiency of using crossbreeding in beef production. Michurinsk agronomy bulletin. 2021; (4): 44–58 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/jkqqmv

7. Kubatbekov T.S. et al. Influence of crossing Black-and-white cattle with Holstein on the slaughter qualities of crossbred young stock. Michurinsk agronomy bulletin. 2021; (1): 54–59 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ymcglj

8. Guber N.B., Rebezov M.B. Estimation of effect of biologically active substances on the quality of beef. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Stavropol′skogo nauchno-issledovatel′skogo instituta zhivotnovodstva i kormoproizvodstva. 2014; 2(7): 47–50 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tbirjf

9. Gorelik A.S., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B. Correlation of weight growth of repair heifers-daughters of Holstein bulls-producers by growth periods. Agricultural science and production: implementation of innovative technologies in the agro-industrial complex. Collection of articles prepared within the framework of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Agricultural University. 2022; 60–66 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/chjbtp

10. Tretyak L.N., Rebezov M.B., Yavkina D.I. Analysis of consumer preferences for organic meat products. Vsyo o myase. 2023; (1): 20–24 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2023-1-20-24

11. Tretyak L.N., Rebezov M.B., Gebel V.L., Miftakhutdinov A.V. Analysis of consumer preferences and evaluation of the properties of organic food products. Agro-industrial complex of Russia. 2022; 29(2): 262–270 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.55934/10.55934/2587-8824-2022-29-2-262-270

12. Nasambaev E.G., Akhmetalieva A.B., Nugmanova A.E., Doszhanova A.O. Growth and development of young meat breeds depending on the breed and season of birth. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2020; (2): 206–212 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/luevit

13. Kvochkin A.N., Kvochkina V.I. On the reserves for the development of beef cattle breeding. Nauka i obrazovaniye. 2021; 4(1): 169 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/gbxeyp

14. Azhmuldinov E.A., Titov M.G., Kizaev M.A., Kovalenko V.P., Babicheva I.A. Comparative evaluation of productive qualities of calf buiis of various breeds in the conditions of the feedlot. Vestnik of Buryat State Academy of Agriculture named after V.P. Philippov. 2020; (2): 53–61 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.34655/bgsha.2020.59.2.007

15. Kharlap S.Yu., Loretz O.G., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B., Maksimyuk N.N. The change in leukocyte indexes in assessing the impact of the stress factor. Current problems of biotechnology and veterinary medicine. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference of young scientists. Molodezhny: Irkutsk State University of Agriculture. 2017; 419–429 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/xzgikl

16. Gorelik O. et al. Influence of transport stress on the adaptation potential of chicken. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2020; 10(2): 260–263. https://elibrary.ru/leezaj

17. Gorelik O. et al. Dynamics of hematological indicators of chickens under stress-inducing influence. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2020; 10(2): 264–267. https://elibrary.ru/xvhtey

18. Nikolaeva O., Andreeva A., Altynbekov O., Mishukovskaya G., Ismagilova E. Probiotic drugs impact on the innate immunity factors. Journal of Global Pharma Technology. 2020; 12(1): 38–45. https://elibrary.ru/exrwaw

19. Khan A. et al. Anti-anxiety Properties of Selected Medicinal Plants. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2022; 23(8): 1041–1060. http://doi.org/10.2174/1389201022666210122125131

20. Kaizer A.A. Content of biologically active substances in pants and antlers of different age reindeers. Agricultural Biology. 2006; 41(6): 53–57 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/hvkpvp

21. Dementyev E.P. et al. The application of physical and biological stimulants in livestock breeding. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2018; 13(S10): 8325–8330. https://elibrary.ru/vldlcd

22. Khabibullin R.M., Mironova I.V., Derkho M.A., Strizhikov V.K., Strizhikova S.V., Kouassi J. Morphofunctional changes in the kidneys of mice with the use of adaptogens against the background of physical exertion. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 613: 012052. http://doi. org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012052

23. Karomatov I.Dzh. Abduvokhidov A.T. Levzeya safrolovidnaya, bolshegolovnik, the maraly root — the plant the adaptogen. Biologiya i integrativnaya meditsina. 2017; (2): 180–186 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/yjmbqr

24. Rogozhin V.V., Rogozhina T.V., Kurilyuk T.T. Immobilization of pantocrinum on soluble and insoluble carriers. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2010; (11): 41–42 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/nconxj

25. Efanova N.V., Osina L.M., Batalova S.V. Influence of molding homogenates on element and metabolic status of dogs. Innovations and Food Safety. 2019; (2): 58–63 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2019-24-2-58-63

26. Khabibullin R.M. Mironova I.V., Derkho M.A., Strizhikov V.K., Strizhikova S.V., Denisenko A.S. Morphogenesis of the internal organs of mice with the use of adaptogens and physical activity. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 613: 012053. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012053

27. Khalil A.A. et al. Hypocholesterolemic effect of microwave assisted defatted flaxseed extract in experimental rats. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2020; 10(3): 493–499. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2020.10.3.493-499

28. Mironova I.V. Khabibullin R.M., Derkho M.A., Kontsevaya S.Yu., Strizhikova S.V., Ovchinnikova E.K. Morphological changes in the muscle tissue of mice with the use of adaptogens. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 613: 012083. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012083

29. Warriss P.D., Lister D. Improvement of meat quality in pigs by beta-adrenergic blockade. Meat Science. 1982; 7(3): 183–187. http://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(82)90084-5

30. Rybalko V.P. Bankovskaya I.B., Getya A.A. Meat quality management in conditions of intensive pig rearing. Industrial & Pure-bred pig-breeding. 2005; (4): 26–28 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Mironova I.V., Khabibullin R.M., Khabibullin I.M. Morphological changes in the liver of bulls after the use of adaptogens. Agrarian science. 2024;(3):72-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-72-79

Views: 181


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X