Regional ethnic economy: features and prospects of development (on the example of Khakassia)

The socio-economic realities of today force to look for development ways at the expense of internal resources. The deployment of local systems is perspective at the regional level, because they based on the traditional economic patterns of ethnic communities inhabiting the region. Ethnoeconomical patterns are the relevant model for the geographical, spatial and socio-cultural conditions in which they were formed. This fact allows us to highly evaluate their potential. This article attempts to assess the prospects for the development of the ethnic economy of a region Khakassia. Author uses statistical data and materials of sociological survey of ethnic communities of the region (Russians, Khakass people and Shors). They have the greatest influence on the vector of ethnoeconomical development of the republic. The peculiarity of the ethnic economy of Khakassia is the high role of households of the population. They play a significant role in the agricultural sector. They produce a large amount of both vegetables and meat products. There are various programs aimed at supporting the livestock industry for both peasant (farmer) farms and personal subsidiary farms at the regional level. Representatives of the titular ethnic group (Khakass people) and indigenous small-numbered peoples (Shors) generally remain focused on traditional economic practices: cattle breeding and crafts. Author concludes that the support of the distinctive types of economic activities of these ethnic groups is necessary not only from the point of view of economic expediency, but also for the preservation of the culture of these people.

1. Akhmetov V.Ya., Berdnikova G.I., Barlybaev A.A., Rahmatulin I.M. Ethnoeconomy and its role in rise in employment of rural population. Agrarian science. 2012; (2): 10–11 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/owbvcj

2. Badmaeva N.V., Kovanova E.S. Ethno-economics as a factor in the development of regions (on the example of the Republics of Kalmykia and Buryatia). Bulletin of the Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS. 2020; (3): 294–305 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22162/2587-6503-2020-3-15-294-305

3. Oorzhak K.-D.K. Ethno-economics of Tuva: current state and sevelopment prospects. Journal of International Economic Affairs. 2019; 9(3): 1759–1774 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.9.3.40949

4. Persidskaya O.А. The role of value orientations of young Tuvans in the spatial development of the Republic of Tuva. The New Research of Tuva. 2019; (3): 41–51 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2019.3.4 5

5. Markaryan V.R. The role of the ethno-economy of the region in the socioeconomic development of the Republic of Crimea. Regional economy and management. 2020; (1): 3 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/zicyum

6. Khorolskaya T.E. Development of vectors for the development of the theory of ethnoeconomics in the context of modern social and economic transformations. Natural-Humanitarian Studies. 2019; 25: 175–178 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/luvyrf

7. Madyukova S.A., Persidskaya O.A. Ethnoeconomics in action: the experience of Tuva and Altai. ECO. 2018; (5): 45–64 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/xoheip

8. Mrikaev D.M., Tsogoeva M.I. Regional ethnoeconomy and its influence on the Russian economy’s system development. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2016; 201(4): 302–310 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/xvgvxp

9. Pechura O.V. The ethnic factor in the development of the region’s economy. Journal of the Ural State University of Economics. 2009; (2): 138–143 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/khqspx