Study of safety and probiotic properties of normal flora of the genus Lactobacillus

Relevance. Today, the search for safe, effective and promising strain cultures exhibiting high probiotic properties as the main components of pharmacological microbial agents is a relevant area. The article presents the results of the study of probiotic properties and safety indicators of the normal flora of the genus Lactobacillus.

Materials and methods. The properties of Ligilactobacillus agilis, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Ligilactobacillus salivarius, which were isolated from the caecum of turkeys, were studied as probiotic strains. Of the probiotically significant properties of beneficial microflora, the antagonistic effect on pathogenic microorganisms, adhesive and anti-adhesive properties were analyzed in cellular models (ram blood erythrocytes and intestinal enterocytes of rat embryos). The safety of the probiotic strains was assessed by their ability to produce hemolysin by seeding them on a dense nutrient medium with defibrinated ram blood, as well as by intraperitoneal administration of a suspension of the test microorganism killed by heating in its maximum concentration.

Results. A set of microbiological studies demonstrated that the studied beneficial strains exhibit probiotic properties to varying degrees. The results of studying the antagonistic properties showed that the growth inhibition zone of opportunistic microorganisms varied within 4–14 mm depending on the test culture. When analyzing adhesiveness and antiadhesion, the best results were demonstrated by the strains Ligilactobacillus agilis and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei. When assessing the safety, it was found that the studied representatives of lactic acid bacteria do not form a hemolysis zone on the nutrient medium, and when intraperitoneally administered to laboratory animals, they do not cause signs of impairment of their health or loss of body weight.

1. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B. Factorial dispersion of ontogenesis indicators on the productive qualities of a commercial herd of meat cross poultry. Vsyo o myase. 2024; (4): 58–64 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-4-58-64

2. Murtazaev K.N., Koshchaev A.G., Lysenko Yu.A., Luneva A.V., Zholobova I.S., Merenkova N.V. The influence of the method of cultivation and feeding with the use of feed additives on meat productivity and the quality of quail products. Scientific notes Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2022; 250: 139–149 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31588/2413_4201_1883_2_250_139

3. Lysenko Y., Koshchayev A., Luneva A., Omarov R., Shlykov S. Organic meat production of broiler chickens Hubbard Redbro cross. International Journal of Veterinary Science. 2021; 10(1): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijvs/2020.021

4. Rebezov Ya.M. Meat productivity of Hybrid turkey. Quality of products, technologies and education. Proceedings of the XIV International scientific and practical conference. Magnitogorsk: Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2019; 136–139 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/nxbucl

5. Rebezov Ya.M., Khayrullin M.F., Bezhinar T.I., Zinina O.V., Sereda T.I., Drapeko E.E. Technological solution for turkey meat processing. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 613: 012120. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012120

6. Rebezov Ya.M., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B. Slaughter qualities of different turkey breeds. Vestnik Kurganskoy GSKhA. 2019; (4): 39–43 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/dnkzbm

7. Igenbayev A. et al. Fatty Acid Composition of Female Turkey Muscles in Kazakhstan. Journal of World’s Poultry Research. 2019; 9(2); 78–81. https://doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2019.9

8. Morar M.A., Vayskrobova E.S., Rebezov Ya.M. Turkey meat as a therapeutic and prophylactic product in nutrition. Quality of products, technologies and education. Proceedings of the XII International scientific and practical conference. Magnitogorsk: Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2017; 53–56 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ziniel

9. Rebezov Ya.M., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B. Anatomical and morphological composition of turkey meat of heavy crosses. AgroScience-2020. Proceedings of the International scientific online conference. Novosibirsk: State Public Scientific and Technical Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020; 191–194 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/jckcdl

10. Rebezov Ya.M., Gorelik O.V., Bezhinar T.I., Safronov S.L., Vinogradova N.D., Maryanovskaya Yu.V. Features of protein metabolism in turkeys of different genotypes and age. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 613: 012119. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012119

11. Neverova O.P. et al. Influence of a biotechnological additive on the weight growth of broiler chickens. Agrarian science. 2023; (11): 70–75 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-376-11-70-75

12. Kozerod Iu.M., Vorobyeva N.V. The current state of Russian poultry production: problems and solutions. Economy, labor, management in agriculture. 2024; (5): 114–121 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33938/215-114

13. Yankina O.L., Prikhodko A.N., Kim N.A. Current trends of poultry feeding. Agrarnyy vestnik Primor′ya. 2020; (2): 64–67 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ugamfs

14. Pogodaev V.A., Rebezov M.B. Productivity and dynamics of metabolic processes in the body of young turkeys when using eubiotics based on the Bifidobacterium bifidum strain in the diet. Vsyo o myase. 2023; (3): 36–47 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2023-3-36-47

15. Rebezov Ya.M., Gorelik O.V., Kharlap S.Yu. Evaluation of safety of meat of turkeys. Vsyo o myase. 2020; (5S): 292–296 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2020-5S-292-296

16. Boysinova N., Ibragimov F., Yunusov K., Achilov O., Rasulov U. The effectiveness of using probiotics, their effect on growth and chemical composition of broiler chicken meat. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 95: 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249501013

17. Latypova E., Shatskikh E. The effect of phytobiotic preparations on the digestibility of macronutrients by laying hens. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 108: 03002. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202410803002

18. Nasimov S., Mamatova Z., Sattorov J., Safarov X., Azimova D. Effect of the use of a probiotic Innoprovet on the growth parameters of broiler chickens (Uzbekistan). BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 95: 01035. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249501035

19. Zhivoderova A., Samoylenko V., Ozheredova N., Pyanov B., Lapina A. The effect of the developed complex symbiotic composition on the immune and cytokine profile in young cattle in neonatal ontogenesis. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 113: 02012. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411302012

20. Vibe V. et al. Effect of growth medium composition on the efficiency of non-ribosomal synthesis in bacteria of the genus Bacillus. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 113: 02020. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411302020

21. Yuldasheva M., Narziev B., Mamatova Z., Khaydarova S., Shomakhsudov A. Effect of probiotic bacteria of the genus Bacillus on gnorobic pathogens of surgical infections. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 95: 01033. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249501033

22. Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B., Dolmatova I.A. Scientific approaches to feeding agricultural poultry. The future is ours: a view of young scientists on the innovative development of society. Collection of scientific articles of the 2nd All-Russian youth scientific conference. Kursk: Southwest State University. 2021; 4: 63–66 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/wuknhp

23. Sofronova O., Polyakova L. Immunomodulatory Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Glycopeptides on the Body of Rabbits. Muratov A., Ignatieva S. (eds.). Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research in the Development of Agriculture in the Far East (AFE-2021). Agricultural Innovation Systems. Cham: Springer. 2022; 2: 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91405-9_69

24. Terekhov V., Tishchenko A., Pimenov N., Ivannikova R. Immunobiological resistance and humoral protection factors in animals. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2022; 2467(1): 070067. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092550

25. Ryabchik I., Stepanishin V., Petrova Y., Ryabchik M. Levucell SB: live yeast — healthy digestion of broiler chickens. E3S Web of Conferences. 2022; 363: 03067. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303067

26. Zelenkova G. Zelenkov A., Kochetkova N. Feed additives with probiotics: development and application in bird feeding. E3S Web of Conferences. 2022; 363: 03063. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303063

27. Gracheva O.A. et al. Breeding Store Pigs with Probiotics. Beskopylny A., Shamtsyan M., Artiukh V. (eds.). XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. Global Precision Ag Innovation 2022. Cham: Springer. 2023; 1: 1836–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_200

28. Smolentsev S. et al. Effect of probiotics on height and weight parameters of young cattle. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 113: 02010. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411302010

29. Norboyev K.N., Rakhmanov U.A., Ata-Kurbanov A.E., Eshburiyev S.B. The use of Vitatonik feed additives and Bio-S3 probiotic on the productivity and resistance of laying hens. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023; 462: 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346201009

30. Osepchuk D., Semenenko M., Kuzminova E., Semenenko K. Influence of probiotic preparations on metabolic processes, enterobiasis and the level of endogenous intoxication of animals. E3S Web of Conferences. 2022; 363: 03061. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303061

31. Topuria G.M., Topuria L.Yu., Grigoryeva E.V., Rebezov M.B. Effect of probiotics on broiler-chickens productivity. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2014; (2): 143–145 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/sfsctr

32. Pavlysh A.V., Galunova T.Yu., Kachanov D.A., Lapkina G.Ya. Probiotics: Review of the current state of the problem from the standpoint of clinical pharmacology and evidence-based medicine. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2024; 22(1): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.17816/RCF321186

33. Tyurina D.G. et al. The development of antimicrobial resistance in broilers affected by veterinary antimicrobials and a probiotic administration. Agrarian science. 2024; (3): 85–91 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-85-91

34. Mosolov A.A. et al. Efficiency of the use of probiotics in comparison with antibiotics in pig breeding. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 848: 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/848/1/012067

35. Slozhenkina M.I., Fedotova A.M., Knyazhechenko O.A., Fedotova G.V., Mosolov A.A., Frolova M.V. Improving the quality of broiler chicken meat without the use of antibiotics. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 965: 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/965/1/012033

36. Kuvanov T.K., Pimenov N.V. Metaprobiotics in industrial poultry farming. Global Issues Conference 2024: Veterinary Medicine, Biology, Biotechnology, Agriculture, Pedagogical And Philological Sciences. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow: Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology — MVA named after K.I. Skryabin. 2024; 270–273 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/yiizgz

37. Shchorsova A.A., Kurmanbay A.B., Sagyndykov U.Z. Probiotics. Omarovsky Readings: Biology and Biotechnology of the 21st Century: Collection of Materials of the International Scientific Forum. Astana: L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. 2024; 16–23 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/bguccr

38. Zharkova D.Yu., Zaharov T.A. Probiotics in the diet of birds. Agricultural science and production in the context of the formation of the digital economy of the Russian Federation: materials of the International scientific and practical conference. Persianovsky: Don State Agrarian University. 2024; 2: 158–161 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/hravvg

39. Marmurova O.M. Application of pro- and prebiotics in poultry finding. Modern problems and achievements of veterinary morphology and pathology in maintaining animal health. Proceedings of the National scientific and practical conference dedicated to the anniversary of Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Suleyman M. Suleymanov. Voronezh: Voronezh State Agrarian University named after Emperor Peter I. 2024; 162–165 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/chqgfd

40. Rebezov Ya.M., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B., Kharlap S.Yu. Chemical composition of meat of turkeys of different breed groups. Ensuring technological sovereignty of the agro-industrial complex: approaches, problems, solutions. Collection of articles of the International scientific and methodological conference dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Agrarian University. 2023; 193–195 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/qnyotj

41. Shagivaleev B.R., Khaziahmetov F.S. Probiotics for growing young ducks and goose. Osnovy i perspektivy organicheskikh biotekhnologiy. 2020; (4): 53–57 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/brclex

42. Rebezov M.B., Topuria L.U., Fateeva O.O. Effect of probiotics on mineral composition of duck blood. Prospects for the development of the industry and enterprises of the agro-industrial complex: domestic and international experience. Collection of materials of the International scientific and practical conference. Omsk: Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin. 2020; 225–227 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/nwxtrf

43. Buryako I.A., Astapovich N.I., Stefanovich L.I., Safonova M.E. Isolation and selection of bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus — the basis of probiotic preparations. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and functional foods. Current status and prospects. Proceedings of the International conference. Moscow. 2004; 18–19 (in Russian).

44. Vasiliev D.A., Feoktistova N.A., Mastilenko A.V., Suldina E.V. Species identification of enterobacteria strains by means of MALDIT-Of MS. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2018; (2): 110–113 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18286/1816-4501-2018-2-110-113

45. Vetrova O.S. et al. Interaction of antibodies against the c-terminal domain of hemolysin II of Bacillus cereus with a full-length toxin reveals the features of the spatial structure of the toxin. Biology — science of the XXI century. Collection of abstracts of the 26th Pushchino School-Conference of Young Scientists with international participation. Pushchino: Pushchino Research Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023; 16–17 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/zwnryx

46. Saidov A.A. On the issue of obtaining domestic hemolysin for the complement fixation reaction. Environmental protection is the basis of national security. Collection of articles based on the materials of the International Scientific Environmental Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the KubSAU. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University. 2022; 55–56 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/azhmmi

47. Kolevatykh E.P., Katayev A.Yu. Development of a method for obtaining metabiotic preparations based on extracellular vesicles of bacteria. Actual problems of socio-economic development of modern society: Collection of articles of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Kirov: Kirov State Medical University. 2023; 538–543 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/uonnzy

48. Minnullina L.F., Misheeva P.S., Mukhtarova G.I., Sharipova M.R., Mardanova A.M. Features of hemolysin biosynthesis by Morganella morganii. Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine. 2023; 176(8): 210–215 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47056/0365-9615-2023-176-8-210-215

49. Borisova M.P. The role of the c-terminal domain of Bacillus cereus hemolysin II in the manifestation of hemolytic activity. Theoretical and experimental biophysics. Conference proceedings. Pushchino: Synchrobook. 2022; 19–20 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/jpkctp

50. Chernigova S.V., Dochilova E.S., Zubkova N.V. Monitoring of the hemostasis system in animals during hemosorption. Catalog of scientific and innovative developments of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Omsk State Agrarian University”. Series: Veterinary Science. Collection of materials based on the results of research activities. Omsk: Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin. 2021; 914–915 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/pdancz

51. Belorukova T.A. Physiological significance of hemolysis in animals. Theoretical and applied foundations of veterinary science. Collection of works of the scientific and practical conference of students of the Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. Novosibirsk: Zolotoy kolos. 2024; 28–31 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/pjvdmr

52. Mikhaylova D.M. et al. Exogenous gemini hematin causes erythrocyte spherification and hemolysis. Systems biology and physiology. 2022; (S1): 42 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/dclrfh

53. Kuvardin N.V., Niyazi F.F. Action of hyper small dozes of hemolyzing solution on erythrocytes membranes. Russian journal of chemistry and chemical technology. 2007; 50(8): 53–56 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/iapnwv

54. Gagaro M.A. Correction of hemostasis derangements and lipoperoxidation at activation of blood coagulaition. Bulletin Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2007; 27(5): 122–125 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/jvmdnb