The effect of the lipase enzyme on rumen metabolism and nutrient absorption in bull calves aged 14–15 months
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-395-06-60-66
Abstract
Lipase is an enzyme that is responsible for the breakdown of fats into glycerol and free fatty acids. These products are then absorbed into the gastrointestinal tract of the animal and are involved in the formation of specific fat compositions for each species, which are then used by the body as an energy source or deposited in the underlying tissues and internal organs. The aim of the study was to study the effect of lipase exoenzyme in dosages of 25 g/t and 50 g/t on rumen metabolism and nutrient absorption in ruminants. The objects of research are cicatricial fluid (RJ) obtained from Kazakh white-headed bull calves with an average weight of 310–320 kg at the age of 14–15 months (4 heads in each group). Exoenzyme preparation: experimental group I — lipase 25 g/t; experimental group II — lipase 50 g/t.
With an increase in the concentration of lipase in feed, the level of total nitrogen in the rumen content increases significantly, in the II experimental group this indicator was 99.42 mmol/l, which is 24.55% higher than in the I experimental group and 50.60% (p < 0.05) higher than in the control. The digestibility of dry matter in the first experimental group was higher by 6.09% (p < 0.05), crude protein — by 5.22%, crude fiber — by 6.10% (p < 0.05), as well as the level of assimilation of essential and macronutrients relative to the control group. Thus, lipase is a powerful digestive stimulant for animals. This can affect the growth and development of calves and reduce the cost of feed, as the efficiency of using fat, which is contained in the main raw materials of the diet, increases significantly.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. V. GrechkinaRussian Federation
Viktoria Vladimirovna Grechkina, Candidate of Biological Sciences
29 January 9th Str., Orenburg, 460000
18 Chelyuskintsev Str., Orenburg, 460014
E. V. Sheida
Russian Federation
Elena Vladimirovna Sheida, Candidate of Biological Sciences
29 January 9th Str., Orenburg, 460000
13 Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018
O. V. Kvan
Russian Federation
Olga Vilorievna Kvan, Candidate of Biological Sciences
29 January 9th Str., Orenburg, 460000
13 Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018
L. Yu. Topuria
Russian Federation
Larisa Yurievna Topuria, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
13 Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018
References
1. Dai Z. et al. Fermentation techniques in feed production. Bazer F.W., Lamb G.C., Wu G. (eds.). Animal Agriculture. Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations. Academic Press. 2020; 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00024-0
2. Bajpai P. Lignocellulosic Biomass in Biotechnology. Elsevier. 2021; xvi: 232. ISBN 978-0-12-821889-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04439-1
3. Silva L.G. et al. Effects of flaxseed and chia seed on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and long-chain fatty acid flow in a dual-flow continuous culture system. Journal of.Animal Science. 2016; 94(4): 1600–1609. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9750
4. Wang C., Shi C., Zhang Y., Song D., Lu Z., Wang Y. Microbiota in fermented feed and swine gut. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018; 102(7): 2941–2948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8829-4
5. Gündel S.d.S. et al. Nanoemulsions containing Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oil: Development, characterization, stability study and evaluation of antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018; 118: 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.043
6. Liang J. et al. Promising biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to renewable energy with rumen microorganisms: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020; 134: 110335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110335
7. Nagler M., Kozjek K., Etemadi M., Insam H., Podmirseg S.M. Simple yet effective: Microbial and biotechnological benefits of rumen liquid addition to lignocellulose-degrading biogas plants. Journal of.Biotechnology. 2019; 300: 1‒10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.05.004
8. Chi C.-H., Cho S.-J. Improvement of bioactivity of soybean meal by solid‐state fermentation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens versus Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT.— Food Science and Technology. 2016; 68: 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.002
9. Heath R.D., Cockerell C., Mankoo R., Ibdah J.A., Tahan V. Fecal microbiota transplantation and its potential therapeutic uses in gastrointestinal disorders. Northern Clinics of.Istanbul. 2018; 5(1): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2017.10692
10. Kiesz M.E. The effectiveness of fermented soybean meal and (or) rapeseed meal in sows and weaners feeding. Summary of PhD thesis. Lublin. 2019; 28 (in Polish).
11. Ran T., Gomaa W.M.S., Shen Y.Z., Saleem A.M., Yang W.Z., McAllister T.A. Use of naturally sourced feed additives (lactobacillus fermentation products and enzymes) in growing and finishing steers: Effects on performance, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2019; 254: 114190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.05.013
12. Nguyen L.N. et al. Application of rumen and anaerobic sludge microbes for bio harvesting from lignocellulosic biomass. Chemosphere. 2019; 228: 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.159
13. Azlan P.M., Jahromi M.F., Ariff M.O., Ebrahimi M., Candyrine S.C.L., Liang J.B. Aspergillus terreus treated rice straw suppresses methane production and enhances feed digestibility in goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2018; 50(3): 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1470-x
14. Sheida E.V., Duskaev G.K., Miroshnikov S.A., Miroshnikov I.S., Proskurin D.A., Ovechkin M.V. Design and operation of a bioreactor for processing plant waste. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023; 106(3): 179–189 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-3-179
15. Allin K.H. et al. Aberrant intestinal microbiota in individuals with prediabetes. Diabetologia. 2018; 61(4): 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4550-1
16. Meijnikman A.S., Gerdes V.E., Nieuwdorp M., Herrema H. Evaluating Causality of Gut Microbiota in Obesity and Diabetes in Humans. Endocrine Reviews. 2018; 39(2): 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2017-00192
17. Liu B. et al. Response of Gut Microbiota to Dietary Fiber and Metabolic Interaction With SCFAs in Piglets. Frontiers in.Microbiology. 2018; 9: 2344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02344
18. Štúrova Yu.G., Grishkova A.V. Study of activity of pregastric lipases. Polzunovskiy vestnik. 2019; (4): 29‒33 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/zvmnlt
19. Salnikova E.V., Miroshnikov A.M., Osipova E.A., Kudakaev I.R., Zhorov D.S., Kustova A.S. Heavy metals in chains “animal — feed — man” in case of Orenburg region. Vestnik of.the Orenburg state university. 2013; (6): 10‒12 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/raqosj
20. Duskayev G.K., Miroshnikov S.A., Sizova E.A., Lebedev S.V., Notova S.V. The influence of heavy metals on the organism of animals and the environment (review).Herald of.beef cattle breeding. 2014; (3): 7‒10 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ssyijr
21. Shcherbinin S. Exogenous lipase for forage cost reduction. Animal Husbandry of.Russia. 2022; (10): 52‒53 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/gvmgak
Review
For citations:
Grechkina V.V., Sheida E.V., Kvan O.V., Topuria L.Yu. The effect of the lipase enzyme on rumen metabolism and nutrient absorption in bull calves aged 14–15 months. Agrarian science. 2025;1(6):60-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-395-06-60-66