Comparative analysis of the phenotypic variability of chickens of different productivity directions
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-396-07-92-100
Abstract
In poultry, chicken exterior evaluation is necessary to determine the compliance of chickens with breed standards, productivity direction and to asses genetic diversity. The object of the study were hens of Tsarskoye Selo (Ts), Pushkin (Pus), Russian White (RW), Novopavlovo gold (NG), Cochin Dwarf (CD) and Silky (S) breeds. Long-leggedness index (LLI) and eurisomy index (EI) were calculated based on body measurements. Our studies showed that chickens of different productivity directions vary in values of live weight, linear body measurements and the degree of expression of their relationships. Dual-purpose breeds were characterized by the greatest leg length. The lowest LLI was observed in CCs (49.2%), and they appeared to have the widest and thickest constitution according to EI. The CD surpassed PG by 24.5%, S by 24.4%, and RW by 12.2% on this index. A greater number of reliable correlations between body measurements was obtained for RW hens, which indirectly indicates a high potential of egg productivity in this breed. Fancy chicken breeds showed a smaller number of reliable correlations, and the traits “chest girth”, “metatarsus girth” had a weak correlation in contrast to productive breeds. The greatest number of positive correlations was obtained for CD. The results of cluster analysis indicate that chickens of different productivity exhibit specific exterior traits, which can be modeled by analyzing body measurement data.
Supporting agencies: The research was conducted within the framework of the scientific research of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation on topic No. 124020200114-7.
About the Authors
A. B. Vakhrameev
Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anatoly Borisovich Vakhrameev, Chief Breeder of the Chicken Gene Pool Conservation Group
55А Moskovskoe Shosse, village Tyarlevo, St. Petersburg, 196625
M. V. Pozovnikova
Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina Vladimirovna Pozovnikova, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics
55А Moskovskoe Shosse, village Tyarlevo, St. Petersburg, 196625
A. E. Ryabova
Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna Evgenievna Ryabova, Postgraduate Student in the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics
55А Moskovskoe Shosse, village Tyarlevo, St. Petersburg, 196625
Z. L. Fedorova
Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zoya Leonidovna Fedorova, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Specialist
55А Moskovskoe Shosse, village Tyarlevo, St. Petersburg, 196625
N. V. Dementieva
Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia Viktorovna Dementieva, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics
55А Moskovskoe Shosse, village Tyarlevo, St. Petersburg, 196625
References
1. Lawal R.A., Hanotte O. Domestic chicken diversity: Origin, distribution, and adaptation. Animal Genetics. 2021; 52(4): 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13091
2. Núñez-León D. et al. Shifts in growth, but not differentiation, foreshadow the formation of exaggerated forms under chicken domestication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2021; 288(1953): 20210392. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0392
3. Ebegbulem V.N., Ita U.R. Conservation of Genetic Diversity: It’s Relevance in Poultry Production. Animal Molecular Breeding. 2016; 6(3): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1098/10.5376/amb.2016.06.0003
4. Botchway P.K. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of three local chicken ecotypes of Ghana based on principal component analysis and body measurements. PLoS ONE. 2024; 19(8): e0308420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308420
5. Adomako K., Sovi S., Kyei B., Hamidu J.A., Olympio O.S., Aggrey S.E. Phenotypic characterization and analysis of genetic diversity between commercial crossbred and indigenous chickens from three different agro-ecological zones using DArT-Seq technology. PLoS ONE. 2024; 19(5): e0297643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297643
6. Morris K.M. et al. Phenotypic and genomic characterisation of performance of tropically adapted chickens raised in smallholder farm conditions in Ethiopia. Frontiers in Genetics. 2024; 15: 1383609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1383609
7. Sevastyanova A.A., Alexandrov A.V. On the use of marker genes for consolidation of characteristic exterior traits in purebred Russian local chicken breeds. Ptitsevodstvo. 2022; (12): 16–21 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2022-71-12-16-21
8. Vakhrameev A.B., Makarova A.V. Exterior evaluation of chickens. Dubrovitsy: L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry. 2021; 1 CD-ROM (in Russian). ISBN 978-5-902483-64-9 https://www.elibrary.ru/rfbyiq
9. Egorova A.V. The exterior traits in broiler breeders. Ptitsevodstvo. 2018; (7): 9–11 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ynjukl
10. Lacková Z. et al. Deviations of exterior characters from breeding standards of chicken — part II: miniature and ornamental breeds. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology. 2023; 7(1): 8–13. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2023.07.00184
11. Halás Š. et al. Deviations of exterior characters from breeding standards of chicken — part I: medium-weight breeds. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology. 2023; 7(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2023.07.00183
12. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B., Vidyakin Yu.Yu. Dynamics of indicators of linear growth and physique indices of marketable young beef poultry depending on live weight at day old. Agrarian science. 2023; (10): 68–72 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-68-72
13. Vetokh A.N., German N.Yu. Chicken egg incubation results and growth rate of crossbreed chickens. Agrarian science. 2022; (1): 53–57 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-355-1-53-57
14. Bondarenko Yu.V., Kalashnik А.N., Popsui V.V. Genetic peculiarities of comb shape of Gallus poultry. Zootechnical Science of Belarus. 2020; 55(1): 41–59 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/phryze
15. Begna D., Bacha T., Boki S., Bekana K. Characterization of indigenous chicken phenotypes in Liban Jawi District, Ethiopia: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. PLoS ONE. 2025; 20(1): e0307793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307793
16. Pulcini D., Meo Zilio D., Cenci F., Castellini C., Guarino Amato M. Differences in Tibia Shape in Organically Reared Chicken Lines Measured by Means of Geometric Morphometrics. Animals. 2021; 11(1): 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010101
17. Weimer S.L., Mauromoustakos A., Karcher D.M., Erasmus M.A. Differences in performance, body conformation, and welfare of conventional and slow-growing broiler chickens raised at 2 stocking densities. Poultry Science. 2020; 99(9): 4398–4407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.009
18. Guo J. et al. Genome-wide association study provides insights into the genetic architecture of bone size and mass in chickens. Genome. 2020; 63(3): 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2019-0022
19. Tikhonova N.V., Kudryashov L.S., Vaganov E.G., Miftakhutdinov A.V., Pershina E.I. Stress resistance, productivity and biological value of chickens. Meat Industry. 2014; (12): 44–46 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/teveqz
20. Vakhrameev A.B. et al. Pectoral angle: a glance at a traditional phenotypic trait in chickens from a new perspective. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2023; 161(4): 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185962300045X
21. Mushi J.R. et al. Phenotypic variability and population structure analysis of Tanzanian free-range local chickens. BMC Veterinary Research. 2020; 16: 360. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02541-x
22. Kebede F.G., Komen H., Dessie T., Alemu S.W., Hanotte O., Bastiaansen J.W.M. Species and Phenotypic Distribution Models Reveal Population Differentiation in Ethiopian Indigenous Chickens. Frontiers in Genetics. 2021; 12: 723360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.723360
Review
For citations:
Vakhrameev A.B., Pozovnikova M.V., Ryabova A.E., Fedorova Z.L., Dementieva N.V. Comparative analysis of the phenotypic variability of chickens of different productivity directions. Agrarian science. 2025;(7):92-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-396-07-92-100
Views:
40
Email this article 