Rice pyriculariasis: monitoring, prognosis of its spread in the Krasnodar Territory
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-401-12-138-146
Abstract
Blast (causative agent — ascomycete fungus Pyricularia oryzae Cav.) is the most dangerousand harmful disease of rice, widespread in most rice-growing regions of the world, includingRussia. For 10 years (2013–2022), the condition of rice crops was monitored in ricegrowing farms of the Krasnodar Territory. At the infection site, under artificial infection, theimmunological properties of 13,158 variety samples transferred by breeders of the FederalRice Research Center and the Collection of Genetic Resources of Rice, Vegetable and MelonCrops were studied. The resistance was assessed on a ten-point scale of the InternationalRice Institute (IRRI) using visual and immunological diagnostics, as well as phytopathologicalobservation. The ranges and optimal values of environmental factors contributing to variousstages of the Pyricularia oryzae life cycle were established. It has been shown that for theeffective germination of conidia, the formation of apressoria and the penetration of thepathogen into plant tissues, the temperature in the range of 25–28 °C, relative humidity (above89%) and prolonged moistening of the leaf surface (at least 6 hours) are of key importance.The analysis showed that among the studied variety samples, 11.3% are resistant to blast,38.4% are moderately resistant, and 50.3% are susceptible. The paper presents a quantitativepredictive model reflecting the transformation of the varietal composition of rice classified bythe level of resistance to the fungus Piricularia oryzae, which serves as a scientific basis for thedevelopment of an adaptive breeding strategy. Of particular importance in this strategy is theselection of resistant varieties that provide built-in protection, reducing the need for chemicalfungicides and contributing to a stable yield. A promising direction is the creation of genotypescarrying R-genes of a wide range of resistance.
About the Authors
O. A. BraginaRussian Federation
Olesya Anatolyevna Bragina, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher
3 Belozerny Settlement, Krasnodar, 350921
M. D. Goverdovskaya
Russian Federation
Maria Dmitrievna Goverdovskaya, Junior Researcher
3 Belozerny Settlement, Krasnodar, 350921
I. A. Lysko
Russian Federation
Irina Anatolyevna Lysko, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher
3 Belozerny Settlement, Krasnodar, 350921
L. V. Esaulova
Russian Federation
Lyubov Vladimirovna Esaulova, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Deputy Director for Scientific Work
3 Belozerny Settlement, Krasnodar, 350921
References
1. Ballini E. et al. A genome-wide meta-analysis of rice blastresistance genes and quantitative trait loci provides new insightsinto partial and complete resistance. Molecular Plant-MicrobeInteractions. 2008; 21(7): 859–868.https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-7-0859
2. Klaubauf S. et al. Resolving the polyphyletic nature of Pyricularia(Pyriculariaceae). Studies in Mycology. 2014; 79: 85–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.004
3. Tosa Y., Chuma I. Classification and parasitic specialization of blastfungi. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2014; 80(3): 202–209.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-014-0513-7
4. Ou S.H. Disease resistance in rice. Mutation Breeding for DiseaseResistance. Vienna: IAEA. 1971; 78–85.
5. Gómez-Ariza J. et al. Sucrose-mediated priming of plant defenseresponses and broad-spectrum disease resistance by overexpressionof the maize pathogenesis-related PRms protein in rice plants.Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2007; 20(7): 832–842.https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-7-0832
6. Bragina O.A., Ogly A.M. Resistance of rice varieties to the pathogenpyricularia in differentagroecological conditions of KrasnodarTerritory. Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2020;84: 95–99 (in Russian).https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-84-95-99
7. U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research on the International PathogenicRaces of the Rice Blast Fungus, Piricularia Oryzae Cav., and theirInternational Differentials. Annals of the Phytopathological Society ofJapan. 1967; 33(S): 1–87.
8. Kato H. et al. Pathogenicity, Mating Ability and DNA RestrictionFragment Length Polymorphisms of Pyricularia Populations Isolatedfrom Gramineae, Bambusideae and Zingiberaceae Plants. Journal ofGeneral Plant Pathology. 2000; 66(1): 30–47.https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012919
9. Murata N., Aoki T., Kusaba M., Tosa Y., Chuma I. Various speciesof Pyricularia constitute a robust clade distinct from Magnaporthesalvinii and its relatives in Magnaporthaceae. Journal of General PlantPathology. 2014; 80(1): 66–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-013-0477-z
10. Nürnberger T., Brunner F., Kemmerling B., Piater L. Innateimmunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obviousdifferences. Immunological Reviews. 2004; 198(1): 249–266.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x
11. Okagaki L.H. et al. Genome Sequences of Three PhytopathogenicSpecies of the Magnaporthaceae Family of Fungi. G3Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 2015; 5(12): 2539–2545.https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.020057
12. Rijal S., Devkota Y. A review on various management methodsof rice blast disease. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture.2020; 4(1): 29–33.https://doi.org/10.26480/mjsa.01.2020.29.33
13. Choudhary S., Ghasolia R.P. Effect of Alternaria alternata on seedgermination and seedling vigour. International Journal of Agricultureand Nutrition. 2023; 5(1-A): 12–14.https://doi.org/10.33545/26646064.2023.v5.i1a.91
Review
For citations:
Bragina O.A., Goverdovskaya M.D., Lysko I.A., Esaulova L.V. Rice pyriculariasis: monitoring, prognosis of its spread in the Krasnodar Territory. Agrarian science. 2025;(12):138-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-401-12-138-146
JATS XML



































