Phenotypic changes in biofilm formation of Escherichia coli under the influence of antibacterial drugs and their combinations
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2026-411-10-25-31
Abstract
This study examined the effects of subinhibitory concentrations of the fluoroquinolones enrofloxacin and levofloxacin, as well as their combination, on the formation of bacterial biofilms in Escherichia coli upon induction of the SOS response. The study involved 46 clinical isolates of E. coli, isolated from various farm animal habitats, as well as the reference strain E. coli JW5503 (ΔtolC), carrying the TurboRFP fluorescent reporter system. Biofilm formation was quantified using gentian violet staining followed by optical density measurement, and SOS response activation was recorded using a transilluminator and fluorescence microscopy. It was found that the optical density of the reference strain increased from 0.26 ± 0.05 to 0.50 ± 0.04 (an increase of 92.3%; p < 0.05) under the influence of enrofloxacin, and to 0.462 ± 0.06 (an increase of 76.9%; p < 0.05) under the influence of levofloxacin, which corresponded to the transition from a low to a moderate degree of biofilm formation. Upon exposure of the studied clinical isolates to enrofloxacin (0.125 µg/mL), the maximum increase in biofilm biomass was observed, amounting to 40.2% (p < 0.01), whereas levofloxacin induced a dose-dependent decrease in this parameter by 39.8% at a concentration of 0.25 µg/mL (p < 0.01). Combined administration of enrofloxacin and levofloxacin to the clinical isolates resulted in the most pronounced enhancement of biofilm formation, reaching 61.2% relative to control values (p < 0.01).
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. AntonevskiyRussian Federation
Igor Viktorovich Antonevskiy, Candidate of in Veterinary Sciences, Assistant Department of Veterinary
1 Institutskaya square, Omsk, 644008
N. A. Lescheva
Russian Federation
Nadezhda Alekseevna Lescheva, Candidate of in Veterinary Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department
1 Institutskaya square, Omsk, 644008
V. I. Pleshakova
Russian Federation
Valentina Ivanovna Pleshakova, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor
1 Institutskaya square, Omsk, 644008
E. V. Frick
Russian Federation
Elizabeth Vyacheslavovna Frik, Postgraduate Student
1 Institutskaya square, Omsk, 644008
References
1. Antonevskiy I.V., Pleshakova V.I. Structural and functional features of bacterial biofilms in farm animals and livestock infrastructure. Vestnik of Omsk SAU. 2023; (1): 74–83 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.48136/2222_0364_2023_1_74
2. Pavlova I.B., Antonova A.N., Lenchenko E.M. Research of biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria. Problems of veterinary sanitation, hygiene and ecology. 2016; (2): 63–70 (in Russian). EDN WFBIDF
3. Plotnikov P.V., Movsesyan N.A., Lepteeva T.N., Torosyan T.A., Ziamko V.Y., Ilyin E.A. Immunity and bacterial biofilms: current status of the matter (literature review). Vestnik of Vitebsk State Medical University. 2021; 20(3): 7–15 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2021.3.7
4. Dhaouadi S. et al. High Biofilm-Forming Ability and Clonal Dissemination among Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Cows with Mastitis, Diarrheic Calves, and Chickens with Colibacillosis in Tunisia. Life. 2023; 13(2): 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020299
5. Stanford K., Tran F., Zhang P., Yang X. Biofilm-Forming Capacity of Escherichia coli Isolated from Cattle and Beef Packing Plants: Relation to Virulence Attributes, Stage of Processing, Antimicrobial Interventions, and Heat Tolerance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2021; 87(23): e01126-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01126-21
6. Ushakov V.Yu. SOS-system of DNA repair in bacteria. Bulletin of Perm University. Biology. 2010; (2): 19–30 (in Russian). EDN OIOGQB
7. Dawan J., Ahn J. Bacterial Stress Responses as Potential Targets in Overcoming Antibiotic Resistance. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(7): 1385. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071385
8. Kaushik V., Tiwari M., Tiwari V. Interaction of RecA mediated SOS response with bacterial persistence, biofilm formation, and host response. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2022; 217: 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.176
9. Recacha E. et al. Suppression of the SOS response modifies spatiotemporal evolution, post-antibiotic effect, bacterial fitness and biofilm formation in quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2019; 74(1): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky407
10. Gao P. et al. Subinhibitory Concentrations of Antibiotics Exacerbate Staphylococcal Infection by Inducing Bacterial Virulence. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022; 10(4): e00640-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00640-22
11. Ismail A.S. et al. The tradeoffs between persistence and mutation rates at sub-inhibitory antibiotic concentrations in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology Spectrum. 2025; 13(4): e02479-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02479-24
12. Stepanović S., Vuković D., Dakić I., Savić B., Švabić-Vlahović M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2000; 40(2): 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6
13. Bernardi S. et al. Subinhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations Enhance Biofilm Formation of Clinical Enterococcus faecalis Isolates. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(7): 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070874
14. Teichmann L., Luitwieler S., Bengtsson-Palme J., ter Kuile B. Fluoroquinolone-specific resistance trajectories in E. coli and their dependence on the SOS-response. BMC Microbiology. 2025; 25: 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03771-5
15. Teichmann L., Pasman R., Luitwieler S., Varriale C., Bengtsson-Palme J., Ter Kuile B. Adaptation of Escherichia coli to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin: Differential proteomics of the SOS response and RecA-independent mechanisms. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2025; 65(2): 107420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107420
16. Balaji K., Thenmozhi R., Pandian S.K. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of fluoroquinolones on biofilm production by clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2013; 137(5): 963–971.
17. Brothers K.M. et al. Dose optimization in surgical prophylaxis: subinhibitory dosing of vancomycin increases rates of biofilm formation and the rates of surgical site infection. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 4593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30951-y
18. Podlesek Z., Žgur Bertok D. The DNA Damage Inducible SOS Response Is a Key Player in the Generation of Bacterial Persister Cells and Population Wide Tolerance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020; 11: 1785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01785
19. Ching C., Orubu E.S.F., Sutradhar I., Wirtz V.J., Boucher H.W., Zaman M.H. Bacterial antibiotic resistance development and mutagenesis following exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of fluoroquinolones in vitro: a systematic review of the literature. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2020; 2(3): dlaa068. https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa068
20. Bernier S.P. et al. Starvation, Together with the SOS Response, Mediates High Biofilm-Specific Tolerance to the Fluoroquinolone Ofloxacin. PLOS Genetics. 2013; 9(1): e1003144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003144
Review
For citations:
Antonevskiy I.V., Lescheva N.A., Pleshakova V.I., Frick E.V. Phenotypic changes in biofilm formation of Escherichia coli under the influence of antibacterial drugs and their combinations. Agrarian science. 2026;1(10):25-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2026-411-10-25-31
JATS XML


































