Intravital productivity and slaughter indicators of pigs of domestic, Canadian and French breeds
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-337-4-20-24
Abstract
Relevance and methods. During 2010–2015 in conditions of large pigbreeding complexes of Open Joint Stock Company “Smolmyaso” — Smolensk Region, limited liability company “Stupinsky Meat Processing Plant” and agricultural production cooperative “Mashkino” — Moscow Region a research and production experiment was conducted to determine the intravital productivity and slaughter indicators of young pigs of Russian, Canadian and French breeding. Experimental youngsters from 2 month age to a live weight of 100 kg were contained under conditions of control growing. The conditions of keeping, feeding and slaughter of young pigs were identical. When pigs reached a live weight of 95-105 kg they were evaluated on their own productivity and slaughter indicators.
Results. It was found that among young Russian, Canadian and French breeds, the three-breed crossbreeds obtained by crossing two-breed cross-breeding sows with boars of the Duroc breed were characterized by the highest early maturity and growth rate. The results of the control slaughter showed that the three-breed crossbreeds of young Canadian and French breeding were also characterized by the best slaughter parameters. It was established that young pigs of Canadian and French breeding are more precocious and have better slaughter rates than young stock of domestic breeding. Based on the obtained research results, it is recommended to use Canadian and French pigs more widely to obtain commercial young pigs with high fattening and meat qualities.
About the Author
G. A. Funikov
PKOO Viskotypak N.V.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Сandidate of Аgricultural Sciences, Executive Director
25/9, Sivtsev Vrazhek, Moscow, Russia, 127322
References
1. Belousov N. Effective development of pig breeding. Pig breeding. 2016;(2):66–67. (In Russ.)
2. Grikshas S.A. Ways and methods of increasing breeding and productive qualities of specialized lines and types of pigs and their effectiveness in hybridization. Monograph. M.: FGOU VPO MGAU, 2011. 116 p. (In Russ.)
3. Suslina E.N. The state and development of the domestic pig breeding sector. Pig Production. 2017;(4):4–6. (In Russ.)
4. Russia took the 5th place in the world in pork production [Electronic resource] - Electron. text data - Access mode: http://www.servis-expo.ru/news/rossiya-vyshla-na-5-mesto-v-mire-poproizvodstvu-svininy/, admission is free. - Zagl. from the screen (accessed: 12.29.2016).
5. Enter the TOP 5 world pork exporters: myth or reality. (In Russ.)
6. Tatulov Yu.V., Kolomiyets NN, Rozanov A.V., Grikshas S.A. To the problem of creating industrially suitable pig genotypes. Meat Industry. 2001;(1):40–42. (In Russ.)
7. Chernukha I.M., Tatulov Yu.V., Veselov P.P., Sus I.V., Grikshas S.A., Kolomiyets N.N. Recommendations on the use of industrially suitable genotypes of pigs in the meat industry. M .: Publishing House of the Moscow Art Academy, 2004. P.8. (In Russ.)
8. Funikov G.A. Productivity and quality of large white breed pig meat with purebred breeding and cross breeding with large black breeds, landrace and duroc: abstract ... dis. can S.-kh. Sciences, Moscow, 2001. 17 p. (In Russ.)
9. Vodyannikov V.I., Shkalenko V.V., Ruzheinikov F.V., Zemlyakov R.N. Productivity and quality of Canadian pig meat in the conditions of the Lower Volga region. Pig production. 2010;(6):14–15. (In Russ.)
10. Gubanova N.S. Biological and productive features of Canadian selection pigs: abstract ... dis. can biol. sciences. M., 2013. (In Russ.)
11. Fredeen X.T. Breed structure and population dynamics of the Canadian Yorkshire pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1969, 49(3): 291–304 (doi: 10.4141/cjas69–040).
12. Grikshas S.A., Kalashnikov V.V., Dzhanibekova G.K., Funikov G.A., Ovchinnikov A.V., Kulmakova N.I., Yepifanov V.T., Khramtsov V.V., Sarimbekov S.N., Yerezhepova M. Sh. The bulletin the national academy of sciences of the republic of Kazakhstan. 2019; 5(381):36–42.
13. Grikshas S.A., Petrov G.A., Funikov G.A. A comprehensive assessment of the productivity and quality of domestic and Western pig meat. Izvestia TSHA. 2009;(3):123–131. (In Russ.)
14. Grikshas S., Cherekaeva E. Organoleptic evaluation of pig meat of various breeds and breed combinations. Pig production. 2005;(3):6–7. (In Russ.)
15. Norms and rations for feeding farm animals. Reference manual. 3rd edition revised and expanded. / Ed. A.P. Kalashnikova, V.I. Fisinina, V.V. Scheglova, N.I. Kleimenova. Moscow. 2003. 456 p. (In Russ.)
16. Methodological recommendations of VASKHNIL on the assessment of meat productivity, meat quality and subcutaneous fat of pigs. M.: VASKHNIL, 1978. 43 p. (In Russ.)
17. Gataulin A.M. The system of applied statistical and mathematical methods for processing experimental data in agriculture. In 2 parts. M., 1992. (In Russ.)
18. Svechin K.B. Individual development of farm animals. Kiev, 1976. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Funikov G.A. Intravital productivity and slaughter indicators of pigs of domestic, Canadian and French breeds. Agrarian science. 2020;(4):20-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-337-4-20-24
Views:
399
Email this article 