Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

Morphophysiological parameters of late maturing wheat genotypes with various yield and dry resistance

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-337-4-56-59

Abstract

The article considers the selection of high-yielding and drought-tolerant forms of genotypes with different morphological properties, different periods of ripeness under the influence of stress factors, development of recommendations for use as primary material in breeding. As the studied object, 12 wheat genotypes were used, divided by 4 genotypes in each group, differing by ripening periods. The results of the research allow direct assessment of drought resistance by a number of possible complex methods, which allow to predict not only various aspects of drought tolerance in the early stages of wheat development, but also their potential productivity.

About the Authors

T. H. Tamrazov
Department of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Research Institute of Crop Husbandry; Department of Selection, Scientific Research Institute of Vegetable Growing Plant
Azerbaijan
Baku


F. A. Khudayev
Department of Plant Breeding Research Institute of Crop Husbandry
Azerbaijan
Baku


References

1. Aliyev J.А. Physiological leaves of what breeding tolerant to water stress wheat in global environment рroceedings of the 6th intern. Wheat conference Jun 5-9/26. 2000, Budapest. Hungary, V.9. p. 693-698

2. Beadle C L, Jarvis PG. Effects of shoot water status on some photosynthetic partial processes in Sitka spruce. Physiologia Plantarum. 1977; 41: 7–13.

3. Björkman O, Powles SB. Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions under water stress: interaction with light level. Planta. 1984;161:490–504.

4. Brodribb T. Dynamics of changing intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) during drought and determination of minimum functional Ci. Plant Physiology. 1996;111:179–185.

5. Cornic G, Massacci A. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR, ed. Photosynthesis and the Environment. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1996.

6. Flexas J, Escalona JM, Medrano H. Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulations in grapevines. Plant, Cell and Environment. 1999b;22:39–48.

7. Gunasekera D, Berkowitz GA. Use of transgenic plants with Rubisco antisense DNA to evaluate the rate limitation of photosynthesis under water stress. Plant Physiology.1993;103:629–35.

8. Johnson R C, Mornhinweg DW, Ferris DM, Heitholt JJ. Leaf photosynthesis and conductance of selected Triticum species at different water potentials. Plant Physiology. 1987;83:1014–1017.

9. Lawlor D.W. Integration of biochemical processes in the physiology of water stressed plants. In: Marcelle R, Clijters H, von Puche M, eds. Effects of stress on photosynthesis. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers. 1983.

10. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulías J, Flexas J. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: the stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Annals of Botany (in press). 2002.

11. Tamraz H. Tamrazov. The research of drought influence to the devolepment dynamics of wheat plant and to the change of morphophysiological indicators. International conference on. New Approaches in Biotechnology & Biosciences "NABB-2016"-feb (18-20. 2016;11.)


Review

For citations:


Tamrazov T.H., Khudayev F.A. Morphophysiological parameters of late maturing wheat genotypes with various yield and dry resistance. Agrarian science. 2020;(4):56-59. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-337-4-56-59

Views: 476


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X