Aspects of using interspecific hybridization of goats
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-340-7-35-38
Abstract
Hybridization between individuals of different species and subspecies plays an important role in evolutionary processes. In natural conditions, hybridization is observed in 10% of animal species. Hybridization acts as a source of genetic variability, and also allows us to establish some patterns of inheritance and clarify the phylogenetic origin of animals. The purpose of this review is to search for information about the hybridization of domestic goats with wild ones and the possibilities of its rational use. Analysis of the literature data showed the presence of traces of hybridization between domestic goats and chamois, domestic goats and ibex, domestic goats and tours. In some cases, hybridization leads to the manifestation of the effect of heterosis, hybrids have an increase in live weight and size compared to the original forms. In other cases, hybridization can lead to a weakening of resistance to parasites and diseases, malformations. Thus, hybridization of domestic and wild species can be used for breeding new breeds and lines of animals, allows to increase endurance and adaptive abilities, but should be used with caution, in order to avoid getting hybrid individuals into the nature.
About the Authors
Yu. A. Prytkov
Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Prytkov
B. S. Iolchiev
Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Baylar S. Iolchiev
N. A. Volkova
Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L.K. Ernst
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Volkova
References
1. Rieseberg L.H., Carney S.E. Plant hybridization. New Phytologist.1998;(140):599–624.
2. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends in Ecology & Evolution.2005;(20):229–237.
3. Lopyrin A.I., Loginova N.V., Inyakova A.P. The experience of crossing sheep and goats with round and sulfur. Proceedings of the Teberdinsky state. reserve.1960;(2):305–309. (In Russ.)
4. Inyakova, A.P. On the issue of reproduction of the Western Caucasian tour of SargcaucasicaGuld in captivity. Proceedings of the Teberdinsky state. reserve.1957; (1): 269-270. (In Russ.)
5. Ropiquet A., Hassanin A. Hybrid origin of the Pliocene ancestor of wild goats. MolPhylogenetEvol. 2006;(41):395-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.033.
6. Randi E. Detecting hybridization between wild species and their domesticated relatives. Mol Ecol. 2008;(17):285-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03417.x.
7. McGinnity P., Prodoehl P., Ferguson A., Hynes R., Maoiléidigh N.O., Baker N., Cotter D., O’Hea B., Cooke D., Rogan G., Taggart T., Cross T. Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc R SocLond B Biol Sci.2003;(270):2443-2450.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2520.
8. Hutchings J.A., Fraser D.J. The nature of fisheriesand farming-induced evolution. Mol Ecol. 2008;(17):294-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03485.x.
9. Wiley C, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L: Effects of hybridization on the immunity of collared Ficedulaalbicollis and pied flycatchers F. hypoleuca, and their infection by haemosporidians. JAvianBiol.2009;(40):352-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04741.x.
10. Zemanová B., Hájková P., Hájek B., Martínková N., Mikulíček P., Zima J., Bryja J. Extremely low genetic variation in endangered Tatra chamois and evidence for hybridization with an introduced Alpine population. Conserv Genet.2015;(16):729–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-015-0696-2
11. Allendorf F.W., Leary R.F., Hitt N.P., Knudsen K.L., Lundquist L.L., Spruell. P. Intercrosses and the U.S. Endangered Species Act: should hybridized populations be included as westslope cutthroat trout. Conservation Biology. 2004;(18):1203–1213.
12. Wolf D.E., Takebayashi N., Rieseberg L.H. Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conservation Biology. 2001;(15):1039– 1053.
13. [NasibovSh.N. Genetic and biological aspects of hybridization of agricultural and wild animal species: author. dis. ... Dr. Biol. sciences. Dubrovitsy, 2010. 24 p. (In Russ.)
14. Misharev S.S. Breeding a new breed of goats by crossing the Caucasian Tour with domestic goats: VNIIOK report for 1961.Stavropol. 1961;(1):443-450. (In Russ.)
15. Nasibov Sh.N., Bagirov V.A., Klenovitsky P.M., Iolchiev B.S., Zinovieva N.A., Voevodin V.A., Amirshoev F.S. The genetic potential of wild fauna in the creation of new breeding forms of animals. Achievements of science and technology of the agricultural sector.2010;(8):59-62. (InRuss.)
16. Aybazov, M.M. The use of laparoscopy for intrauterine insemination and transplantation of embryos in sheep. Bulletin of Veterinary Medicine.1998;(5):51. (InRuss.)
17. Aybazov M.M. Modern biotechnological methods and techniques for intensifying the reproduction of sheep and goats. Sheep, goats, woolen work.2007;(4):54-56.(InRuss.)
18. Bagirov V.A., KlenovitskyP.M., Nasibov Sh.N., IolchievB.S., ZinovievaN.A., ErnstL.K., GusevI.V., KononovV.P. Rat ionaluseofgeneticresourcesandhybridizationingoatbreeding. Agric ulturalbiology.2009;(6):27-33.(InRuss.)
19. Aybazov, A.M., Mamontova T.V. Some biological and morphometric indicators of the West Caucasian tour. Sheep, goats, woolen work.2014;(1):21-23.(InRuss.)
20. Brehm A.E. Brehmsthierleben, allgemeinekunde-desthierreichs. Verlag des Bibliographischeninstitu ts.1883;(3):275.
21. Proceedings of the London Zoological Society. 1869. P.134-135.
22. Valchev K., Andonov K., Popgeorgiev G., Plachijski D., Avramov S. Action plan for the Chamois in Bulgaria: 2007–2016. BBF-SFA, Sofia. 2006.
23. Markov G., Zhelev P., Ben Slimen H., Suchentrunk F. Population genetic data pertinent to the conservation of Bulgarian chamois (Rupicaprarupicaprabalcanica). Conservation Genetics.2016;(17):155-164.
24. Šprem N., Buzan E. The genetic impact of chamois management in the Dinarides. Journal of Wildlife Management. 2016;(80):783-793.
25. Damm G.R., Franco N. CIC Caprinae Atlas of the World. CIC International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation, Budakeszi, Hungary, in cooperation with Rowland Ward Publications, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2014.
26. Crestanello B., Pecchioli E., Vernesi C., Mona C., Martínková N., Janiga M. The genetic impact of translocations and habitat fragmentation in chamois (Rupicapraspp). Journal of Heredity. 2009;(100):691-708.
27. Roucher F. The fate of the Chartreuse chamois. Newsletter of the IUCN. SSC Caprinae Specialist Group January: 4– 5. 1999.
28. Alasaad S., Fickel J., Rossi L., Sarasa M., Benitez C.V., Granados J.E. Applicability of major histocompatibility complex DRB1 alleles as markers to detect vertebrate hybridization: a case study from Iberian ibex x domestic goat in Southern Spain. ActaVeterinariaScandinavica. 2012;(54):56.
29. Sarasa M., Alasaad S., Pérez J.M. Common names of species, the curious case of Capra pyrenaica and the concomitant steps towards the ‘wild-to-domestic’ transformation of a flagship species and its vernacular names. Biodiversity Conservation. 2012;(21):1-12
30. Giacometti M., Roganti R., De Tann D., Stahlberger‐ Saitbekova N., Obexer‐Ruff G. Alpine ibex Capra ibex ibex x domestic goat C. aegagrusdomestica hybrids in a restricted area of southern Switzerland. Wildlife Biology.2004;(10):137–143.
31. St‐we M., Nievergelt B. Recovery of Alpine ibex from near extinction: the result of effective protection, captive breeding, and reintroductions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science.1991;(29):379–387.
32. Grossen C., Keller L., Biebach I., The International Goat Genome Consortium, Croll D. Introgression from domestic goat generated variation at the major histocompatibility complex of Alpine ibex. PLoS Genetics.2014;(10):e1004438.
33. Randi E., Tosi G., Toso S., Lorenzini R., Fusco G. Genetic variability and conservation problems in Alpine ibex, domestic and feral goat populations (genus Capra). ZeitschriftfürSäugetierkun de.1990;(55):413-420.
34. Turček F.J., Hickey J.J. Effect of introductions on two game populations in Czechoslovakia. Journal of Wildlife Management.1951;(15):113–114.
35. Sarasa M., Alasaad S., Pérez J.M. Common names of species, the curious case of Capra pyrenaica and the concomitant steps towards the ‘wild‐to‐domestic’ transformation of a flagship species and its vernacular names. Biodiversity Conservation.2012;(21):1–12.
36. Herrero J., Fernández‐Arberas O., Prada C., García‐Serrano A., García‐González R. An escaped herd of Iberian wild goat (Capra pyrenaica, Schinz 1838, Bovidae) begins the recolonization of the Pyrenees. Mammalia. 2013;(77):403– 407.
37. Fernández‐Arias A., Alabart J.L., Folch J., Beckers J.F. Interspecies pregnancy of Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) fetus in domestic goat (Capra hircus) recipients induces abnormally high plasmatic levels of pregnancy‐associated glycoprotein. Theriogenology. 1999;(51):1419–1430.
38. Giannatos G., Herrero J., Lovari S. Capra hircus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: e.T136383A4283792.2007.
39. Masseti M. The wild goats Capra aegagrusErxleben, 1777 of the Mediterranean Sea and the Eastern Atlantic Ocean islands. Mammal Review.2009;(39):141–157.
40. Papaioannou H. Ungulates and their management in Greece. In: M Apollonio, R Andersen, R Putman (eds) European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 2010. P.540-562.
41. Selionova M.I., Bagirov V.A. About some results of scientific support of sheep and goat breeding of the Russian Federation. Sheep, goats, wool.2014;(1):2-4. (In Russ.)
42. BagirovV.A., NasibovSh.N., KlenovitskyP.M. etal. Conservation and rational use of the animal gene pool. Doc. RAAS.2009;(2):37-40. (In Russ.)
43. Lopyrin A.I. Biology of sheep breeding. M .:Kolos, 1971.320 p. (In Russ.)
44. Shaidullin I.N. Biological features of sheep acclimatization and their hybridization with Ovisnivicola snow sheep in the conditions of Kamchatka: author. dis. ... Dr. Biol. sciences. Dubrovitsy, 1994. 42 p. (In Russ.)
45. Iolchiev B.S., Klenovitsky P.M., Bagirov V.A., Shaydullin I.N., Zhilinsky M.A., Sheraliev F.D. Reproductive development of hybrid goats. Achievements of science and technology of the agricultural sector. 2018;32(6):64-66. DOI:10.24411/0235-2451-2018-10615. (In Russ.)
46. Aybazov A.-M.M., Mamontova T.V. Some productive and biological indicators of the offspring obtained from the crosses of the West Caucasian tour and Karachai goats. Collection of scientific papers of the Stavropol Research Institute of Animal Husbandry and Feed Production.2014;1(7):50-55. (In Russ.)
47. Corlatti L., Lorenzini R., Lovari S. The conservation of the chamois Rupicapra spp. Mammal Review. 2011;(41):163–174.
48. Iacolina L., Corlatti L., Buzan E., Safner T., Šprem N. Hybridisation in European ungulates: an overview of the current status, causes, and consequences. 2019;49(1):45-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12140
Review
For citations:
Prytkov Yu.A., Iolchiev B.S., Volkova N.A. Aspects of using interspecific hybridization of goats. Agrarian science. 2020;(7-8):35-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-340-7-35-38
Views:
600
Email this article 