Тhe quality of potatoes affects consumer properties of processed foods
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-351-7-8-99-103
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that with an increased level of mineral nutrition (N120P180K240) all varieties increased the yield (by 1.7–4.1 tons/ha, or by 10–25%), while the most productive varieties being Bryansky Nadezhny, Bryanskaya Novinka, Slava Bryanshchiny (21.9–22.9 tons/ha). In terms of dry substances content almost all varieties met the requirements of processing, which called for for a dry substance level in tubers of at least 20–24%. With an increase in the dose of fertilizers the amount of starch and dry matter in tubers decreased. On an average background, the starch content compared to the control decreased by 0.7–1.1%, dry substances — by 0.7– 1.2%, on an increased background respectively — by 1.2–1.7%, dry substances — by 1.4–2.7%. The taste of potatoes on an increased background of fertilizers worsened regardless of variety. In terms of darkening of the flesh, raw cleaned tubers of all varieties are not suitable for long-term storage (for example, for 24 hours), while boiled tubers of all varieties did not reduce the quality. Growing potatoes on an increased background of mineral nutrition increased the darkening of raw tubers of the studied varieties compared to control. In the studied varieties the content of reducing sugars in many cases exceeded the amount allowed for the manufacture of crispy potatoes, and therefore its quality was reduced, mainly due to the color of the slices. Almost all varieties gave puree of good quality. An increase in the background of fertilizers slightly worsened the consistency of puree, which reduced the overall estimate.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. MolyavkoRussian Federation
140051, Kraskovo-1, Lorha st., 23
A. V. Marukhlenko
Russian Federation
140051, Kraskovo-1, Lorha st., 23
N. P. Borisova
Russian Federation
140051, Kraskovo-1, Lorha st., 23
References
1. Belous N.M. Vliyanie udobreniy na urozhaiynost i kulinarnie kachestva kartofelya // Agrokhimiya. N 10. 1995. S. 55-61.
2. Korshunov A.V., Filippova H.I., Pshechenkov K.A., Sidyakina I.I., Simakov E.A., Starovoiytov V.I. Kachestvo kartofelya i kartofeleproduktov. M.: VNIIKH. 2001. 253 s.
3. Simakov E.A., Anisimov B.V., Starovoiytov V.I. i dr. Pererabotka kartofelya – stratehichkiy put razvitiya kartofelevodstva Rosii. M. 2006. S.5.
4. Shanina E.P., Sergeeva L.B. Ocenka sortov kartofelya na prihodnost dlya proiznodstva polufabrikata fri / Sb. Kartofelevodstvo. Materiali nuch.- prakt. i koord. soveschaniya «Sovremnie tend. i persp. razvit. selekzii i semenovodstva kartofelya». M. 2011. S. 163-170.
5. Malcev S.V., Pshechenkov K.A.Biokhimichesrie pokazateli klubneiy i kachestvo kartofeleproduktov v zavisimosti ot usloviy viraschivaniya i tekhnologii khraneniya / Sb. Kartofelevodstvo. Tom 2. Materiali nuch.- prakt. i koord. soveschaniy «Nauchnoe obespech. i innovac. razvitie kartofelevodstva». M. 2008. S. 236- 242.
6. Vlasyuk P.A., Micko V.N. Fizioloho-biokhimicheskaya priroda potemneniya myakoti klubneiy kartofelya / V kn. Fiziologiya i biokhimiya kulturnikh rasteniy. Vip 1. Tom 4. Kiev. 1972. S.3.
7. Muller K. Chemisck und Physiologick bedingte Ursachen vor Blauflechigkeit Rohbreiverfarbung und kochdunkelung der Kartoffel // Kartoffelbau. 1979. B. 30. N 11. S. 404.
8. Anisimov B.V. Spezialnie zoni semenovodstva kartofelya // Kartofel i ovoschi. N 4. 2015. S. 30-33.
9. Sedova V.I., Pshechenkov K.A., Sazonova Z.V., Malcev S.V. Ozenka sortov kartofelya selekcii NNIIKH na prihodnost k pererabotke na obzharennie kartofeleprodukti i kartofelnoe pyure / Sb. Kartofelevodstvo. Tom 1. Materiali nuch.- prakt. i koord. soveschaniy «Nauchnoe obespech. i innovac. razvitie kartofelevodstva». M. 2008. S. 247-253.
10. Zeiyruk V.N., Pshechenkov K.A., Davidenkova O.N., Malcev S.V. Kachestvo svezheho stolovoho kartofelya i kartofeleproduktov v zavisimosti ot usloviy viraschivaniya i khraneniya v centralnom rehione Rossii / Materiali mezhdunarodnoho kongressa «Kartofel. Rossiya - 2007». Sb. Kartofelevodstvo. Rossiya: atualnie problemi nauki i praktiki. FHNU «Rosinformagrotekh». 2007. S. 175-179.
11. Fedotova L.S., Kravchenko A.V., Timoshina N.A., Podboronov A.V. Perspektivnie napravleniya agrotekhnicheskikh issledovaniy pri vozdelivanii kartofelya v usloviyakh centralnoho rehiona Rossii / Sb. Kartofelevodstvo. Mater. nuch. konf. «Mirivie geneticheskie resursi kartofelya i ikh ispolz. v sovr. napravleniyakh selekcii» (k 125 – letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya N.I. Vavilova). М.: Rosselkhozakademiya, VNIIKH. 2012. C. 213-217.
12. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po ocenke sortov kartofelya na prihodnost k promishlennoiy pererabotke / V.P. Kiryukhin, M.M. Cheholina. М.: NIIKH. 1983. 56 s.
13. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevoho opita (s osnovami statisticheskoiy obrabotki rezultatov issledovaniy). 5 – e izd. dop. i perer. M.: Ahropromizdat. 1985. 351 s.
Review
For citations:
Molyavko A.A., Marukhlenko A.V., Borisova N.P. Тhe quality of potatoes affects consumer properties of processed foods. Agrarian science. 2021;(7-8):99-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-351-7-8-99-103