Diseases of roses of the tea-hybrid garden group of the collection of the Stavropol Botanical Garden
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-359-5-105-108
Abstract
Relevance. Conducting research on the resistance of hybrid tea roses to phytopathogenic harmful organisms and determining the species composition of pathogens and factors affecting their developmen.
Methods. The objects of the study were the causative agents of fungal diseases of varieties of hybrid tea roses from the collection of the Stavropol Botanical Garden. The research was carried out using the Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops.
Results. The results of studying the species composition of mycosis pathogens on varieties of roses of the tea-hybrid garden group of the collection of the Stavropol Botanical Garden are presented. The nature and degree of damage to plants is described, the causes are established and methods of containment of diseases are developed. The most harmful and common diseases on hybrid tea roses in growing conditions are: powdery mildew (Podosphaera pannosa Lew. var. rosae Voron.); downy mildew (Peronoplasmopara sparsa (Berk.) Uljan.); rust (is caused by 2 pathogens — Phragmidium mucronatum (Pers.) Schltdl., Phragmidium tuberculatum Mϋll. Hal.); gray rot (Botrytis cinerea Pers.) and leaf spotting of different types: black spot (Diplocarpon rosae F.A. Wolf. = Marssonina rosae (Lib.) Diet.); septoria (Septoria rosae Desm.); cercosporiasis (Cercospora rosiola Pass.), the development of which was facilitated by meteorological conditions over the years of research. Evaluation of hybrid tea cultivaris of roses for resistance to fungal diseases was carried out in 2019-2021 in the collection of the Stavropol botanical garden on a natural infectious background on a 5-point scale during the period of mass spread of diseases. Despite the fact that all cultivaris of hybrid tea roses are affected by fungal diseases, it has been found that different cultivaris are affected differently. According to the degree of resistance to the complex of diseases, 4 cultivaris received 1 point (practically resistant), 52 cultivaris received 2 points (weakly affected), 74 cultivaris received 3 points (mediumly affected), 33 cultivaris received 4 points (strongly affected). Regular monitoring of the phytosanitary state of the studied cultivaris, biological and chemical protection measures made it possible to reduce the massive spread of fungal diseases and preserve the decorative effect of plants.
About the Author
S. A. Bardakova
FSBSI “North-Caucasus Federal Agrarian Research
Center”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bardakova Svetlana Anatolyevna, Senior Researcher of the
Laboratory of Dendrology of the Stavropol Botanical Garden
named after V.V. Skripchinsky
355029, Stavropol, Lenin st., 478
References
1. Misko L. A.//Diseases and protective measures. Moscow: Iz-vo Nauka, 1986. 248.р (in Russ.).
2. Klimenko Z. K., Plugatar S. A., Kravchenko I. N., et al. Guidelines for the cultivation of garden roses (Rosa L) in the conditions of the southern coast of Crimea. – Simferopol: IT «ARIAL», 2019. Р. 22-23. (in Russ.).
3. Plugatar S. A., Klimenko Z. K., Plugatar Y.V., Mitrofanova I. V. Garden roses: results of introduction and selection in Nikita botanical garden // Proceedings of the I International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Ornamentals – Thailand, 2017. – Asta Horticulturae 1167 – P. 177-179.
4. Plugatar S. A. Resistance of hybrid tea roses to diseases and pests. Hybrid tea roses: biological characteristics, variety assessment, use in landscaping in the South of Russia. Simferopol: «Polyprint», 2019, Р. 107-110. (in Russ.).
5. Zvonareva L. N, Klimenko Z. K, Kravchenko I. N. Phytosanitary assessment of rose varieties of miniature garden group of the Nikitsky botanical garden collection // Plant biology and horticulture: theory, innovation, 2019. No. 1 (150). Р. 85-90. (in Russ.). DOI 10.36305/2019-1-150-85-92
6. Methodology of the State variety testing of agricultural crops. - Moscow: Kolos Publishing House, 1968. - Issue. 6: Ornamental crops. 224 p. (in Russ.).
7. Semina S. N., Klimenko V. N., Klimenko Z. K. Assessment of the gene pool of garden roses for resistance to powdery mildew // Bul. NBS. Issue 2 (30), 1976. Р. 48-54. (in Russ.).
8. Balykina E. B., Klimenko Z. K., Zvonareva L. N. et al. Pests and diseases of garden roses from the collection of Nikitsky botanical garden // Bulletin of TvSU. Series: Biology and Ecology, 2017. No. 4. P. 92-100. (in Russ.).
9. Bardakova S. A. The influence of unfavorable climatic conditions on the growth and development of garden roses in the Stavropol botanical garden. Bulletin of the APK of Stavropol, 2017. No. 1 (25) P. 120-122. (in Russ.).
10. Zvonareva L. N. Powdery mildew of garden roses and measures to combat it in the Nikitsky botanical garden // Collection of scientific works of GNBS. - Yalta, 2017.Vol. 145. P. 258-262. (in Russ.).
11. Koltsov A. F., Bardakova S. A. Types of rosehip (Rosa L.) in the Stavropol botanical garden. Bulletin of the APK of Stavropol, 2019. No. 2 (34) P. 62-64. (in Russ.). DOI:10.31279/2222-9345- 2019-8-34-62-64
12. Sokolov N. I. Roses. M: VO “Agropromizdat,” 1991. Р. 130- 133. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bardakova S.A. Diseases of roses of the tea-hybrid garden group of the collection of the Stavropol Botanical Garden. Agrarian science. 2022;(5):105-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-359-5-105-108
Views:
416
Email this article 