Organization of sustainable management of meadows in the Nonchernozem belt of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-362-9-120-125
Abstract
Relevance and methodology. Meadow communities forming in various ecological regimes, participate in the biogeochemical carbon cycle, accumulating and retaining it, removing it from the atmospheric air. A significant part of the natural meadows in the old-developed region is intensively exploited and loses carbondepositing functions. The sustainable management of meadows under intensive exploitation provides for the organization of their restoration and optimal exploitation. In field and office work, the method of trial plots, ecological analytical methods with the determination of organic carbon in the composition of soil humus, the method of phytocenotic analogs, the weight method, and a number of statistical methods were used.
Results. The research of the dynamics of the carbon content of above- and underground biomass, soil of three meadows types, showed a favourable effect of restoration processes on the organic carbon content of soils, the growth of biomass and productivity. The long-flooded meadows turned out to be the most responsive to restoration processes. However, the increase in the amount of aboveground and underground biomass in meadows, the productivity of meadows also increased for all types of meadows by the age of 5 years, and then decreased. The following monitoring indicators to diagnose the progress of recovery processes in meadow ecosystems are recommended: root biomass, leaf area index and content of labile organic matter. Therefore, when planning the management of meadows during restoration successions, it is necessary to provide for a moderate pasture load with 4–5 years of restoration processes. Planning the use of meadows, it is necessary to provide for a combination of sequestration and deposit processes of organic carbon, which is a way to increase or preserve the humus content of soils, preserve crop yields, and reduce CO2 emissions into the atmospheric air.
About the Authors
L. N. AnishchenkoRussian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Department of Geography, Ecology and Land Management
st. Bezhitskaya 14a, Bryansk
S. N. Potsepai
Russian Federation
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor of the Institute of Economics and Agribusiness
Bryansk State Agrarian University,
st. Sovetskaya 2a, s. Kokino, Vygonichy district, Bryansk region
A. A. Spravtsev
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science and Ecology,
st. Sovetskaya 2a, s. Kokino, Vygonichy district, Bryansk region
T. I. Vakina
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Department of Agronomy, Breeding and Seed Production,
st. Sovetskaya 2a, s. Kokino, Vygonichy district, Bryansk region
M. V. Semyshev
Russian Federation
Associate Professor at the Institute of Economics and Agribusiness,
st. Sovetskaya 2a, s. Kokino, Vygonichy district, Bryansk region
S. M. Sychev
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Department of Agronomy, Breeding and Seed Production,
st. Sovetskaya 2a, s. Kokino, Vygonichy district, Bryansk region
References
1. Chang J., Ciais, P., Gasser T. et al. Climate warming from managed grasslands cancels the cooling effect of carbon sinks in sparsely grazed and natural grasslands. Nat Commun. 12. 118. 2021. [Electronic resource] .https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20406-7.
2. Lal R. Soil organic matter content and crop yield. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2020. 75 (2). Рр.27A-32A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.2.27A/.
3. Stolbovoi V. Carbon in Russian soils. Climat.Change. 2022. 55. 131- 156.
4. Nicoloso R.S., Rice, C.W., Amado T.J.C., Costa C.N., Akley E.K., Carbon saturation and translocation in a no-till soil under organic amendments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2018. 264. 73–84.
5. Klumpp K. et. al. The carbon sequestration of grassland soils – climate change and mitigation strategies. 2018. 23. 509-519.
6. Schjonning P., Jensen J.L., Bruun S. Jensen L., Christensen B., Munkholm L., Oelofse M., Baby S., Knudsen L. The role of soil organic matter for maintaining crop yields: Evidence for a renewed conceptual basis. Advances in Agronomy. 2018. 150. 35–79.
7. Belous N.M., Shapovalov V.F., Simonenko N.K., Smolsky E.V. Influence of fertilizers on the productivity and accumulation of radionuclides in the cultivation of bluegrass grasses in single-species crops. Argochemical Bulletin. 2012. 5. 6-8. (In Russian)
8. Oldfield E., Bradford M., Wood S. Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields. Soil. 2019. 5. 15–32.
9. Shapovalov V.F., Kharkevich L.P., Belous I.N. Productivity and quality of green mass, perennial grasses depending on the conditions of mineral nutrition and methods of tillage. Agrochemical Bulletin. 2011. 3. 6-8. (In Russian)
10. Kogut M.B., Semenov V.M. Assessment of soil saturation with organic carbon. Bull. Soil Institute named after V.V. Dokuchaev. 2020. 102. 103- 124. (In Russian)
11. International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature: 3rd ed. H.E. Weber, J. Moravec, J.-P. Teriya. Vegetation of Russia. 2005. 7. 3–38. (In Russian)
12. Guidelines for the Classification of Hayfields and Pastures in the Plain Territory of the European Part of the USSR. M.: VNII forage, 1987. 148 . (In Russian)
13. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensociologie: 3. Aufl. Wien; New York, 1964. 865 .
14. Methods for determining active components in the composition of soil humus (For comparative studies in long-term experiments, reference plots and polygons of agroecological monitoring). M.: VNIIA, 2010. 34 . (In Russian)
15. Zaitsev G.N. Mathematics in experimental botany. M.: Nauka, 1990. 296 . (In Russian)
16. Egorova V.N. Floodplain meadows of the Middle Oka: monitoring, problems of conservation and restoration of biodiversity and gene pool. M.: European polygraphic systems, 2013. 412 . (In Russian)
17. Potsepay S.N., Belchenko S.A., Anishchenko L.N., Productivity and ecological and chemical characteristics of sown meadows of the Desenye in background conditions (Bryansk region). Bulletin of the Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2019. 1. 39-44. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Anishchenko L.N., Potsepai S.N., Spravtsev A.A., Vakina T.I., Semyshev M.V., Sychev S.M. Organization of sustainable management of meadows in the Nonchernozem belt of the Russian Federation. Agrarian science. 2022;(9):120-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-362-9-120-125