Problems of farm animals’ ecological keeping in cities
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-365-12-35-40
Abstract
Relevance. On the areas of many cities and suburbs farm animals, which include pigs, quails, sheep, and even cows, are kept. Despite environmental complexity of this problem, it can be successfully solved, otherwise it will become a challenge for modern consumer society. The main ecology problem of the urban environment at farm animals keeping in cities is their biowaste and qustions of its disposal and processing.
Methods. The method of this study is scientific analysis of literary data, GOST standards, SNIPS, technical regulations and own research and observations in the conditions of existing enterprises for the maintenance of animals in the urban environment.
Results. According to Rosstat, in 2020 in Moscow 1,3 thousand tons of livestock and poultry of all kinds were raised, including 0,5 thousand tons of cattle; 0,013 thousand tons of pigs; 0,8 thousand tons of sheep and goats; 0,015 thousand tons of poultry. In 2021, sheep and goats production here increased by 20,3 %. For comparison, in Sevastopol, “only” 0,7 thousand tons of livestock and poultry of all kinds were raised, including 0,313 thousand tons of cattle; 0,251 thousand tons of pigs; 0,1 thousand tons of sheep and goats; 0,1 thousand tons of poultry of all kinds. Houses and enterprises built according to “green” environmental standards and new technologies reduce the thermal (carbon) footprint generated by keeping animals in the cities with coatings and building materials’ help. At present there are other technologies with high environmental friendliness, such as ergonomic air ventilation and heating’s systems. The biowaste’s recycling, composting, incineration, burying practice, as well as investments made in the cities urban environment ecology industry bear fruits, and this sector is now developing by 3,5 times faster than other agricultural sectors.
About the Author
V. Yu. SidorovaRussian Federation
Victoria Yu. Sidorova, doctor of agricultural sciences, general research worker
laboratory of beef production innovative equipment and promising technologies’ development
Ryazanovskoye
Moscow
References
1. Golovan V. T. Recipes for longevity of cows. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 2017. 1; 139–147. (In Russian)
2. Ogden Meghan. «The Anthropocene» viewed from Vernadsky’s Noosphere. LaRouche Action Center, February 29, 2016. 12–18 р.
3. Mamin R.G. Innovative waste management mechanisms: M.: MGSU, 2018, 530 p. (In Russian)
4. Melnikova E. E. Breeding index of breeding value of cows of the population of black-and-white cattle of the Moscow region. Scientific journal “Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (TAA)”. 2017. 1; p. 85–97. (In Russian)
5. Mochalova L. A., Grinenko D. A., Yurak V. V. Solid municipal waste management system: foreign and domestic experience. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 2017 Issue 3 (47). pp. 97–101. DOI: 10.21440/2307-2091-2017-3-97-101. (In Russian)
6. David Pitt, Paul R. Samson, Mikhail S. Gorbachev. The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader: Global Environment, Society and Change. Routledge, 2012. 223 p.
7. Hashegulgov Sh. B. The influence of environmental factors on the adaptive qualities of cows. Bulletin Altai State Agrarian University. 2017. 2 (148). P. 87–92. (In Russian)
8. Drugov Yu. S. Analysis of contaminated soil and hazardous waste: monogr. M.: Binom. Laboratory of knowledge, 2019. 472 p. (In Russian)
9. Petrenko E. N. Problems of occurrence of technogenic deposits and an innovative method of their solution. Collection of tr. of the seventh International Ecological Congress (ninth scientific and technical International Conference) “Ecology and safety of life of industrial transport Elpit-2019 complexes”, September 25–28, 2019, Samara, Tolyatti. p. 93–97. (In Russian)
10. Bykov D. E., Chertes K. L., Tupitsyna O. V., Shcherbina E. V., Savelyev A. A. Ensuring geoecological stability of municipal waste arrays for their construction and economic development. Ecology and industry of Russia. 2016 20 (8); 4–11. (In Russian)
11. Ponomarev M. V. Commentary on the Federal Law “On Production and Consumption waste” M.: Delovoy dvor, 2019: 232 p. (In Russian)
12. Pystin V. N. Waste disposal and elimination of objects of accumulation of harm in conditions of specially protected natural territory Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2022. 26. ( 5). 22–26 (In Russian)
13. Chertes K. L. Geoengineering protection of territories violated by objects of accumulated environmental damage. Ecology and industry of Russia. 2020. 24 (4); 10–15. (In Russian)
14. Ivanov Yu. A., Mironov V. V. Ecological animal husbandry: problems and challenges. Technologies and technical means of mechanized production of crop and livestock products, 2015. 87. pp. 35–48. (In Russian)
15. Chertes K. L. Innovative approaches in solving modern problems of rational use of natural resources and environmental protection. Сollection of dokl. International. sci.-tech. conf., Alushta, June 3–7., 2019 Belgorod:Publishing House of BSTU, 2019. V. 2. p. 149–154. (In Russian)
16. Chertes K. L. Three-dimensional digital modeling in the technologies of sanitation of the geomedia contaminated with hydrocarbons, as a basis for the management of technogenic systems. Problems of management and modeling in complex systems: Proceedings of the XXI International Conference 3–6 September 2019, Samara): in 2 volumes. Samara: LLC “Etching”. 2019. 1; pp. 532–535. (In Russian)
17. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 84-r dated January 25, 2018 “On Approval of the Industrial Development Strategy for Processing, Recycling and Neutralization of Production and Consumption Waste for the period up to 2030” (In Russian)
18. Regulations on waste management in the metropolitan region and the municipality of Kirkkonummi. Helsinki Region Environmental Service (HSY) https://julkaisu.hsy.fi/paakaupunkiseudun-ja-kirkkonummen-jatehuoltomaaraykset-01112022.pdf (Date of request.) (Acces sed HSY, May 22, 2020) (in Finnish)
19. Rybak V. A. Scientific and methodological foundations and software automation tools for evaluation and analysis of parameters of promising eco-safe technologies Minsk: Riga, 2017. 263 p. (In Russian)
20. Sidorova V. Yu. Practical use of models with variable parameters for planning the ecological maintenance of dairy cattle. Eurasian Union of Scientists (EUU), 2017. 6 (39), (1), p. 39–40. (In Russian)
21. Buffon J. Epochen der Natur, Bd. 2. St.-Petersburg, 2001. V. 1778, S. 173 Clive Hamilton, Jacques Grinevald. Was the Anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Review, 2015. 1–14 рр.
22. Shilkina S.V. Global trends in waste management and analysis of the situation in Russia. Waste and Resources, 2020. 2. (7). pp.5–6. (In Russian)
23. Sidorova V. Yu. Digital model of ecological maintenance of beef cattle. Materials of the 6th conference “Math. modeling in ecology” EcoMatMod-2019, Pushchino, Russia, p. 187–189. (In Russian)
24. Wilson A. Biosphere, Noosphere, Infosphere: Epistemo-Aesthetics and The Age Of Big Data. Journal Parallax, Volume 23, 2017 – Issue 2: Nootechnics, Guest Edited by Anaïs Nony, 202–219 р.
25. Gasanov M. A., Kolotov K. A., Demidenko K. A., Podgornaya E. A., Kadnikova O. V. The Concept of Ecologically Oriented Progress and Natural Resource Preservation Ecology and safety in the technosphere: current problems and solutions, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 50, 2017. 22–74 р.
Review
For citations:
Sidorova V.Yu. Problems of farm animals’ ecological keeping in cities. Agrarian science. 2022;(12):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-365-12-35-40