Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

The prospect of using chicken breeds of the combined type of productivity in organic poultry farming

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-365-12-51-56

Abstract

   Relevance. The demand for organic meat products is constantly increasing. Organic agriculture is the leading global trend. The organic market for 2020 is estimated at $ 130 billion with an annual growth of 13–15 %. During the pandemic, sales of organic products in developed countries increased by 30–40 %.
   Methods. The object of the study were chickens of the Pushkin breed and the Ross 308 cross (broiler). The birds were grown up to 85 days of age under the same conditions, the stocking density was 10 birds/m2. At the age of slaughter in industrial production (48 days – broiler) and organic production (85 days) according to the methodology of the All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry (2001), anatomical cutting of 9 heads was carried out. Analysis of quality indicators of meat by high performance liquid chromatography (M02-902-142-07) was carried out in the certified laboratory «Leningradskaya MVL». Dry matter was determined by the express method according to the Rygalova E. A. and the water binding capacity of meat was determined by the Grau – Hamm method in the Volovinskaya – Kelman modification.
   Results. Extending the fattening period of broilers to 85 days to meet the requirements of organic poultry farming does not sufficiently improve the quality of their meat. Low livestock safety (58.16 %) reduces the profitability of organic broiler production. An increase in the total protein content from 20.44 % to 24.41 % and amino acids (tryptophan and prolin), as well as a decrease in fat content from 5.1% to 1.35 % in the pec-toral muscle of broiler chickens from 45th to 85th day improves the dietary qualities of broiler meat. However, a decrease from 51.46 % to 48.54 % of the water-binding capacity of meat reduces its taste and techno-logical qualities. In chicken of the Pushkin breed this figure is 51.35 %. Thus, using the example of the Pushkin breed of chickens, it is shown that breeds of the combined direction of productivity are more suitable for long-term cultivation in organic poultry farming for obtaining meat products.

About the Authors

Z. L. Fedorova
All-Russian Research Institute of Genetics and Breeding of Farm Animals – a branch of the Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L. K. Ernst
Russian Federation

Zoya L. Fedorova, Ph.D. Agricultural

196626

55 A, Moscow highway

St. Petersburg

Pushkin



A. B. Vakhrameev
All-Russian Research Institute of Genetics and Breeding of Farm Animals – a branch of the Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L. K. Ernst
Russian Federation

Anatoly B. Vakhrameev, Senior research Scientist

Department of Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Gene Pool Preservation

196626

55 A, Moscow highway

St. Petersburg

Pushkin



A. V. Makarova
All-Russian Research Institute of Genetics and Breeding of Farm Animals – a branch of the Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member L. K. Ernst
Russian Federation

Alexandra V. Makarova, Ph.D. (Agricultural),  Research Scientist

Department of Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Gene pool Preservation

196626

55 A, Moscow highway

St. Petersburg

Pushkin



References

1. Rosstat. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13277 [Accessed July 18, 2022] (In Russian)

2. Andreev, V. V. The fat content in the edible parts of the carcasses of broiler chickens that received marcinbel as part of the diet. Molodoj uchenyj. 2013; 3 (50): 533-534. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/50/6310/ [Accessed July 15, 2022] (In Russian)

3. Vodennikov O. G. To question the quality of meat and its impact on food security and quality of life. Bulletin of the Prikamsky Social Institute. 2 (83), 2019, 36–40 (In Russian)

4. Konovalenko L. Yu., Mishurov N. P., Gridnev P. I., Korshunov S. A., Lyubovedskaya A. A. Organic animal husbandry: experience and prospects of development: analyte. review. M.: FGBNU «Rosinformagrotekh». 2021. 88 p. (In Russian)

5. Fedorova Z. L. Prospects of organic poultry farming in the Leningrad region. Issues of legal regulation in veterinary medicine. 2018; 3: 158–163 (In Russian)

6. Lukashenko V. S., Lysenko M. A.,Stollyar T. A., Kavtarashvili A. Sh., Lukashenko O. A., Dychakovskaya V. V., Kalashnikov A. I. Methodological recommendations for anatomical cutting of carcasses and organoleptic assessment of the quality of meat and eggs of poultry, and egg morphology. Sergiev Posad. 2001. 27 p. (In Russian)

7. Fisinin V. I. a. th. Assessment of the quality of feed, organs, tissues, eggs and poultry meat. Sergiev posad. 2002. 114p. (In Russian)

8. Tickle P. G., Paxton H., Rankin J. W., Hutchinson J. R., Codd J. R. Anatomical and biomechanical traits of broiler chickens across ontogeny. Part I. Anatomy of the musculoskeletal respiratory apparatus and changes in organ size. Peer J. 2014;2: 432. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.432 URL: https://clck.ru/sNcqA

9. 9 Makarova A. V. Vakhrameev A. B. Fedorova Z. L. Formation of interior features in ontogenesis in chickens of gene pool populations. Poultry and poultry products. 2022; 2: 20–23 (In Russian)

10. Golubev D. S. Bone marrow myelopoiesis in broiler chickens immunized orally against Newcastle disease using the potassium orotate immunostimulator. Veterinary medicine in the XXI century: the role of biotechnologies and digital technologies. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of students, undergraduates and young scientists. Vitebsk. 2021. 21–23. (In Russian)

11. Donskova L. A., Zueva O. N., Belyaev N. M. Poultry meat as a product of organic production: status, problems and management solutions. Basic research. 2018; 1: 64–70. URL: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=42050 [Accessed July 21, 2022] (In Russian)

12. Gorbatov A. V., Gorbatova O. A. Development of the organic products market as a new driver for the production and export of APK. Poultry and poultry products. 2019; 2: 18–21 (In Russian)

13. Heena Jalal, Mir Salahuddin, S. Wani, Hassan Sofi Mohammad Ashraf Pal, Feroz Rather Development of Low Fat Meat Products. International Journal of Food Safety Nutrition and Public Health. 2013; 4 (3): 98–107. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271208161_Development_of_Low_Fat_Meat_Products [Accessed July 22, 2022].

14. Vostrikova N. L., Lisicyn A. B., Chernuha I. M., Ivankin A. N. The study of the usefulness of proteins in different types of beef muscles. All about meat. 2013; 2: 34–38. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izuchenie-polnotsennosti-belkov-v-raznyh-tipah-myschts-govyadiny [Accessed July 22, 2022] (In Russian)

15. Lysikov Yu. A. Amino acids in human nutrition. Еxperimental and clinical gastroenterology. 2012; 2: 88–105. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aminokisloty-v-pitanii-cheloveka/viewer [Accessed July 22, 2022] (in Russian)

16. Unzhakov A. R., Chernobrovkina N. P., Robonen E. V. The role of L-arginine in animal metabolism (review). Problems of biology of productive animals. 2, 2021, 38–51 DOI: 10.25687/1996-6733.prodanimbiol.2021.2.38-51

17. Danchenko E. O. Content of glycine, alanine and proline in some biological objects. Bulletin VDU. 2012; 2 (68): 29–32. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17670950_90194375.pdf [Accessed July 24, 2022] (in Russian)

18. Zharinov, A. I. Comparative evaluation of the composition and properties of protein preparations used in the technology of meat products. Part 1. Vsyo o myase. 2021; 2, 22–24. DOI: 10.21323/2071-2499-2021-2-22-24 (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Fedorova Z.L., Vakhrameev A.B., Makarova A.V. The prospect of using chicken breeds of the combined type of productivity in organic poultry farming. Agrarian science. 2022;(12):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-365-12-51-56

Views: 275


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X