Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

Analysis of experimental data on the gas composition of air on a livestock farm

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-372-7-116-120

Abstract

The article presents studies on the concentration of harmful gases and the movement of air flows in the livestock room. Due to the fact that hydrogen sulfide is extremely volatile, it is well susceptible to removal by ventilation, because of this, maximum peaks of its concentration can be observed in the exhaust area. For a height of 0.5 m, it was 1.66 mg/m3, for 1.5 m — 1.92 mg/m³, and at a height of 2 m, the concentration reached 1.8 mg/m3. The largest amount of carbon dioxide is localized in the feed passage. This is due to the fact that animals most of the time are located in the direction in his direction, and since cattle are the main source of carbon dioxide, since a larger amount is released during respiration, then the main localization of the gas will be directly in the feed passage. In the area of ventilation, CO2 concentrations are equal to 1054 ppm, and in the area without ventilation — 1178 ppm. The maximum peaks of ammonia localization have been established, most of them are located in the area of the room in which the ventilation system is located. For a height of 0.5 m, it was 45.4 mg/m3, for 1.5 m — 43.6 mg/m3, and at a height of 2 m, the concentration reached 44.4 mg/m3. Ammonia concentrations equal to 27.3 mg/m3, 24.8 mg/m3 and 28.6 mg/m3, respectively, were detected at the aft passage, which is closer to the hood, at heights of 0.5 m, 1.5 m and 2 m. Above the feed table, which is located in the part of the cowshed without ventilation, indicators equal to 41.2 mg/m3, 48.7 mg/m3, 22 mg/m3 were found for a height of 0.5 m, 1.5 m and 2 m, respectively. Studies have shown that the peak values of gases are in the area of the cowshed, in which the ventilation system is located. It also depends on the properties of gases (lighter will reach ventilation faster).

About the Authors

I. M. Dovlatov
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation

Igor Mamedyarevich Dovlatov, Researcher, Candidate of Technical Sciences,

5 1st Institutskiy proezd, Moscow, 109428



S. S. Yurochka
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation

Sergei Sergeevich Yurochka, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Technical Sciences,

5 1st Institutskiy proezd, Moscow, 109428



D. A. Blagov
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation

Dmitry Andreevich Blagov, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Biological Sciences,

5 1st Institutskiy proezd, Moscow, 109428



References

1. Scherbakov P.N., Stepanova K.V., Burkov P.V., Rebezov M.B., Shnyakina T.N., Barzanova E.N. The mechanism of suppression of the synthesis of toxic gases and their indirect influence on the vital signs of the animal organism with adaptive growing technologies. Agrarian science. 2023; (2): 49–53. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-367-2-49-53

2. Kostarev S., Kochetova O., Ivanova A., Sereda T. Project development of a «smart» premise system for pig keeping. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021; 254: 08029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125408029

3. Leliveld L.M.C., Riva E., Mattachini G., Finzi A., Lovarelli D., Provolo G. Dairy Cow Behavior Is Affected by Period, Time of Day and Housing. Animals. 2022; 12(4): 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040512

4. Ivanov Yu.G., Kirsanov V.V., Yurochka S.S. Research of microclimate parameters in the zoo station of the RSAU-MTAA. Doklady TSKhA. Collection of articles. Moscow: Russian State Agrarian University — Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2019; 291(5): 115–118 (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ifyigh

5. Assatbayeva G., Issabekova S., Uskenov R., Karymsakov T., Abdrakhmanov T. Influence of microclimate on ketosis, mastitis and diseases of cow reproductive organs. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology. 2022; 10(3): 2230. http://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.22030

6. Lovarelli D., Riva E., Mattachini G., Guarino M., Provolo G. Assessing the effect of barns structures and environmental conditions in dairy cattle farms monitored in Northern Italy. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2021; 52: 1229. http://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2021.1229

7. Kochetova O.V., Kostarev S.N., Tatarnikova N.A., Sereda T.G. Development of microclimate control system in cattle barns for cattle housing in the Perm region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 839: 032030. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/3/032030

8. Dovlatov I., Yuferev L., Pavkin D. Efficiency Optimization of Indoor Air Disinfection by Radiation Exposure for Poultry Breeding. Vasant P., Zelinka I., Weber G.W. (eds.). Intelligent Computing and Optimization. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Optimization 2019 (ICO 2019). Springer Cham. 2020; 177–189. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-33585-4_18


Review

For citations:


Dovlatov I.M., Yurochka S.S., Blagov D.A. Analysis of experimental data on the gas composition of air on a livestock farm. Agrarian science. 2023;(7):116-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-372-7-116-120

Views: 185


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X