Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography of the heart of a chick embryo in the early period of embryogenesis

Relevance. The chicken embryo model is ideal for studying the development of the heart, which is the first functioning organ in embryogenesis. Particular attention is drawn to the embryonic period, when the embryonic heart is both functioning and forming, and small deviations in this process can lead to developmental anomalies. The current lack of results of accurate measurements of the morphology of the heart of a chicken embryo requires high-quality visualization, the complexity of which is determined by dynamic changes in the morphology of the heart, small size and complex spatial details of the organ. Threedimensional imaging methods are indispensable tools in this aspect, among which X-ray microtomography has special advantages.

Methods. Embryo scanning (4–8 days, embryonic stages HH22–HH34) was performed using a highresolution X-ray microtomograph Skyscan 1176. A 1% solution of phosphoric-tungstic acid was used as a contrast. Post-processing, reconstruction, visualization of 3D-images, morphometry and X-ray density assessment were carried out using software packages DataViewer (1.5.6.2), CTvox (3.3.0r1403), CT-analyser (1.18.4.0).

Results. The results obtained consist of three components: 1) general three-dimensional X-ray microtomographic visualization of chicken embryos in the early stages of embryogenesis with the designation of internal organs, allowing to determine the correct location of the heart; 2) microtomography of the heart with the designation of the main structures; 3) morphometric parameters of the embryo, heart and their X-ray density in units of the Hounsfield scale (HU). The methodological approach used has shown high efficiency. With an increase in the linear size of the chicken embryo and internal organs, including the heart, a high level of both general X-ray contrast and diffraction remains. At all the studied stages of the embryonic period of embryogenesis (4–8 days; HH22–HH34), the main visual and quantitative characteristics of cardiac morphogenesis were revealed.

1. Garcia P., Wang Y., Viallet J., Macek Jilkova Z. The Chicken Embryo Model: A Novel and Relevant Model for Immune-Based Studies. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021; 12: 791081. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.791081

2. Chen L. et al. Dynamic 3D-morphology of chick embryos and allantois depicted nondestructively by 3.0T clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Poultry Science. 2023; 102(9): 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102902

3. Vimalraj S., Renugaa S., Dhanasekaran A. Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane: a biomaterial testing platform for tissue engineering applications.

4. Process Biochemistry. 2023; 124: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procbio.2022.11.007

5. Wittig J.G., Münsterberg A. The Early Stages of Heart Development: Insights from Chicken Embryos. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2016; 3(2): 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd3020012

6. Vilches-Moure J.G. Embryonic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) as a model of cardiac biology and development. Comparative Medicine. 2019; 69(3): 184–203. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-18-000061

7. Lansford R., Rugonyi S. Follow Me! A Tale of Avian Heart Development with Comparisons to Mammal Heart Development. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2020; 7(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd7010008

8. Ma Y. et al. OCT based four-dimensional cardiac imaging of a living chick embryo using an impedance signal as a gating for post-acquisition synchronization. Biomedical Optics Express. 2022; 13(12): 6595–6609. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.476254

9. Raiola M., Sendra M., Torres M. Imaging Approaches and the Quantitative Analysis of Heart Development. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2023; 10(4): 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10040145

10. Sukumaran V., Mutlu O., Murtaza M., Alhalbouni R., Dubansky B., Yalcin H.C.

11. Experimental assessment of cardiovascular physiology in the chick embryo.

12. Developmental Dynamics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.589

13. Metscher B.D. MicroCT for developmental biology: A versatile tool for high-contrast 3D-imaging at histological resolutions. Developmental Dynamics. 2009; 238(3): 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21857

14. Hamburger V., Hamilton H.L. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Developmental Dynamics. 1992; 195(4): 231–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001950404

15. Bjørnstad S., Austdal L.P.E., Roald B., Glover J.C., Paulsen R.E. Cracking the Egg: Potential of the Developing Chicken as a Model System for Nonclinical Safety Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2015; 355(3): 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1124/ jpet.115.227025

16. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2020; 121. ISBN 978-1-882691-09-8

17. Rzhepakovsky I. et al. Anti-arthritic effect of chicken embryo tissue hydrolyzate against adjuvant arthritis in rats (X-ray microtomographic and histopathological analysis). Food Science & Nutrition. 2021; 9(10): 5648–5669. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2529

18. Nagdalian A.A. et al. Analysis of the content of mechanically separated poultry meat in sausage using computing microtomography. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2021; 100: 103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfca.2021.103918

19. Ragozina M.N. The development of the domestic chicken embryo in its relation to the yolk and shells of the egg (with tables of successive stages of development). Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR publ. 1961; 167 (In Russian).

20. Petrenko V.M. Morphogenesis of posterior vena cava in embriogenesis of domestic fowl. II. Formation of the stem. Advances in current natural sciences. 2014; (9-1): 55–58 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/sjlpsx

21. Zhang X., Yelbuz T.M., Cofer G.P., Choma M.A., Kirby M.L., Johnson G.A. Improved preparation of chick embryonic samples for magnetic resonance microscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2003; 49(6): 1192–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10460

22. Kim J.S., Min J., Recknagel A.K., Riccio M., Butcher J.T. Quantitative Three-Dimensional Analysis of Embryonic Chick Morphogenesis Via Microcomputed Tomography. The Anatomical Record. 2010; 294(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21276

23. Martinsen B.J. Reference guide to the stages of chick heart embryology. Developmental Dynamics. 2005; 233(4): 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20468

24. Ruffins S.W. et al. Digital Three-Dimensional Atlas of Quail Development Using High-Resolution MRI. The Scientific World Journal. 2007; 7: 259090. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.125

25. Tan G.X.Y., Jamil M., Tee N.G.Z., Zhong L., Yap C.H. 3D-reconstruction of Chick Embryo Vascular Geometries Using Non-invasive High-Frequency Ultrasound for Computational Fluid Dynamics Studies. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015; 43(11): 2780–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1339-y

26. Wang Y. et al. Aortic Arch Morphogenesis and Flow Modeling in the Chick Embryo. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2009; 37(6): 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9682-5

27.