New brucellosis erythrocyte diagnosticum for IHT in comparison with other serological methods (SAT, CFT, RBT and IDT)
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-34-37
Abstract
Relevance. Brucellosis is registered in many countries of the world, including Russia. The most unfavorable situation in the Russian Federation has developed in the Southern and North Caucasus Federal Districts. In the first place among the number of identified sick animals is the Dagestan Republic, where, despite the efforts of veterinary specialists, it is not possible to reduce the number of oci of brucellosis. With the help of classical methods (SAT, CFT), only 70% of animals infected with brucellosis can be detected. In this regard, domestic and foreign researchers have done a lot of work to improve existing and develop new diagnostic tools and methods.
Methods. One of the most sensitive methods for the diagnosis of brucellosis is the indirect hemagglutination reaction (IHT). In comparative tests in IHT, with an improved antigen, good results were obtained.
Results. The possibility of obtaining a highly active erythrocyte diagnosticum has been established with the combined use of two new surfactants: Progress products manufactured by AMC Media LLC (LosinoPetrovsk, Moscow region) and sodium dodecyl sulfate. The most rational parameters of the use of detergents for the treatment of brucella suspension and their optimal concentrations have been determined. It was found that IHT with a new antigen is specific and highly sensitive, compared with other serological reactions.
About the Authors
A. A. HalikovRussian Federation
Ahmed Aliashabovich Halikov, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
M. M. Mikailov
Russian Federation
Mikail Muslimovich Mikailov, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Leading Researcher
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
Sh. A. Gunashev
Russian Federation
Shakhrudin Alievich Gunashev, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
E. A. Yanikova
Russian Federation
Elmira Arslanovna Yanikova, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
D. M. Ramazanova
Russian Federation
Dzhavgarat Magomedovna Ramazanova, Research Associate
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
A. T. Gulieva
Russian Federation
Atiya Temirbolatovna Gulieva, Junior Research Assistant
88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000
References
1. Anagonu S.I., Sklyarov O.D., Vatnikov Yu.A. The particularities of the manifestation of animal brucellosis in African countries. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries. 2013; (2): 55–60 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2013-2-55-60
2. Bakanov D.S. The prevalence of brucellosis in the Republic of Ingushetia. Modern achievements of veterinary medicine and biotechnology. Collection of scientific papers of students, postgraduates and young scientists. Stavropol: Stavropol State Agrarian University. 2020; 136–139 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/iuoyzy
3. Dzhambulatov Z.M., Sakidibirov O.P., Akhmedov M.M., Gadzhiev B.M., Dzhabarova G.A., Baratov O.M. Brucellosis: problems and judgments. Development Problems of Regional Agro-Industrial Complex. 2018; (1): 80–84 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ytuhba
4. Agoltsov V.A., Veselovsky S.Yu., Chastov A.A., Popova O.M. Epidemiological and epizootic features of brucellosis in the Saratov region and Western Kazakhstan. Scientific life. 2017; (7): 92–100 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/zhtthh
5. Mikailov M.M., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A., Halikov A.A., Gulieva A.T., Ramazanova D.M. The problems of brucellosis of small ruminants in Dagestan Republic and its solution. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2021; (3): 38–40 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2021-3-11
6. Nurlygayanova G., Zyuzgina S., Skomorina Yu., Belousov V., Bazarbayev S. Brucellosis of cattle and small ruminants in the Central Federal District. Veterinariya selskokhozyaystvennykh zhivotnykh. 2022; (3): 7–12 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ukvrci
7. Fedorov A.I. et al. The effectiveness of diagnostic studies of brucellosis in animals. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2020; (1): 21–23 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2020-1-5
8. Rasulov S.A., Mirzoev D.M., Iskandarov M.I., Fedorov A.I., Iskandarova S.S., Albertyan M.P. Diagnostic value of modern and traditional methods of diagnosis brucellosis in small cattle. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2017; (2): 45–51 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ymrxsf
9. Gulyukin M.I. et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of measures against brucellosis in farm animals. Veterinary medicine. 2019; (11): 20–24 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2019.22.11.20-25
10. Murzaliev I. Brucellosis of sheep: how to prevent infection. Belorusskoe selskoe khozyaystvo. 2018; (3): 54, 55 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/cdjeud
11. Khairov S.G., Yusupov O.Yu. New erythrocytic brucellosis diagnosticum for IHR. Vestnik veterinarii. 2008; (2): 22–30 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/jtwjhd
12. Kabardiev S.Sh., Yusupov O.Yu. Scientific achievements and main results of investigations of the Caspian zonal research veterinary institute on the problem of brucellosis. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2018; (2): 47–50 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/xnhsrn
Review
For citations:
Halikov A.A., Mikailov M.M., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A., Ramazanova D.M., Gulieva A.T. New brucellosis erythrocyte diagnosticum for IHT in comparison with other serological methods (SAT, CFT, RBT and IDT). Agrarian science. 2023;1(10):34-37. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-34-37