Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

New brucellosis erythrocyte diagnosticum for IHT in comparison with other serological methods (SAT, CFT, RBT and IDT)

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-34-37

Abstract

Relevance. Brucellosis is registered in many countries of the world, including Russia. The most unfavorable situation in the Russian Federation has developed in the Southern and North Caucasus Federal Districts. In the first place among the number of identified sick animals is the Dagestan Republic, where, despite the efforts of veterinary specialists, it is not possible to reduce the number of oci of brucellosis. With the help of classical methods (SAT, CFT), only 70% of animals infected with brucellosis can be detected. In this regard, domestic and foreign researchers have done a lot of work to improve existing and develop new diagnostic tools and methods.

Methods. One of the most sensitive methods for the diagnosis of brucellosis is the indirect hemagglutination reaction (IHT). In comparative tests in IHT, with an improved antigen, good results were obtained.

Results. The possibility of obtaining a highly active erythrocyte diagnosticum has been established with the combined use of two new surfactants: Progress products manufactured by AMC Media LLC (LosinoPetrovsk, Moscow region) and sodium dodecyl sulfate. The most rational parameters of the use of detergents for the treatment of brucella suspension and their optimal concentrations have been determined. It was found that IHT with a new antigen is specific and highly sensitive, compared with other serological reactions.

About the Authors

A. A. Halikov
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Ahmed Aliashabovich Halikov, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



M. M. Mikailov
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Mikail Muslimovich Mikailov, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Leading Researcher

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



Sh. A. Gunashev
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Shakhrudin Alievich Gunashev, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



E. A. Yanikova
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Elmira Arslanovna Yanikova, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



D. M. Ramazanova
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Dzhavgarat Magomedovna Ramazanova, Research Associate

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



A. T. Gulieva
Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute — branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the Republic of Dagestan
Russian Federation

Atiya Temirbolatovna Gulieva, Junior Research Assistant

88 Dahadaev Str., Makhachkala, 367000



References

1. Anagonu S.I., Sklyarov O.D., Vatnikov Yu.A. The particularities of the manifestation of animal brucellosis in African countries. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries. 2013; (2): 55–60 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2013-2-55-60

2. Bakanov D.S. The prevalence of brucellosis in the Republic of Ingushetia. Modern achievements of veterinary medicine and biotechnology. Collection of scientific papers of students, postgraduates and young scientists. Stavropol: Stavropol State Agrarian University. 2020; 136–139 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/iuoyzy

3. Dzhambulatov Z.M., Sakidibirov O.P., Akhmedov M.M., Gadzhiev B.M., Dzhabarova G.A., Baratov O.M. Brucellosis: problems and judgments. Development Problems of Regional Agro-Industrial Complex. 2018; (1): 80–84 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ytuhba

4. Agoltsov V.A., Veselovsky S.Yu., Chastov A.A., Popova O.M. Epidemiological and epizootic features of brucellosis in the Saratov region and Western Kazakhstan. Scientific life. 2017; (7): 92–100 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/zhtthh

5. Mikailov M.M., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A., Halikov A.A., Gulieva A.T., Ramazanova D.M. The problems of brucellosis of small ruminants in Dagestan Republic and its solution. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2021; (3): 38–40 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2021-3-11

6. Nurlygayanova G., Zyuzgina S., Skomorina Yu., Belousov V., Bazarbayev S. Brucellosis of cattle and small ruminants in the Central Federal District. Veterinariya selskokhozyaystvennykh zhivotnykh. 2022; (3): 7–12 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ukvrci

7. Fedorov A.I. et al. The effectiveness of diagnostic studies of brucellosis in animals. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2020; (1): 21–23 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2020-1-5

8. Rasulov S.A., Mirzoev D.M., Iskandarov M.I., Fedorov A.I., Iskandarova S.S., Albertyan M.P. Diagnostic value of modern and traditional methods of diagnosis brucellosis in small cattle. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2017; (2): 45–51 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ymrxsf

9. Gulyukin M.I. et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of measures against brucellosis in farm animals. Veterinary medicine. 2019; (11): 20–24 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2019.22.11.20-25

10. Murzaliev I. Brucellosis of sheep: how to prevent infection. Belorusskoe selskoe khozyaystvo. 2018; (3): 54, 55 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/cdjeud

11. Khairov S.G., Yusupov O.Yu. New erythrocytic brucellosis diagnosticum for IHR. Vestnik veterinarii. 2008; (2): 22–30 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/jtwjhd

12. Kabardiev S.Sh., Yusupov O.Yu. Scientific achievements and main results of investigations of the Caspian zonal research veterinary institute on the problem of brucellosis. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2018; (2): 47–50 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/xnhsrn


Review

For citations:


Halikov A.A., Mikailov M.M., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A., Ramazanova D.M., Gulieva A.T. New brucellosis erythrocyte diagnosticum for IHT in comparison with other serological methods (SAT, CFT, RBT and IDT). Agrarian science. 2023;1(10):34-37. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-34-37

Views: 352


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X