The productivity of spring wheat and the content of certain groups of microorganisms in the soil depend on nanopreparations
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-382-5-69-73
Abstract
Relevance. An important factor in reducing the dependence of crop productivity on various limiting factors is the use of fertilizers and biological products, which include nano-preparations. The work studied the effect of nano-preparations on the productivity of spring wheat and individual microbiological indicators of sod-podzolic light loamy soil when regulating the water-air regime.
Methods. The research was carried out at the Gubino agro-testing site (Tver region) on soddy-podzolic light loamy drained soil. When the humidity in the 0–50 cm layer decreased below 70% of the PPV, the water regime was regulated by irrigation. Nanopreparations fulvohumate “Ivan Ovsinsky” and n-BoGum were used by spraying spring wheat plants of the Irgina variety. Nanopreparations were studied both separately and against the background of organic fertilizer — multi-purpose compost at a dose of 10 t/ha. Determination of individual groups of microorganisms in the soil was carried out using generally accepted methods in microbiology.
Results. During the three-year experiment, a significant increase (significance of differences p < 0.05) in the yield of spring wheat was obtained in the variants with nanopreparations relative to the control. Their use against the background of multi-purpose compost when regulating the water-air regime gave the highest wheat productivity in all years of research. The effect of both nanopreparations was almost the same. The yield increase from nanopreparations relative to multi-purpose compost over an average of three years was 18–20% for irrigation and 11–13% for non-irrigation options and amounted to 3.58 t/ha and 2.83 t/ha respectively. When regulating the water regime, the content of ammonifying and phosphate-mobilizing microorganisms increased, associated with optimal hydration for their vital functions. This was especially evident during the dry period, when irrigation was carried out. The largest number of studied microorganisms was observed in the variants of multi-purpose compost + nanopreparations and with the addition of only multi-purpose compost. At the same time, a high connection with productivity was noted.
About the Authors
T. S. ZinkovskayaRussian Federation
Tatyana Stepanovna Zinkovskaya, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Fertility Laboratory of the Biotechnology Department
7 Pyzhevsky Lane, 2 building, Moscow, 119017
G. Yu. Rabinovich
Russian Federation
Galina Yuryevna Rabinovich, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Biotechnologies
7 Pyzhevsky Lane, 2 building, Moscow, 119017
E. A. Podolyan
Russian Federation
Elena Aleksandrovna Podolyan, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Junior Researcher at the Fertility Laboratory of the Biotechnology Department
7 Pyzhevsky Lane, 2 building, Moscow, 119017
References
1. Fedorenko V.F. (ed.). Nanotechnologies and nanomaterials in the agro-industrial complex. Moscow: Rosinformagrotech. 2011; 311. ISBN 978-5-7367-0855-0 https://elibrary.ru/tkfjdn
2. Yurin V.M., Molchan O.V. Nanomaterials and рlants: look at the problem. Proceedings of the Belarusian State University. Series of Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Biology Sciences. 2015; 10(1): 9–21 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/zioxrj
3. Afonina I.A., Afonina N.E., Nikiforova T.E. The biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts. NovaInfo. 2019; 107: 1–4 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/lnhhqo
4. Kuppusamy Р., Yusoff М.М., Maniam G.P., Govindan N. Biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant derivatives and their new avenues in pharmacological applications — An updated report. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2016; 24(4): 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.013
5. Mariyam S., Upadhyay S.K., Chakraborty K., Verma K.K., Duhan J.S., Muneer S., Meena M., Sharma R.K., Ghodake G., Chandra Shekhar Seth C.S. Nanotechnology, a frontier in agricultural science, a novel approach in abiotic stress management and convergence with new age medicine-A review. Science of The Total Environment. 2024; 912: 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169097
6. Prudnikov A.D., Prudnikova A.G., Porushkova M.A. Efficiency of nanopreparations in fiber flax seed production. Agroecological aspects of sustainable development of the agro-industrial complex. Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific Conference. Kokino: Bryansk State Agrarian University. 2020; 652–658 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/iaeotc
7. Babu S. et al. Nanofertilizers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere. 2022; 292: 133451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451
8. Timofeev V.N. Iron nanoparticles in cultivation of spring wheat. Epokha nauki. 2021; 27: 13–18 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2409-3203-2021-27-13-18
9. Konova A.M. et al. The influence of nanopreparations (Co, Zn, Fe) and fertilizers “Nutrivant plus” and “Gringo” on productivity of flax. Agrochemical Herald. 2020; (4): 57–61 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/10-9-2551-2020-10056
10. Ampleeva L.E., Rybkina D.A. Nanotechnology in the agricultural sector: prospects for nano-preparations. Innovative scientific and technological solutions for agriculture: contribution of university science. Proceedings of the 74th International scientific and practical conference. Ryazan: Ryazan State Agrotechnological University Named after P.A. Kostychev. 2023; 1: 8–13 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ttuisl
11. Sarkar T. et al. Underutilized green leafy vegetables: frontier in fortified food development and nutrition. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2023; 63(33): 11679–11733. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2095555
12. Ahmad B. et al. Phyto‐fabrication, purification, characterisation, optimisation, and biological competence of nano‐silver. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2021; (15): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1049/nbt2.1200718-AHMADET AL.
13. Rajakumar G. et al. Yttrium Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis: An Overview of Methods of Preparation and Biomedical Applications. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(5): 2172. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052172
14. Yurkova I.N., Omelchenko A.V., Bugara I.A. The influence of silver nanoparticles on wheat growth process. ESSUTM Bulletin. 2014; (1): 69–73 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/sdekiv
15. Gorelkin P., Kalinina N., Love A., Makarov V., Taliansky M., Yaminsky I. Synthesis of nanoparticles using plants. Nanoindustry. 2012; (7): 16–23 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/pejdhv
16. Makarov V.V. et al. Green Nanotechnologies: Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Plants. Acta Naturae. 2014; 6(1): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2014-6-1-35-44
17. Farus O.A. Evaluation of the effect of silver nanoparticles on the growth and development of cress. Nanoindustry. 2023; 16(6): 354–361 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/lqdymi
18. Zelenkov V.N., Potapov V.V. Hydrothermal nanosilica in agricultural crop and biotechnology. Nanoindustry. 2020; 13(1): 22–33 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22184/1993-8578.2020.13.1.22.33
19. El-Azeim M.M.A., Sherif M.A., Hussien M.S., Tantawy I.A.A., Bashandy S.O. Impacts of nano- and non-nanofertilizers on potato quality and productivity. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2020; 40(5): 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.12.007
20. Zinkovsky V.N., Zinkovskaya T.S. Considering atmospheric precipitations at agromeliorative calculations. International Research Journal. 2018; (5): 130–135 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2018.71.019
Review
For citations:
Zinkovskaya T.S., Rabinovich G.Yu., Podolyan E.A. The productivity of spring wheat and the content of certain groups of microorganisms in the soil depend on nanopreparations. Agrarian science. 2024;(5):69-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-382-5-69-73