The effective significance of different options for harvesting fermented feed
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-383-6-87-92
Abstract
Relevance. The production of fermented feed is associated with the need to change and improve the digestibility of nutrients in both ruminants and other animals. The use of the fermentation process significantly affects the level of pathogenic microorganisms in the feed. In recent years, much attention has been paid to the development of bacterial starter cultures that regulate microbiological processes during silage.
The aim of the study was to study the nutritional changes of fermented feed (silage) using bacterial starter cultures «Silostan» and probiotic drug «Lactobifadol forte».
Metods. Research objects: «Silostan» – a feed additive for silage of vegetable raw materials; probiotic, which is used to restore microflora and digestion in animals, «Lactobifadol forte» for cattle.
Results. The preparation of corn silage with the introduction of a complex bacterial starter culture «Silostan» and «Lactobifadol forte» contributes to the better preservation of dry matter and nutrients in the feed product. The use of corn silage with the introduction of starter cultures, compared with self-preservation in the diet of cattle, increases the adhesion of rumen microorganisms to feed particles and, as a result, will lead to better digestibility of feed nutrients and increase nutrient availability and productivity.
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out at the expense of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation № 23-16-00061.
About the Authors
E. V. Sheida
Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Vladimirovna Sheida, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Researcher; Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher
29 9th January Str., Orenburg, 460000;
13 Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018
O. V. Kvan
Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga Vilorievna Kvan, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Acting Head of the Feeding Department; Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher
29 9th January Str., Orenburg, 460000;
13 Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018
V. V. Grechkina
Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Orenburg State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria Vladimirovna Grechkina, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Non-Infectious Animal Diseases; Acting Head of the laboratory
29 9th January Str., Orenburg, 460000;
18 Chelyuskintsev Str., Orenburg, 460014
Yu. A. Sechnev
Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri Andreevich Sechnev, Postgraduate Student
29 9th January Str., Orenburg, 460000
A. V. Kharlamov
Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anatoly Vasilyevich Kharlamov, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
29 9th January Str., Orenburg, 460000
References
1. Michalak M., Wojnarowski K., Cholewińska P., Szeligowska N., Bawej M., Pacoń J. Selected Alternative Feed Additives Used to Manipulate the Rumen Microbiome. Animals. 2021; 11(6): 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061542
2. Herlinae H., Yemima Y., Rumiasih R. Effect of Additives EM4 and Palm Sugar on The Characteristics of Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Silage. Journal of Tropical Animal Science. 2015; 4(1): 27–30 (in Indonesian).
3. Nega T., Woldes Y. Review on nutritional limitations and opportunities of using rapeseed meal and other rape seed by products in animal feeding. Journal of Nutritional Health & Food Engineering. 2018; 8(1): 43–48. https://doi.org/10.15406/jnhfe.2018.08.00254
4. Bondarchuk O.N., Ermolaev V.A. Food waste fermentation. Actual scientific and technical means and agricultural problems. Proceedings of the VIII National Scientific and Practical conference with international participation dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Academy. Kemerovo: Kuzbass State Agricultural Academy. 2022; 115‒117 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ukcfew
5. Wang C., Shi C., Zhang Y., Song D., Lu Z., Wang Y. Microbiota in fermented feed and swine gut. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018; 102(7): 2941–2948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8829-4
6. Canibe N., Jensen B.B. Fermented liquid feed — Microbial and nutritional aspects and impact on enteric diseases in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2012; 173(1–2): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.021
7. Kulishov B.A., Tuan L.A., Kanarsky A.V. Utilization of waste from processing plant raw materials in bioreactors for solid-phase fermentation. Herald of Technological University. 2015; 18(3): 286‒290 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tjummh
8. Dai Z. et al. Fermentation techniques in feed production. Bazer F.W., Lamb G.C., Wu G. (eds.). Animal Agriculture. Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations. Academic Press. 2020; 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00024-0
9. Basu S., Gaur R., Gomes J., Sreekrishnan T.R., Bisaria V.S. Effect of seed culture on solid-state bioconversion of wheat straw by Phanerochaete chrysosporium for animal feed production. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2002; 93(1): 25–30.
10. Shrivastava B., Thakur S., Khasa Y.P., Gupte A., Puniya A.K., Kuhad R.C. White-rot fungal conversion of wheat straw to energy rich cattle feed. Biodegradation. 2011; 22(4): 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9408-2
11. Chi C.-H., Cho S.-J. Improvement of bioactivity of soybean meal by solidstate fermentation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens versus Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT — Food Science and Technology. 2016; 68(9): 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.002
12. Shi C. et al. Amino acid, phosphorus, and energy digestibility of Aspergillus niger fermented rapeseed meal fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2015; 93(6): 2916–2925. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8326
13. Canibe N., Højberg O., Badsberg J.H., Jensen B.B. Effect of feeding fermented liquid feed and fermented grain on gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance in piglets. Journal of Animal Science. 2007; 85(11): 2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-744
14. Brooks P.H. Fermented liquid feed for pigs. CABI Reviews. 2008; (3): 073. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20083073
15. Kiesz M.E. The effectiveness of fermented soybean meal and (or) rapeseed meal in sows and weaners feeding. Summary of PhD thesis. Lublin. 2019; 28 (in Polish).
16. Ran T., Gomaa W.M.S., Shen Y.Z., Saleem A.M., Yang W.Z., McAllister T.A. Use of naturally sourced feed additives (lactobacillus fermentation products and enzymes) in growing and finishing steers: Effects on performance, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2019; 254: 114190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.05.013
17. Azlan P.M., Jahromi M.F., Ariff M.O., Ebrahimi M., Candyrine S.C.L., Liang J.B. Aspergillus terreus treated rice straw suppresses methane production and enhances feed digestibility in goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2018; 50(3): 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1470-x
18. Lesmeister K.E., Heinrichs A.J., Gabler M.T. Effects of Supplemental Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Culture on Rumen Development, Growth Characteristics, and Blood Parameters in Neonatal Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science. 2004; 87(6): 1832–1839. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73340-8
19. Lasygina Yu.A. The effect of “Lactobifadol forte” on meat productivity and meat quality of Simmental bulls. Development and adoption of innovations in animal husbandry. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference. Orenburg: All-Russian Research Institute of Meat Cattle Breeding. 2013; 103‒105 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/rlxhbp
20. Shrivastava B. et al. Solid state bioconversion of wheat straw into digestible and nutritive ruminant feed by Ganoderma sp. rckk02. Bioresource Technology. 2012; 107: 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.096
21. Kondakova Ch.S., Yapryntseva E.V., Drozdova E.A., Kurilkina M.Ya. The dependence of adhesive activity rumen bacterias and digestibility from making mineral supplements. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2011; (15): 67–70 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/oydeyf
Review
For citations:
Sheida E.V., Kvan O.V., Grechkina V.V., Sechnev Yu.A., Kharlamov A.V. The effective significance of different options for harvesting fermented feed. Agrarian science. 2024;(6):87-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-383-6-87-92
Views:
215
Email this article 