Comparison of modern raspberry varieties long cane
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-383-6-100-105
Abstract
Relevance. Modern raspberry varieties (Rubus idaeus L.) have great potential for cultivation using Long Cane technology.
Methods. The study compared raspberry varieties Ovation, Wengi, and Vajolet. Seedlings were obtained from root cuttings, then grown from April 2021 to July 2022 for the summer harvest and from April 2022 to October 2022 for the fall harvest.
Results. It has been established that varietal characteristics and the fruiting period significantly affect the indicators. The largest fruits are in the Wengi variety (length 25.5 mm, diameter 24.3 mm, weight 7.2 g), the smallest are in the Ovation variety (length 22.2 mm, diameter 22.5 mm, weight 4.9 g). When observing varieties at different ripening periods, it was found that the fruit length (27.3 mm) and fruit weight (8.3 mm) during the summer fruiting period are maximum in the Wengi variety, and minimum in the Vajolet variety. The amount of sugar ranges from 11 to 13°Bx, the percentage of ripe fruits from 84.5 to 94.5. The difference between the Wengi and Ovation varieties in terms of vegetative characteristics at different growing periods has been reliably proven. During the summer fruiting period, the yield per shoot for Wengi was 2615 g, for Vajolet – 485 g. The Wengi variety was distinguished by its maximum length (27.3 mm) and fruit weight (8.3 g). Based on all the indicators, the most promising varieties for summer fruiting are Wengi and Vajolet, and for autumn fruiting – Ovation.
Supporting agencies: This research was funded by Institutional research project № 122042700002-6 of the Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the RAS.
About the Authors
O. V. Ladyzhenskaya
Tsistsin Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga Victorovna Ladyzhenskaya, Researcher Laboratory of Cultivated Plants
4 Botanicheskaya Str., Moscow, 127276
S. S. Letunovsky
Research and production nursery «Malinovii Rai»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Sergeevich Letunovsky, Director
7 Lesnaya Str., Maryino village, Michurinsky district, Tambov region, 393754
T. S. Aniskina
Tsistsin Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana Sergeevna Aniskina, Researcher at the Laboratory of Cultivated Plants
4 Botanicheskaya Str., Moscow, 127276
V. A. Kryuchkova
Tsistsin Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria Alexandrovna Kryuchkova, Candidate of Biological Sciences; Assistant Professor, Leading Researcher
4 Botanicheskaya Str., Moscow, 127276
M. V. Simakhin
Tsistsin Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim Vyacheslavovich Simakhin, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Researcher
4 Botanicheskaya Str., Moscow, 127276
References
1. Barney D.L., Miles C. (eds.). Commercial Red Raspberry Production in the Parcific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Extension publication PNW 176. Oregon State University. 2007; iv, 104.
2. Sazonova I.D. Biochemical assessment of raspberry and currant berries in the south-western part of the non-black earth region of Russia. Vestnik Bryansk State Agricultural Academy. 2021; (5): 36–44 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.52691/2500-2651-2021-87-5-36-44
3. Schulz M., Chim J.F. Nutritional and bioactive value of Rubus berries. Food Bioscience. 2019; 31: 100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2019.100438
4. Zhbanova E.V. Fruit of Raspberry Rubus idaeus L. as a Source of Functional Ingredients (Review). Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2020; 48(1): 5–14 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2018-1-5-14
5. Heide O.M., Sønsteby A. Physiology of flowering and dormancy regulation in annual- and biennial-fruiting red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) — a review. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2011; 86(5): 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2011.11512785
6. Palonen P., Laine T., Mouhu K. Floricane yield and berry quality of seven primocane red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 2021; 285: 110201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110201
7. Hodnefjell R., Heide O.M., Rivero R., Remberg S.F., Sønsteby A. Control of growth cessation and floral initiation in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cultivars of diverse origin in controlled and natural environments. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018; 233: 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.011
8. Dobrenkov E.A., Semеnova L.G. Raspberry varieties ex vitro in the field in the South of Russia. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2021; 70(4): 70–80 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30679/2219-5335-2021-4-70-70-80
9. Kempler C., Daubeny H.A. Red raspberry cultivars and selections from the pacific agri-food research centre. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 777: IX International Rubus and Ribes Symposium. ISHS. 2008; 6. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.777.6
10. Tan C.H., Daia H.P., Lu J., Shi W. Raspberry production in greenhouse in Northeast China. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1277: XII International Rubus and Ribes Symposium: Innovative Rubus and Ribes Production for High Quality Berries in Changing Environments. ISHS. 2020; 36. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1277.36
11. Sergeeva O.V., Razuvaeva K.P. Methods of isolation and identification of soil nematodes of the Longidoridae family in the conditions of quarantine laboratories. Izvestiya Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University. 2019; 54: 69–73 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2078-1318-2019-11069
12. Dale A. Raspberry production in greenhouses: physiological aspects. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 777: IX International Rubus and Ribes Symposium. ISHS. 2008; 32. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.777.32
13. Herckens K., Boonen M., Bylemans. D. Year round production of the primocane raspberry “Kwanza”. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1265: XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: III International Berry Fruit Symposium. ISHS. 2019; 20. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1265.20
14. Rolbiecki S., Rolbiecki R., Rzekanowski C. Effect of micro-irrigation on the growth and yield of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cv. “Polana” grown in very light soil. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 585: VIII International Rubus and Ribes Symposium. ISHS. 2002; 108. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.585.108
15. Krawiec P., Rybczyński R. Fertigation efficiency of pimocane-fruiting raspberry varieties. Acta Agrophysica. 2010; 16(2): 347–358 (in Polish).
16. Carew J.G., Gillespie T., White J., Wainwright H., Brennan R., Battey N.H. Techniques for manipulation of the annual growth cycle in raspberry. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2000; 75(5): 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2000.11511276
17. Kunze K.E. T-duality and Penrose limits of spatially homogeneous and inhomogeneous cosmologies. Physical Review D. 2003; 68(6): 063517. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.063517
Review
For citations:
Ladyzhenskaya O.V., Letunovsky S.S., Aniskina T.S., Kryuchkova V.A., Simakhin M.V. Comparison of modern raspberry varieties long cane. Agrarian science. 2024;(6):100-105. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-383-6-100-105
Views:
516
Email this article 