Forecast distribution of technologies for processing pig and poultry manure in the Russian Federation to take measures for GHG reduction

Relevance. Greenhouse gas emissions have been one of the most important problems in recent years. Their main source in the agricultural sector of the Russian Federation is the processing of animal by-products. In 2021, emissions amounted to 121,285 thousand tons of CO2-eq.
The purpose of the study is to establish how the technologies for processing pig manure and chicken manure are distributed in various natural and climatic conditions of the Russian Federation.
Methods. The data of surveys of pig and poultry breeding complexes were analyzed, reflecting the amount of manure (manure) formed, broken down by humidity and storage volumes in storages; types of manure collection and storage systems; the ratio of their use in federal districts combined into three zones, taking into account natural and climatic characteristics. Based on the results of the analysis, the basic (according to the data of 2021) and forecast (for 2025) distribution of technologies for processing pig manure and chicken manure were obtained. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from processing systems were calculated for zone 3, where there were significant differences between the baseline and forecast distributions of technologies. Direct emissions of nitrous oxide and methane in terms of CO2 equivalent in the regions of this zone, according to the National Cadastre, amount to 752.4 thousand tons per year; when calculated based on updated data on the basic distribution of technologies (2021) — 1038 thousand tons per year; when calculated on the basis of updated data on the projected distribution of technologies (2025) — 1110 thousand tons per year.
Results. The results of the study showed the need to review the practice of using manure (manure) processing technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

1. Romanovskaya A.A., Korotkov V.N., Polumieva P.D., Trunov A.A., Vertyankina V.Yu., Karaban R.T. Greenhouse gas fluxes and mitigation potential for managed lands in the Russian Federation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2020; 25(8): 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09885-2

2. Strokov A., Deppermann A., Potashnikov V., Romanovskaya A., Havlik P. Problems of agricultural policy adaptation within sustainable development goals. Economic Policy. 2020; 15(6): 140–165 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/iakaze

3. Strokov A.S. Greenhouse gas emissions in crop production. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2021; 91(3): 265–272 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321030099

4. Genstwa N., Zmyślona J. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Efficiency in Polish Agriculture. Agriculture. 2024; 14(1): 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14010056

5. Višković M.I., Đatkov Đ.M., Nesterović A.Ž., Martinov M.L., Cvetković S.M. Manure in Serbia — quantities and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade. 2022; 67(1): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2201029V

6. Wu J.-P., Li M.-L., Wang Y., Lin S., Hu R.-G., Xiang R.-B. Impact of bentonite on greenhouse gas emissions during pig manure composting and its subsequent application. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023; 344: 118453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118453

7. Kreidenweis U., Breier J., Herrmann C., Libra J., Prochnow A. Greenhouse gas emissions from broiler manure treatment options are lowest in wellmanaged biogas production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 280(2): 124969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124969

8. Bao M., Cui H., Lv Y., Wang L., Ou Y., Hussain N. Greenhouse gas emission during swine manure aerobic composting: Insight from the dissolved organic matter associated microbial community succession. Bioresource Technology. 2023; 373: 128729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128729

9. Zhu Z., Li L., Dong H., Wang Y. Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Different Types of Livestock and Poultry Manure During Storage. Transactions of the ASABE. 2020; 63(6): 1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14079

10. Yang Y. et al. Effects of dicyandiamide, phosphogypsum and superphosphate on greenhouse gas emissions during pig manure composting. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 846: 157487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157487

11. Wang C. et al. Reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions through a combination of pig manure and reduced inorganic fertilizer application in a double-rice cropping system: Three-year results. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2022; 326: 107799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107799

12. Parodi A., Gerrits W.J.J., Van Loon J.J.A., De Boer I.J.M., Aarnink A.J.A., Van Zanten H.H.E. Black soldier fly reared on pig manure: Bioconversion efficiencies, nutrients in the residual material, greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. Waste Management. 2021; 126: 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.001

13. Kuznetsov E.V., Khadzhidi A.E., Kuznetsova M.E., Zvonkov N.K. Processing of waste of animal enterprises. Scientific Works of the Kuban State Technological University. 2019; 3: 864–873 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/vhvnmf

14. Lipka O.N., Romanovskaya А.А., Semenov S.M. Applied aspects of adaptation to climate change in Russia. Fundamental and Applied Climatology. 2020; 1: 65–90 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21513/2410-8758-2020-1-65-90

15. Chekmarev P.A., Rodionov V.Ya., Lukin S.V. Experience with organic fertilizers in Belgorod region. Achievements of science and technology in agribusiness. 2011; 2: 3–4 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ntldwv

16. Vlasov V.A., Voronov G.E. Some theoretical and practical problems that arise when handling liquid waste from livestock products (Part one). Law and State: the theory and practice. 2022; 3: 205–209 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2022_3_205

17. Guz L.V., Petrov I.B. On the use of livestock waste in economic activities. Tverdyye bytovyye otkhody. 2021; 1: 56–59 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/disdvq

18. Shalavina E.V., Vasiliev E.V., Papushin E.A. Analysis of technologies for processing animal waste in different natural and climatic conditions of Russia. AgroEcoEngineering. 2023; 3: 110–124 (in Russian). https://doi.org/ 10.24412/2713-2641-2023-3116-110-123