Catalase activity in milk and its correlation with milk productivity of cows depending on the duration of lactation
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-385-8-118-123
Abstract
Relevance. The purpose of this work is to study the activity of catalase in the milk of healthy cows with different levels of productivity and to find a correlation between the studied indicators, which is important and relevant in terms of assessing the antioxidant activity of cows’ milk.
Methods. The analysis of biochemical parameters of cow’s milk was carried out using the “CombiFoss 7” system (Denmark). The analysis of the total amount of water-soluble antioxidants (TAWSA) was performed on the device “Tsvet-Yauza 01-AA”. Statistical processing of the obtained results was carried out in the Microsoft Excel programs using the “Data Analysis” package, the “R” program (“Psych” package). Milk samples were obtained from black-and-white cows during a whole year.
Results. The entire sample of animals (N = 280) is divided into 6 groups by lactation days: 11–30, 31–60, 61–90, 91–120, 121–180 and 180–300 days (groups 1–6). In the first 11–30 days of lactation (group 1), the value of SKVA is significantly higher (17.2 mg/ml) than in the following months. Moreover, the values of the SKVA fluctuate quite strongly. Significant changes were observed for catalase activity: from 1.41 and 1.32 rel. units (groups 1 and 6) to 0.44 rel. units (group 3). During the period of bloating and lactation decline (groups 1 and 6), the highest correlation coefficients between catalase and fat are observed — 0.51 and 0.57, respectively. For all periods of lactation, there is a negative correlation of catalase with true protein. Thus, the activity of catalase in the milk of healthy cows at different periods of lactation was studied and correlations between the studied indicators were found.
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the framework of state assignment No. 124020200032-4 (FGGN-2024-0016).
About the Authors
A. A. Savina
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia Anatolyevna Savina, Researcher of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Farm Animals
60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk, Moscow Region, 142132
O. A. Voronina
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana Alexandrovna Voronina , Senior Researcher of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Farm Animals, Candidate of Biological Sciences
60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk, Moscow Region, 142132
S. Yu. Zaitsev
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Yurievich Zaitsev, Leading Researcher of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Farm Animals, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor
60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk, Moscow Region, 142132
References
1. Farman A.A., Hadwan M.H. Simple kinetic method for assessing catalase activity in biological samples. Methods X. 2021; 8: 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101434
2. Silanikove N., Merin U., Leitner G. Nitrite and catalase levels rule oxidative stability and safety properties of milk: a review. RSC Advances. 2014; 4(50): 26476‒26486. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03851G
3. Lindmark-Månsson H., Åkesson B. Antioxidative factors in milk. British journal of Nutrition. 2000; 84(S1): 103‒110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500002324
4. Ventsova I., Safonov V. Biochemical Screening of Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Protection in Imported Cows During Adaptation. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2021; 9(8): 1203‒1210. http://doi.org/10.17582/ journal.aavs/2021/9.8.1203.1210
5. Dobriyan E.I. Dairy antioxidant system. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2020; 82(2): 101‒106 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-2-101-106
6. Zámocký M., Gasselhuber B., Furtmüller P.G., Obinger C. Molecular evolution of hydrogen peroxide degrading enzymes. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2012; 525(2): 131‒144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2012.01.017
7. Foroughi L.M., Kang Y.-N., Matzger A.J. Sixty years from discovery to solution: crystal structure of bovine liver catalase form III. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography. 2011; 67(9): 756‒762. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444911024486
8. Ko T.-P. et al. Structure of human erythrocyte catalase. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography. 2000; 56(2): 241‒245. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999015930
9. Wu Y., Jiang S., Fu Z. Employment of teicoplanin-coated magnetic particles for quantifying gram-positive bacteria via catalase-catalyzed hydrolysis reaction of H2O2. Talanta. 2020; 211: 120728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120728
10. Pavlenko O.B., Vasilenko V.N. Symbiotic microflora of the udder of healthy cows and heifers, its role in the etiology of mastitis. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2011; 4: 132‒136 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/owgjxp
11. Naqqash T., Wazir N., Aslam K., Shabir G., Tahir M., Shaikh R.S. First report on the probiotic potential of Mammaliicoccus sciuri isolated from raw goat milk. Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health. 2022; 41(4): 149‒159. https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.2021-022
12. Alharbi N.K., Alsaloom A.N. Characterization of Lactic Bacteria Isolated from Raw Milk and Their Antibacterial Activity against Bacteria as the Cause of Clinical Bovine Mastitis. Journal of Food Quality. 2021; 1: 6466645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6466645
13. Taye Y., Degu T., Fesseha H., Mathewos M. Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Cow Milk and Milk Products. The Scientific World Journal. 2021; 1: 4697445. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4697445
14. Lorenzen P.C., Martin D., Clawin-Rädecker I., Barth K., Knappstein K. Activities of alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyltransferase and lactoperoxidase in cow, sheep and goat’s milk in relation to heat treatment. Small Ruminant Research. 2010; 89(1): 18‒23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.013
15. Fedosova A.N., Kaledina M.V., Voloshchenko L.V. Psychrotrophic Bacteria of Raw Milkin the Technology of Semi-Hard Cheese. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2020; 3: 171‒180 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.306
16. Savina A.A., Voronina О.A., Zaitsev S.Yu. Seasonal patterns of changes in antioxidant and microelement parameters of milk from black-and-white cows. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2023; 24(5): 858‒867 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.5.858-867
17. Klyapnev A.V., Velikanov V.I., Yankovskaya M.O., Pogodina A.V., Klyuev N.V. Comparative veterinary-sanitary examination of milk from different producers. The Veterinarny Vrach. 2021; 5: 16‒24 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/eqjrku
18. Tsatsulina A.P., Bocharova K.V., Ermakova N.V. Study of catalase activity in cow’s milk. Setevoy nauchnyy zhurnal OrelGAU. 2014; 2: 28‒29 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tkquln
19. Stobiecka M., Król J., Brodziak A. Antioxidant Activity of Milk and Dairy Products. Animals. 2022; 12(3): 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030245
20. Shсherbakova Yu.V., Ziganshin D.D., Pashina A.S., Ahmadullina F.Yu. The effect of the pasteurization regime on the catalase activity of milk. Herald of Kazan Technological University. 2014; 17(16): 173‒174 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/stiewx
21. Azimov G.I. How milk is formed. Moscow: Kolos. 1965; 159 (in Russian).
22. Tsyupko V.V. Cows’ milk composition and regularities of fat, protein and lactose synthesis. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology. Medicine. 2012; 3(2): 96‒101 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/pxintv
23. Sprinchan E.G., Bologa M.K., Stepurina T.G., Bologa A.M., Polikarpov A.A. Peculiarities of the electric activation of whey. Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry. 2011; 47(1): 66‒69. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375511010182
Review
For citations:
Savina A.A., Voronina O.A., Zaitsev S.Yu. Catalase activity in milk and its correlation with milk productivity of cows depending on the duration of lactation. Agrarian science. 2024;1(8):118-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-385-8-118-123
Views:
192
Email this article 