Problems of a digital model formation in agriculture
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-385-8-188-193
Abstract
Relevance. The presence of digital gaps slows down the digital transformation of agriculture and, accordingly, slows down the manifestation of the positive effects of digitalization. The identified issues determine the relevance of the study of digital gaps in agricultural sectors.
The purpose of the article is to assess the digital gaps that hinder the complex digital transformation of agricultural sectors.
Methods. The research methodology is based on theoretical approaches and concepts that substantiate the advantages of digitalization of economic sectors and consider technological progress as the main factors of economic growth. The research methodology involves the identification of intra-industry digital gaps by consistently assessing the level of organizations in the agricultural sector using specific software products and digital technologies that together form a digital model of agriculture.
Results. The results showed the presence of significant intra-industry digital gaps, manifested in the proportion of organizations using software products and digital technologies. The lack of integrated use of software products and digital technologies that form the digital model of agriculture leads to low rates of digital transformation, since there is a gap between systems that automatically collect data on the condition of plants and animals, systems of robotic equipment and automatic correction based on artificial intelligence technologies.
About the Authors
A. E. Plakhin
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Evgenievich Plakhin, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Doctor of Economics
62/45 8th Marta Str. / Narodnaya Volya Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144
E. S. Ogorodnikova
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Sergeevna Ogorodnikova, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Candidate of Economic Sciences
62/45 8th Marta Str. / Narodnaya Volya Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144
K. V. Rostovtsev
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin Viktorovich Rostovtsev, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Candidate of Economic Sciences
62/45 8th Marta Str. / Narodnaya Volya Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144
References
1. Astakhova T.N., Kolbanev M.O., Romanova A.A., Shamin A.A. Model of digital agriculture. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2019; 7(12): 63–69 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/dsiwvi
2. Torikov V.E., Pogonyshev V.A., Pogonysheva D.A., Dornyh G.E. State of digital transformation of agriculture. Vestnik of Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2020; 9: 6–13 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/conngk
3. Bannikov S.A., Garbuzova T.G., Losev A.N. Digital maturity of agriculture: research results and assessment methodology. Bulletin NGIEI. 2023; 10: 67–77 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ghmgmg
4. Oborin M.S. Digital innovative technologies in agriculture. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2022; 5: 82–92 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-220-05-82-92
5. Usenko L.N., Kholodov O.A. Digital transformation of agriculture. Accounting and statistics. 2019; 1: 87–102 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tchbiv
6. Kurdyumov A.V., Korolev A.V. Introduction of digital technologies in agriculture. Moscow Economic Journal. 2020; 12: 369–383 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2020-10867
7. Dobrinskaya D.E., Martynenko T.S. Perspectives of the Russian information society: Digital divide levels. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2019; 19(1): 108–120 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-108-120
8. Robinson L. et al. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society. 2015; 18(5): 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
9. OECD. Understanding the Digital Divide. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 49. Paris: OECD Publications. 2001; 32. https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766
10. Zholobova A.I., Ergunova O.T. The usage of digital twins in agriculture. Questions of Industrial Economics. 2023; 2: 31–39 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/egsrbx
11. Abbasi R., Martinez P., Ahmad R. The digitization of agricultural industry — a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2022; 2: 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100042
Review
For citations:
Plakhin A.E., Ogorodnikova E.S., Rostovtsev K.V. Problems of a digital model formation in agriculture. Agrarian science. 2024;1(8):188-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-385-8-188-193
Views:
197
Email this article 