Assessment of morphophysiological parameters of resistance of various varieties of winter rye to chloride salinity in laboratory conditions
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-387-10-134-138
Abstract
Determining the tolerance of cultivated plants to salts is considered important and necessary in breeding practice in areas with primary and secondary soil salinization. This article examines the effect of salinity (NaCl) in laboratory conditions on the growth and development of plants of three varieties of winter rye (Chusovaya, Yantarnaya, Alisa) and the effectiveness of early diagnosis on resistance to the stress factor. The purpose of the study was to determine the resistance of winter rye varieties to chloride salinity based on the variability of morphophysiological characteristics under simulated conditions. Based on the identified differences in indicators characterizing the growth processes of plants in vegetation vessels in the control and on the substrate with NaCl, the varieties according to resistance to salt stress are distributed in the following order: Chusovaya, Yantarnaya, Alisa. The data obtained indicate the specificity of the response of varieties to a stress factor. It is shown that for a more objective characterization of genotypes for salt tolerance, a comprehensive study of traits (seed germination, morphometric parameters of shoots and roots, chlorophyll content in leaves, plant biomass) is necessary. The results of the study can be used in the selection of initial forms for the selection of winter rye, as well as in the cultivation of the studied varieties in different agro-ecological conditions.
About the Authors
S. SalehRussian Federation
Samuel Saleh, Graduate Student
6 Volodarsky Str., Tyumen, 625003
E. A. Murygina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Murygina, Student
6 Volodarsky Str., Tyumen, 625003
N. A. Bome
Russian Federation
Nina Anatolyevna Bome, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
6 Volodarsky Str., Tyumen, 625003
References
1. Batakova O.B., Korelina V.A., Zobnina I.V. Results of selection work with grain crops in the subarctic zone of the Russian Federation. Agrarian science. 2021; (2): 63–66 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-345-2-63-66
2. Ismagilov K.R., Kayumova R.R. Stability and ecological plasticity of winter grain crops in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Agrarian science. 2024; (3): 114–118 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-114-118
3. Shen Z. Effects of Salt and Nitrogen Stress on the Growth of Winter Rye. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020; 189: 01017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018901017
4. Blumtritt T. Roggenmarkt. Roggenforum e.V. (ed.). Roggen — Getreide mit Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: DLG-Verlag. 2001; 7–13 (in German).
5. Andryushina N.N., Belous I.N., Adamko V.N., Potsepai S.N., Mameev V.V., Shapovalov V.F., Sychev S.M. Yields and grain quality of winter rye cultivated on sod-podzolic radioactively contaminated soil depending on the applied means of chemicalization. Agrarian science. 2022; (9): 98–103 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-362-9-98-103
6. Abushayeva A.R., Sadygova M.K., Abuova A.B. The influence of flour confectionery products based on flour from light-grain rye and processed products of carrots and beets on the behavioral reactions of laboratory rats. Agrarian science. 2023; (7): 138–143 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-372-7-138-143
7. Kholov Y., Nassulaeva N., Xamroqulova M., Yarashova D. Effect of soil salinity on eco-meliorative condition. E3S Web of Conferences. Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2023). EDP Sciences. 2023; 389: 04017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338904017
8. Tagaev A.M., Daurenbek N.M., Akshalov K.A., Kostakov A.K., Makhmadjanov S.P. Soil protection technologies on medium saline irrigated lands. BIO web of conferences. International Scientific and Practical Conference “AGRARIAN SCIENCE — 2023” (AgriScience2023). EDP Sciences. 2023; 66: 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236601002
9. Gaze V.L., Golubova V.A., Yanovskaya N.V., Kovtunov V.V. Osmotic stress resistance of different sorghum species affected by NaСl. Agrarian science. 2022; (10): 96–99 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-363-10-96-99
10. Belozerova A.A., Bome N.A. Study of spring wheat reaction to salinity on the variability of sprouts morphometric parameters. Fundamental research. 2014; (12–2): 300–306 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/tenezt
11. Houshmand S., Arzani A., Mirmohammadi-Maibody S.A.M. Effects of Salinity and Drought Stress on Grain Quality of Durum Wheat. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2014; 45(3): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.861911
12. Maas E.V., Grieve C.M. Spike and Leaf Development of Sal-Stressed Wheat. Crop Science. 1990; 30(6): 1309–1313. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060031x
13. Feng Z.-Z., Wang X.-K., Feng Z.-W. Soil N and salinity leaching after the autumn irrigation and its impact on groundwater in Hetao Irrigation District, China. Agricultural Water Management. 2005; 71(2): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.07.001
14. Mohammad M., Shibli R., Ajlouni M., Nimri L. Tomato root and shoot responses to salt stress under different levels of phosphorus nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1998; 21(8): 1667–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365512
15. Endris S., Mohammad M.J. Nutrient acquisition and yield response of Barley exposed to salt stress under different levels of potassium nutrition. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology. 2007; 4(3): 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326289
16. Balandrán-Quintana R.R., Mercado-Ruiz J.N., Mendoza-Wilson A.M. Wheat Bran Proteins: A Review of Their Uses and Potential. Food Reviews International. 2015; 31(3): 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2015.1015137
17. Safina R.R., Okunev R.V., Rakhmanova G.R., Garafutdinova K.R. The content of amino acids in tomato plants when using the preparations “Monosodium Glutamate” and “Aminozol” in conditions of salt stress. Agrarian science. 2023; (12): 124–128 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-377-12-124-128
18. Baranova E.N., Gulevich A.A. Problems and perspectives of genetic engineering approach to the resolving of the tasks of plant resistance to salinity. Agricultural Biology. 2006; 41(1): 39–56 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/hthidp
19. Kobylyansky V.D., Solodukhina O.V. The theoretical basis of grain fodder rye breeding for low water soluble pentosans. Agricultural Biology. 2013; 48(2): 31–39 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/pzaxlz
20. Potapova G.N., Galimov K.A., Zobnina N.L., Ivanova M.S. New varieties and peculiarities of growing techniques of the winter cereals for seeds at the Federal Budget State Scientific Institution “The Ural Scientific Research Institute”. Perm agrarian journal. 2017; (2): 48–56 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ysttdl
21. Utkina E.I., Kedrova L.I., Nabatova N.A., Psareva E.A., Parfenova E.S. Yield capacity of winter rye varieties in conditions of Volgo-Vyatsk region. Advances in current natural sciences. 2020; (1): 12–17 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ljhdvm
Review
For citations:
Saleh S., Murygina E.A., Bome N.A. Assessment of morphophysiological parameters of resistance of various varieties of winter rye to chloride salinity in laboratory conditions. Agrarian science. 2024;1(10):134-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-387-10-134-138