Analysis of the relationship between the level of qualification of workers in production and profit indicators: an economic rationale for investing in personnel training
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-388-11-30-33
Abstract
The relevance of the study of the relationship between the level of qualification of workers in the agro-industrial sector and the financial performance of enterprises is due to the need to improve the efficiency of investments in human capital. The purpose of the work is to identify the degree of influence of educational programs on the profitability of agribusiness in order to substantiate the economic feasibility of investments in personnel training. The research methodology includes a regression analysis of panel data for 150 agribusinesses for 2015–2022, supplemented by a case study of 30 industry leaders. It was found that an increase in the share of employees with specialized higher education by 1% is associated with an increase in profitability by 0.8% (p < 0.01). An increase in the average number of training hours per employee per year by 10% correlates with a 1.5% increase in profits (p < 0.05). Detailed results confirm a statistically and economically significant return on investment in human capital in the agricultural sector.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. ShmelevaRussian Federation
Anna V. Shmeleva - Candidate of Philological Sciences, Head of the Department of Methods of Teaching Russian Language and Literature.
10A Radio str., Moscow, 105005
References
1. Huffman, W. E. Human capital and adoption of innovations: Policy implications. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2020; 42(1): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13010
2. Dias, C. S. L., Rodrigues, R. G., Ferreira, J. J. Agricultural entrepreneurship: Going back to the basics. Journal of Rural Studies. 2019; 70: 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.06.001
3. Huang, J., Xu, X., Ridoutt, B. G., Lan, K., Huang, F., Li, Y., Chen, F. Strategies to reduce environmental footprints and enhance the sustainability of agricultural production in China. Nature Food. 2021; 2(10): 751–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00376-9
4. Nardi, P., Paolini, D., Alfnes, F., Ulvenblad, P. Entrepreneurship in agriculture: models and conditions for development. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 2020; 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1818537
5. Artz, G. M., Kimle, K. L., Orazem, P. F. Does the Jack of all trades hold the winning hand? Comparing the role of specialized versus general skills in the returns to an agricultural degree. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2014; 96(1): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat063
6. Gollin, D., Lagakos, D., Waugh, M. E. The agricultural productivity gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2014; 129(2): 939–993. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt056
7. Jacoby, H. G., Mansuri, G. Incentives, supervision, and sharecropper productivity. Journal of Development Economics. 2009; 88(2): 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.03.003
8. Nettle, R., Crawford, A., Brightling, P. How private-sector farm advisors change their practices: An Australian case study. Journal of Rural Studies. 2018; 58: 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.027
Review
For citations:
Shmeleva A.V. Analysis of the relationship between the level of qualification of workers in production and profit indicators: an economic rationale for investing in personnel training. Agrarian science. 2024;(11):30-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-388-11-30-33