The effect of “Butamax 200” and “Propranolol” on the productivity of broiler chickens
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-64-69
Abstract
Relevance. Contemporary poultry farming practices, often involving high stocking densities, can significantly alter the environmental conditions and dietary regimens experienced by chickens. These changes can have detrimental effects on the neurological and cardiovascular health of broiler chickens, ultimately impacting their meat yield. In response to these challenges, poultry producers are increasingly turning to pharmaceutical interventions. These medications aim to regulate cardiovascular function and metabolism, promote bone regeneration, and mitigate stress in birds. The purpose of the work is to assess the effect of “Butamax 200” and “Propranolol” on the productive qualities of broiler chickens.
Results. The dynamics of live weight and growth rates during the rearing of broiler chickens indicate the effectiveness of the use of “Butaphosphane 200” and “Propranolol” preparations. The experimental groups differed in lower feed conversion compared to the control group by 23.11% and 28.3%, respectively. The efficiency index of broiler chicken rearing was significantly higher in the experimental groups. The EIPB of the 1st experimental group was 316 units, and the 2nd experimental group was 352 units, which exceeded the values of the control analogues by 114 and 150 units, respectively.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. M. BekshenovaRussian Federation
Aigul Mayurovna Bekshenova, Junior Research Аssistant
2 Burlaki Str., Moskovsky settlement, Tyumen region, 225501
S. S. Alexandrova
Russian Federation
Svetlana Sergeevna Alexandrova, Research Associate
2 Burlaki Str., Moskovsky settlement, Tyumen region, 225501
References
1. Barinov N.D., Kalyuzhny I.I. Preparations on the basis of butafosfan and В12 vitamin in veterinary practice. Dairy and beef cattle farming. 2014; (7): 25–27 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/takwkx
2. Zharov A.V., Zharova Iu.P. Infringement of a metabolism at highly productive animals. Veterinary medicine. 2012; (9): 46–50 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/pdsmav
3. Gorelik O.V. et al. Influence of Transport Stress on the Adaptation Potential of Chicken. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2020; 10(2): 260–263. https://elibrary.ru/leezaj
4. Gorelik O.V. et al. Dynamics of Hematological Indicators of Chickens under Stress-Inducing Influence. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2020; 10(2): 264–267. https://elibrary.ru/xvhtey
5. Boysinova N., Ibragimov F., Yunusov K., Achilov O., Rasulov U. The effectiveness of using probiotics, their effect on growth and chemical composition of broiler chicken meat. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 95: 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249501013
6. Zhilochkina T.I., Egorov I.A., Andrianova E.N., Taimusova E.N. The effect of phytase and organic mineral additives in the form of L-asparaginates for productivity broiler chickens and their muscle tissue. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023; 3011(1): 020009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0165480
7. Nasimov S., Mamatova Z., Sattorov J., Safarov X., Azimova D. Effect of the use of a probiotic Innoprovet on the growth parameters of broiler chickens (Uzbekistan). BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 95: 01035. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20249501035
8. Neverova O.P. et al. Influence of a biotechnological additive on the weight growth of broiler chickens. Agrarian science. 2023; (11): 70–75 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-376-11-70-75
9. Topuriya G.M., Rebezov M.B., Zhukov P.A. Hermivit influence on efficiency and quality of broiler chicken meat. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Food and Biotechnology. 2014; 2(3): 61–69 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/snrpth.
10. Smolentsev S.Yu. et al. Study of the Effect of an Antioxidant on the Quality of Broiler Meat. Beskopylny A., Shamtsyan M., Artiukh V. (eds.). XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. Global Precision Ag Innovation 2022. Cham: Springer. 2023; 1: 1821–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_198
11. Seryakova A., Cherepanova N., Semak A., Belyaeva N., Prosekova E. The influence of various feed additives on the development of duodenal goblet cells in broilers. BIO Web of Conferences. 2024; 108: 01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202410801014
12. Nikitin I.N., Zhuravel N.A., Miftakhutdinov A.V., Rebezov M.B., Model S.P. Economic damage caused by diseases at poultry farms of the meat direction. AGRO-industrial complex of Russia. 2022; 29(4): 509–514 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.55934/10.55934/2587-8824-2022-29-4-509-514
13. Kharlap S.Yu., Loretz O.G., Gorelik O.V., Rebezov M.B., Maksimyuk N.N. The change in leukocyte indexes in assessing the impact of the stress factor. Actual problems of biotechnology and veterinary medicine. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference of young scientists. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University of Agriculture. 2017; 419–429 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/xzgikl
14. Kolesnik E.A., Derkho M.A., Rebezov M.B. Forms of degeneration of blood cells, their physiological and clinical significance, mechanisms of formation, shadows of cells in blood smears of birds. Agrarian science. 2024; (1): 65–74 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-378-1-65-74
15. Menyakina A.G., Gamko L.N., Strochenova A.I. Efficiency indicators of using acidifier when raising broiler chickens. Vestnik of the Bryansk State Agricultural Academy. 2023; (6): 52–56 (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/kliono
16. Wickramasuriya S.S. et al. Differential Effects of Dietary Methionine Isomers on Broilers Challenged with Acute Heat Stress. The Journal of Poultry Science. 2019; 56(3): 195–203. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0180072
17. Ibrahim D. et al. Effect of Dietary Modulation of Selenium Form and Level on Performance, Tissue Retention, Quality of Frozen Stored Meat and Gene Expression of Antioxidant Status in Ross Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2019; 9(6): 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060342
18. Miftakhutdinov A.V., Sayfulmulyukov E.R. Features of protein metabolism in the body of broiler chickens when using the feed additive “Peak-Antistress” in the diet. Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2020; (4): 103–110 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-57-4-103-110
19. Miftakhutdinov A.V., Sayfulmulyukov E.R., Nogovitsina E.A., Miftakhutdinova E.A. Quality and safety of broiler meat and the correction of preslaughter stress. Achievements of science and technology in agribusiness. 2020; 34(3): 71–74 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/dnlzgs
20. Imran M. et al. Lycopene as a Natural Antioxidant Used to Prevent Human Health Disorders. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(8): 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080706
21. Islam M.N. et al. Superoxide dismutase: an updated review on its health benefits and industrial applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022; 62(26): 7282–7300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1913400
22. Ahmed S. et al. Therapeutic potentials of crocin in medication of neurological disorders. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2020; 145: 111739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111739
23. Muthukrishnan S. et al. Bioactive Components and Health Potential of Endophytic Micro-Fungal Diversity in Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(11): 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111533
24. Khalil A.A. et al. Utilization of microwave assisted black cumin seed extract as hypocholesterolemic agent in albino rats. Journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences. 2021; 10(4): 536–540. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2021.10.4.536-540
25. Ushakov A.S., Sudin N.S. The influence of anti-stress additives and antioxidants on the productivity of laying hens. Feeding of agricultural animals and feed production. 2015; (10): 51–70 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ullcev
26. Chernyshkov A.S. Efficiency of use of mineral and organic additives when growing chicken-broilers. The Bulletin Donskoy State Agrarian University. 2019; (3–1): 29–34 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/npuddx
27. Turovaya A.Yu., Kade A.Kh., Uvarov A.V., Vcherashnyuk S.P., Uvarova E.A. Effect of amiodarone, verapamil and propranolol on the sympathoadrenal, serotonergic and dopaminergic systems of the medulla oblongata in rats. International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2010; 12: 29 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/mvdpxz
28. Kade A.H., Turovaya A.Yu., Galenko-Yaroshevsky P.A., Uvarov A.V., Gubareva E.A., Romanova E.I. The influence of propranolol, amiodarone and verapamil on the central cardiac rhythm dysfunctions. Fundamental research. 2010; (1): 51–56 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/lpasob
29. Simon J., Leclercq B. Fat and lean chickens: prefattening period and in vivo sensitivity to insulin, atropine, and propranolol. American Journal of PhysiologyRegulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 1985; 249(4): R393–R401. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1985.249.4.R393
30. Hatefi A. et al. The stimulation and inhibition of beta-2 adrenergic receptor on the inflammatory responses of ovary and immune system in the aged laying hens. BMC Veterinary Research. 2021; 17: 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02892-z
31. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B. Interrelation of growth indicators of commercial meat poultry stock in different periods of ontogenesis. Vsyo o myase. 2024; (2): 40–45 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-2-40-45
32. Gritsenko S.A., Rebezov M.B. Assessing the linearity of the relationships between ontogenesis indicators and the productive qualities of a commercial flock of meat cross poultry. Vsyo o myase. 2024; (3): 54–60 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-3-54-60
33. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B. Factorial dispersion of ontogenesis indicators on the productive qualities of a commercial herd of meat cross poultry. Vsyo o myase. 2024; (4): 58–64 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-4-58-64
Review
For citations:
Bekshenova A.M., Alexandrova S.S. The effect of “Butamax 200” and “Propranolol” on the productivity of broiler chickens. Agrarian science. 2024;(12):64-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-64-69