Comparison of the exterior profile of the Russian White and Tsarskoye Selo chicken breeds

Today, poultry farming is a highly efficient branch of animal husbandry, and the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) is the most common type of farm animals. Significant changes in the exterior of chickens reflect the acquired biological characteristics of the bird and are closely related to the formed direction of productivity. The article is devoted to the comparison of the exterior profiles of two domestic chicken breeds of different productivity directions: Russian White (egg), Tsarskoye Selo (meat and egg). Exterior assessment occupies an important place in the grading of breeding poultry.

As a result of the study, it was revealed that the body structure of Tsarskoye Selo chickens meets the requirements of a heavy bird with good meat qualities. In comparison with Tsarskoye Selo chickens, Russian White chickens have a more developed abdominal part, in which the egg-forming organs are located. This is confirmed by a significantly smaller difference in the pelvic width (only 0.81 cm). In addition, the Russian White breed of chickens had a high index of legginess — 53.5, compared to the index value of 21.1 for the Tsarskoye Selo breed. The index of latitudinal proportionality for the Tsarskoye Selo breed of chickens is 2 times higher (94.0), which also indicates its productivity direction (meat and egg). Detailing and specifying breeds according to exterior indicators helps in approving new breeding forms of the State Commission of the Ministry of Agriculture.

1. Wang M.-S. et al. 863 genomes reveal the origin and domestication of chicken. Cell Research. 2020; 30(8): 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0349-y

2. Lawal R.A., Hanotte O. Domestic chicken diversity: Origin, distribution, and adaptation. Animal Genetics. 2021; 52(4): 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13091

3. Fumihito A., Miyake T., Sumi S., Takada M., Ohno S., Kondo N. One subspecies of the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994; 91(26): 12505–12509. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.26.12505

4. Semenenko M., Kuzminova E., Osepchuk D., Semenenko K., Svistunov A. New integrated system for raising poultry as a factor of increasing its productivity and metabolic status. BIO Web of Conferences. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Development and Modern Problems of Aquaculture” (AQUACULTURE 2023). 2024; 84: 01061. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248401061

5. Gritsenko S.A., Rebezov M.B. Evaluation of the linearity of the relationships between the ontogenesis indicators and the productive qualities of the commercial herd of meat cross poultry. Vse o myase. 2024; (3): 54–60 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-3-54-60

6. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B. The relationship between the growth indicators of the commercial livestock of meat poultry in different periods of ontogenesis. Vse o myase. 2024; (2): 40–45 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-2-40-45

7. Larkina T.A. et al. Evolutionary Subdivision of Domestic Chickens: Implications for Local Breeds as Assessed by Phenotype and Genotype in Comparison to Commercial and Fancy Breeds. Agriculture. 2021; 11(10): 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100914

8. Korshunova L.G., Karapetyan R.V. Preservation and Monitoring of the Gene Pool of Russian Chicken Breeds. Ptitsevodstvo. 2021; (3): 9–12 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-3-9-12

9. Stolpovsky Yu.A. The concept and principles of genetic monitoring for in situ conservation of breeds of domesticated animals. Agricultural biology. 2010; 45(6): 3–8 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/nbkqyp

10. Makarova A.V., Vakhrameev A.B., Meftah I.A. Comparative characteristics of the growth and development of meategg and egg-meat chickens. Agrarian science. 2020; (11–12): 29–32 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-343-11-29-32

11. Yurochka S.S., Khakimov A.R., Pavkin D.Yu., Bazaev S.O., Komkov I.V. Review of researches and technologies applicable to digitalization of the process of assessing the exterior of meat and dairy animals. Agrarian science. 2024; (4): 114–122 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-381-4-114-122

12. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B., Vidyakin Yu.Yu. Dynamics of indicators of linear growth and physique indices of marketable young beef poultry depending on live weight at day old. Agrarian science. 2023; 1(10): 68–72 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-375-10-68-72

13. Gritsenko S.A., Belookova O.V., Rebezov M.B. Factorial dispersion of ontogenesis indicators on productive qualities of commercial poultry flock of meat cross. Vse o myase. 2024; (4): 58–64 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2024-4-58-64

14. Galpern I.L. New principles of creating domestic chicken crosses. Ptitsevodstvo. 2002; (1): 10–13 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/uxolct

15. Anisimova V., Silin E., Naumova L. Evaluation of meat chickens by growth rate and feed conversion. Ptitsevodstvo. 1999; (4): 23 (in Russian).

16. Selezneva M.S., Salina M.N., Yezhikova M.I., Popkova K.I. Dynamics of indices of body and absolute weight of broiler cross Ross 308 in the age aspect. Uchenyye zapiski Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017; (2): 56–59 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ztikmp

17. Emanuylova Z.V., Egorova A.V., Komarov A.A., Efimov D.N. New maternal line of the Cornish breed of the “Smena” selection and genetic center. lnnovative Technologies in Environmental Engineering and Agroecosystems (ITEEA 2021). E3S Web of Conferences 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2021; 262: 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126202003

18. Galpern I.L. Selection-genetic problems of development of egg and meattype poultry production in XXI century. Genetics and breeding of animals. 2015; (3): 22–29 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/unsqwz

19. Buyarov V.S., Roiter Ya.S., Kavtarashvili A.Sh., Chervonova I.V., Buyarov A.V. Assessment of breeding qualities of agricultural poultry of egg direction productivity (review). Bulletin of agrarian science. 2019; (4): 46–55 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15217/issn2587-666X.2019.4.46

20. Sokolova A.N. Genetic breeding methods for creating a population of chickens with increased resistance to neoplasms. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Agricultural Sciences. St. Petersburg. 1999; 300 (in Russian).

21. Sokolova A.N. Selection of chickens for thermoregulation function and productivity. collected papers of the XIII World Poultry Congress. Kyiv. 1966; 151–155 (in Russian).

22. Fisinin V.I., Kavtarashvili A.Sh. Heat stress in poultry. II. Methods and techniques for prevention and alleviation (review). Agricultural biology. 2015; 50(4): 431–443. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2015.4.431eng

23. Konovalova E.L. The technology of growing chickens free of infectious disease pathogens and their use in the diagnosis of viral diseases. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. Troitsk. 2002; 156 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/qdrdbj

24. Somes R.G. International Registry of Poultry Genetic Stocks. Bulletin 476. Storrs, Connecticut: Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 1988; x: 98.

25. Katerinich O.A. Comparative characteristics of chickens of different genotypes by exterior and body type indicators. Problemy sovremennoy nauki. 2014; 12(1): 81–86 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tajlqj

26. Azovtseva A.I., Shcherbakov Yu.S., Vakhrameev A.B., Dementieva N.V., Fedorova Z.L., Pozovnikova M.V. Analysis of selection progress in populations of the Tsarskoye Selo breed of chickens based on exterior data. Achievements of science and technology in agribusiness. 2024; 38(5): 21–28 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/hhgrrd

27. Egorova A.V. The exterior traits in broiler breeders. Ptitsevodstvo. 2018; (7): 9–11 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ynjukl

28. Willems O.W., Miller S.P., Wood B.J. Aspects of selection for feed efficiency in meat producing poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2013; 69(1): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391300007X