The effect of dietary supplements in spring top dressing on the fertility of queen bees and honey productivity of bee colonies

Relevance. The research is conditioned by the need to find biologically active additives of a new generation to improve the reproductive function of queen bees and increase the honey productivity of bee colonies.

Methods. The research was conducted in 2022–2023 at the experimental apiary of the Federal Scientific Center for Bast Crops of the Pskov region.

Control group I received a 40% sucrose solution as a top dressing. Experimental group II received a 40% sucrose solution with additional administration of 98.7% “Arabinogalactan” and 1.3% silver at a dose of 2 mg/kg of live weight of bees. Experimental group III received a 40% sucrose solution with additional administration of the biologically active additive “ExtraCor” at a dose of 2 mg/kg of live weight of bees. The quality assessment of natural bee honey was carried out in accordance with the requirements of GOST 19792-2001 and GOST R 52451-2005.

Results. As a result of the conducted studies, it was found that the addition of experimental dietary supplement “Arabinogalactan” (98.7%) with silver (1.3%) to a 40% sucrose solution significantly affected the increase in the egg production of queens by 12.9%, which affected the faster development of families and the yield of commercial honey, which increased by 36.8%. The addition of the biologically active additive “ExtraCor” to a 40% sucrose solution led to an increase in the egg production of queens by 13.4%, an increase in the yield of commercial honey was 32.7%.

1. Zayed A. Bee genetics and conservation. Apidologie. 2009; 40(3): 237‒262. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009026

2. Cornman R.S. et al. Pathogen Webs in Collapsing Honey Bee Colonies. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(8): e43562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043562

3. Genersch E., Evans J.D., Fries I. Honey bee disease overview. Journal ofInvertebrate Pathology. 2010; 103(S): S2‒S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.015

4. Bartomeus I., Park M.G., Gibbs J., Danforth B.N., Lakso A.N., Winfree R. Biodiversity ensures plant-pollinator phenological synchrony against climate change. Ecology Letters. 2013; 16(11): 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12170

5. López-Uribe M.M., Soro A., Jha S. Conservation genetics of bees: advances in the application of molecular tools to guide bee pollinator conservation. Conservation Genetics. 2017; 18(3): 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0975-1

6. Cameron E.C., Franck P., Oldroyd B.P. Genetic structure of nest aggregations and drone congregations of the southeast Asian stingless bee Trigonacollina. Molecular Ecology. 2004; 13(8): 2357–2364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02194.x

7. Audisio M.C., Torres M.J., Sabaté D.P., Ibarguren C., Apella M.C. Properties of different lactic acid bacteria isolated from Apis mellifera L. bee-gut. Microbiological Research. 2011; 166(1): 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2010.01.003

8. Ilyasov R., Gaifullina L., Saltykova E., Poskryakov A., Nikolenko A. Review of the Expression of Antimicrobial Peptide Defensin in Honey Bees ApisMellifera L. Journal of Apicultural Science. 2012; 56(1): 115‒124. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0013-y

9. Eskov E.K., Usharnov D.O., Yaroshevich G.S. Comparative studying of influence of biological preparations and ultra disperse seleniumon fruitfulness of queen bees. Agrarnaya Rossiya. 2012; (12): 11‒13 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/tmvlkv

10. Fomichev Yu.P. et al. Normalisation of metabolism and increase milr quality in finst colving cows during of transition period. Achievementsof science and technology in agribusiness. 2012; (8): 31‒33 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/pcybgl

11. Eskov E.K., Yaroshevich G.S., Kostrova G.A., Mazina G.S., Kuzmin A.A. Influence of bioflavonoid (dihydroquercetin) on life expectancy and physiological state of hybrids (F1) of the Italian bee population. Izvestiya of Velikiye Luki State Agricultural Academy. 2018; (3): 2‒8 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/yoqznj

12. Fomichev Yu.P., Nikanova L.A. Dihydroquercetin and arabinogalactan are natural bioregulators used in agriculture and the food industry. Topical biotechnology. 2019; (3): 279‒283 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/rqsphi

13. Nikanova L.A., Fomichev Yu.P. Use of larch bark extract in feeding pigs. Problems of veterinary sanitation, hygiene and ecology. 2024; (1): 131‒136 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.san.hyg.ecol.202401019

14. Fomichev Yu.P. The effectiveness of the complex application of the antioxidant “Dihydroquercetin” and the prebiotic “Arabinogalactan” in the cultivation of calves during the dairy period. Veterinary, Zootechnics and Biotechnology. 2021; (4): 47‒55 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202104007

15. Ivanova S.Z. et al. Flavonoid compounds of the bark of Siberian larch and Gmelin larch. Chemistry of plant raw material. 2002; (4): 5‒13 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/hwingn

16. Aminova A.L., Yumaguzin I.F., Sharifyanov B.G., Kolesnik A.B. Efficiency of using larch bark extract as a feed additive for calves. Agrarianscience. 2023; (6): 45‒49 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2023-371-6-45-49

17. DongYun Kang, Ara Seol, JeChang Oh, YoonKoo Jung, Hee Han, JooSang Chung. Analyzing the Management Characteristics of Beekeeping Households According to Their Beekeeping Types. Journal of Apiculture.2017; 32(1): 1‒9 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2017.04.32.1.1