Soils of the most productive agricultural lands of the Irkutsk region: mapping, use, assessment of the current state
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-125-132
Abstract
Relevance. The Irkutsk-Cheremkhovskaya plain, which makes up 11% of the territory of the Irkutsk region, where the main part of farmland is located, has relatively good natural and climatic conditions. The area of agricultural land in the region is 4%, in some areas — up to 48%, of which more than half (and in remote areas more than 70%) have been abandoned since the 1990s — after the “restructuring” of the state system.
The purpose of the work is to assess the state of soil fertility of used and abandoned agricultural lands.
Methods. The assessment of the soil condition was carried out according to the author’s methodology in the form of generalizing data and a system of indices of individual indicators.
Results. It was found that the soils of arable land and deposits in remote areas (Osinsky, Bokhansky etc.) have the best fertility indicators, the worst (according to the results of these studies) are the soils of the Irkutsk region. The soils of the developed part of the territory of the region (Cheremkhovsky, Bayandaevsky and Ehirit-Bulagatsky districts) are assessed mainly as “good” and “satisfactory” according to the main agrophysical and agrochemical indicators (sometimes “excellent”, rarely “unsatisfactory”). Excellent soil condition is observed in the background areas untouched by human economic activity. The soils of the arable lands used near large settlements in almost all areas require the introduction of mineral potash and phosphorus fertilizers, less often nitrogen (mineral or organic). There is a reserve of agricultural land for use in the form of abandoned land, but sometimes they need agrochemical, agrotechnical and other measures, since the soils have not yet recovered enough.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. A. BelozertsevaRussian Federation
Irina Aleksandrovna Belozertseva, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Head of the Laboratory
1 Ulan-Batorskaya Str., Irkutsk, 664033
D. N. Lopatina
Russian Federation
Daria Nikolaevna Lopatina, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Senior Researcher
1 Ulan-Batorskaya Str., Irkutsk, 664033
References
1. Lopatina D.N., Belozertseva I.A. Agricultural land of the Osa river basin: use and level of fertility. Regional geosystems. 2023; 47(3): 392–405 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7443-2023-47-3-392-405
2. Sychev V.G., Shafran S.A., Vinogradova S.B. Soil fertility in Russia and ways of its regulation. Agrokhimiya. 2020; (6): 3–13 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120060125
3. Sychev V.G., Naliukhin A.N., Shevtsova L.K., Rukhovich O.V., Belichenko M.V. Influence of Fertilizer Systems on Soil Organic Carbon Content and Crop Yield: Results of Long-Term Field Experiments at the Geographical Network of Research Stations in Russia. Eurasian Soil Science. 2020; 53(12): 1794– 1808. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120133
4. Sychev V.G. The current state of soil fertility and the main aspects of its regulation: Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019; 328 (in Russian). ISBN 978-5-907036-01-7 https://elibrary.ru/etpunh
5. Podkolzin A.I. The effectiveness of fertilizers in Stavropol agriculture. AIC: economy, management. 2000; (1): 82–84 (in Russian).
6. Ageev V.V., Esaulko A.N., Storozhenko A.Yu., Podkolzin A.I. On the issue of biologization of fertilizer systems in crop rotations. Byulleten’ Vserossiyskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta agrokhimii im. D.N. Pryanishnikova. 2003; 117: 3–5 (in Russian).
7. Shpedt A.A. et al. Soil and ecological assessment of agricultural lands in the Krasnoyarsk territory, Irkutsk region, and the Republic of Buryatia. Zemledelie. 2022; (1): 9–13 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/0044-3913-2022-1-9-13
8. Kozlova A.A., Belozertseva I.A., Lopatina D.N. Soils of Southern Cisbaikalia: Diversity and Spatial Distribution Patterns. Geography and Natural Resources. 2021; 42(1): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372821010091
9. Ubugunov L.L. Soil resources of the Republic of Buryatia, agroecological conditions and rational use. Vestnik of Buryat State Academy of Agriculture named after V.R. Philippov. 2020; (2): 35–46 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.34655/bgsha.2020.59.2.005
10. Seryshev V.A., Solodun V.I. Agro-landscape zoning of the Irkutsk region. Geography and natural resources. 2009; (2): 86–94 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ktvgzx
11. Solodun V.I. Agro-landscape zoning of the Irkutsk region. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State Agrarian University named after A.A. Yezhevsky. 2016; 215 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/xqtpvb
12. Khismatullin Sh.D. Erosion on agricultural lands of the Irkutsk region. Geography and natural resources. 1991; (4): 49–61 (in Russian).
13. Kalep L.L. To the problem of greening the agricultural land use of the Baikal natural territory. Geography and natural resources. 2003; (2): 41–44 (in Russian).
14. Pekhtereva E.A. Regulation of GMO integration in food production: the case of Canada. Russia and the contemporary world. 2023; (1): 78–94 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2023.01.05
15. Cheremisinov A.Yu., Cheremisinov A.A., Plotnikov S.A. Consolidation of irrigated soils from the effects of agricultural machines. Forestry Engineering Journal. 2013; (4): 156–160 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/rtvowl
Review
For citations:
Belozertseva I.A., Lopatina D.N. Soils of the most productive agricultural lands of the Irkutsk region: mapping, use, assessment of the current state. Agrarian science. 2024;(12):125-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-125-132