Multiple regression models for estimating the Zn content in cowʹs milk
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-153-157
Abstract
Relevance. Regular veterinary and sanitary control of the safety and quality of animal products does not imply zinc testing. Although the role and importance of this element is largely due to its quantity. At the same time, the zinc content in milk is not constant and is due to its content in soils and feeds, and the physiology of a dairy cow. After extensive studies of zinc in milk, we calculated a number of multiple regression equations to predict zinc levels based on its biochemical analysis in order to minimize costs.
Methods. The analysis of biochemical parameters of cow’s milk was performed using the MilkoScan 7 / Fossomatic 7 DC system (Denmark). Zinc was studied using an atomic absorption spectrometer with deuterium and Zeeman correction ZEEnit 650 P.
Results. The average zinc content in milk was set at 3017.7 mcg/l. The degree of influence of the biochemical analysis data on the resulting variable (Zn) showed the high importance of the variable’s fat mass fraction, freezing point and pH (p = 0.006, 0.0001, 0.00003, respectively). The equation is characterized by a high multiple correlation coefficient (0.92) and is significant according to the F-criterion = 5,41E43, the adjusted value of R2 = 0.83, which can be considered a good result. Working with regression forecasting models allows for a preliminary assessment of the zinc level in milk according to its biochemical analysis, without additional financial burden on production and better control of its content in milk.
About the Author
O. A. VoroninaRussian Federation
Oksana Alexandrovna Voronina, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Farm Animals
60 Dubrovitsy settlement, Podolsk, Moscow region, 142132
References
1. Khan I.T., Nadeem M., Imran M., Ullah R., Ajmal M., Jaspal M.H. Antioxidant properties of Milk and dairy products: a comprehensive review of the current knowledge. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2019; 18: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-019-0969-8
2. Clark S., García M.B.M. A 100-Year Review: Advances in goat milk research. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017; 100(12): 10026‒10044. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13287
3. Haenlein G.F.W. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminant Research. 2004; 51(2): 155‒163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.010
4. Silanikove N., Leitner G., Merin U., Prosser C.G. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Research. 2010; 89(2‒3): 110‒124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.033
5. Verruck S., Dantas A., Prudencio E.S. Functionality of the components from goat’s milk, recent advances for functional dairy products development and its implications on human health. Journal of Functional Foods. 2019; 52: 243‒257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.11.017
6. Olechnowicz J., Tinkov A., Skalny A., Suliburska J. Zinc status is associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid, and glucose metabolism. The Journal of Physiological Sciences. 2018; 68(1): 19‒31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-017-0571-7
7. Kim J., Lee J., Ryu M.-S. Cellular Zinc Deficiency Impairs Heme Biosynthesis in Developing Erythroid Progenitors. Nutrients. 2023; 15(2): 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020281
8. Banaszak M., Górna I., Przysławski J. Zinc and the Innovative Zinc-α2Glycoprotein Adipokine Play an Important Role in Lipid Metabolism: A Critical Review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(6): 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13062023
9. Wang C. et al. Effects of zinc sulfate and coated zinc sulfate on lactation performance, nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in Holstein dairy cows. Livestock Science. 2021; 251: 104673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104673
10. Ianni A., Innosa D., Martino C., Grotta L., Bennato F., Martino G. Zinc supplementation of Friesian cows: Effect on chemical-nutritional composition and aromatic profile of dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science. 2019; 102(4): 2918‒2927. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15868
11. Hill G.M., Shannon M.C. Copper and Zinc Nutritional Issues for Agricultural Animal Production. Biological Trace Element Research. 2019; 188(1): 148‒159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1578-5
12. Burmistrov D.E. et al. Bacteriostatic and cytotoxic properties of composite material based on ZnO nanoparticles in PLGA obtained by low temperature method. Polymers. 2022; 14(1): 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010049
13. Gudkov S.V. et al. A mini review of antibacterial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Frontiers in Physics. 2021; 9: 641481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.641481
14. Voronina O.A., Bogolyubova N.V., Zaitsev S.Yu. Mineral composition of cow milk. А mini review. Agricultural Biology. 2022; 57(4): 681‒693. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2022.4.681eng
15. Hassan A., Sada K.-K., Ketheeswaran S., Dubey A.K., Bhat M.S. Role of Zinc in Mucosal Health and Disease: A Review of Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Processes. Cureus. 2020; 12(5): e8197. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8197
16. Dubovets N.I., Kaznina N.M., Orlovskaya O.A., Sycheva E.A. Problem of zinc deficiency in a diet of the population and biotechnological approaches to its solution. Molekulyarnaya i prikladnaya genetika. 2021; 31: 147‒158 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47612/1999-9127-2021-31-147-158
17. Akimov S.S. Modeling the productivity of the dairy livestock farm. Vestnik of Russian New University. Series: Complex systems: models, analysis, management. 2022; (1): 25‒32 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18137/RNU.V9187.22.01.P.025
18. Munir N. et al. Heavy metal contamination of natural foods is a serious health issue: a review. Sustainability. 2022; 14(1): 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010161
19. Gudkov S.V. et al. Do iron oxide nanoparticles have significant antibacterial properties?. Antibiotics. 2021;10(7): 884. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070884
20. Kuramshina N. et al. Heavy metals content in meat and milk of Orenburg region of Russia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2019; 11(1): 1031–1035. https://www.elibrary.ru/zsxhdf
21. Konte A.F., Ignatieva L.P. Multifactorial regression analysis of cow body type indicators of first calf of the Black-and-White Holstinized breed of the Moscow region. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2020; (4): 226‒231 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/pohzqo
22. Katkov K.A., Skorykh L.N., Pashtetsky V.S., Ostapchuk P.S., Kuevda T.A. Mathematical methods in the breeding evaluation of small horned ruminants. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2019; 14(3): 101‒110 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-3-101-110
23. Byastinova L.M. The use of Multifactor Regression Models in Forecasting in the Agricultural Sector of Yakutia. Economy and nature management in the North. 2023;(4): 102‒110 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-8778-2023-4-102-110
24. Melnikova E. et al. Application of Genomic Data for Reliability Improvement of Pig Breeding Value Estimates. Animals. 2021; 11(6): 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061557
25. Zhou X., Zheng N., Su C., Wang J., Soyeurt H. Relationships between Pb, As, Cr, and Cd in individual cows’ milk and milk composition and heavy metal contents in water, silage, and soil. Environmental Pollution. 2019; 255(2): 113322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113322
Review
For citations:
Voronina O.A. Multiple regression models for estimating the Zn content in cowʹs milk. Agrarian science. 2024;(12):153-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-389-12-153-157