Rationale and Algorithm for Reduction of Microbial Contamination in Poultry Production
https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-393-04-46-52
Abstract
Relevance. One of the main factors affecting the safety of chilled poultry meat is the level of microbial contamination. Currently, various methods have been proposed to reduce it, but the search continues for the most effective methods, equipment and means to extend the freshness of the finished chilled product. Shelf-life issues require attention from poultry producers to ensure safety, quality and meet consumer expectations.
The purpose of the work is to reduce the microbial contamination of a chilled carcass in the conditions of industrial production of poultry meat using processing modes and a technical solution.
Methods. Bacteriological studies of washes from the carcasses of broiler chickens at different parts of the technological chain for the content of QMAFAnM before and after their treatment with a technological auxiliary based on peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide were carried out.
Results. The material is devoted to the issue of improving the quality and reducing the microbial contamination of poultry carcasses at one of the poultry processing enterprises in the Ural region. The work was carried out in 2 stages. During the first stage of work, points (sections) of the technological chain were determined: after removal (start of the process); after evisceration; at the exit from the air-droplet cooling chamber, where it was decided to install equipment for product processing, processing modes were selected for each site, taking into account the technical features at this enterprise. The effectiveness of an agent based on peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide in production conditions was assessed. It was established that the work algorithm proposed by the authors leads to a decrease in QMAFAnM in cooled carcass up to specified values.
About the Authors
T. V. Savostina
South Ural State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana Vladimirovna Savostina, Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Associate Professor
13 Gagarin Str., Troitsk, 457103
S. I. Giniyatov
“VIC Group of Companies” LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Said Ilyasovich Giniyatov, Leading Specialist of the Biological Safety Department
30137 block, 681 building Ostrovtsy village, Ramenskoye City District, Moscow region, 140125
References
1. Meinert C. et al. Food safety and food security through predictive microbiology tools: a short review. Potravinarstvo. 2023; 17: 324-342, https://doi.org/10.5219/1854
2. Rebezov M. et al. Improving meat quality and safety: innovative strategies. Potravinarstvo. 2024; 18: 523-546. https://doi.org/10.5219/1972
3. Smolnikova F.Kh., Asenova B.K., Rebezov M.B., Okuskhanova E.K. Food security systems. International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the memory of V. M. Gorbatov. 2024; 1: 172-175 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/jxzyee
4. Ilyakova A.V, Gonchar A.S., Eremeeva N.I., Demina Yu.V. Assessment of efficiency of sanitary treatment of technological equipment at meat processing industry enterprise. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2024; 103(7): 712-717 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-7-712-717
5. McSharry S., Koolman L., Whyte P, Bolton D. Investigation of the Effectiveness of Disinfectants Used in Meat-Processing Facilities to Control Clostridium sporogenes and Clostridioides difficile Spores. Foods. 2021; 10(6): 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061436
6. Galie S., Garcia-Gutierrez C., Miguelez E.M., Villar C.J., Lombo F. Biofilms in the Food Industry: Health Aspects and Control Methods. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018; 9: 898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00898
7. Kozak S.S. Prevention of toxic infections during poultry processing. Animal Husbandry of Russia. 2021; (7): 15-18 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.25701/ZZR.2021.95.18.007
8. Kozak S.S., Levin PS., Kozak Yu.A., Baranovich E.S., Salikhov A.A. Safety and quality of chilled broiler chicken meat depending on storage temperature. Moscow: Nauchnaya biblioteka. 2022. 168 (in Russian). ISBN 978-5-907672-04-8 https://elibrary.ru/hqgiia
9. Song X., Wang H., Xu X. Investigation of microbial contamination in a chicken slaughterhouse environment. Journal of Food Science. 2021; 86(8): 3598-3610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15842
10. Rouger A., Tresse O., Zagorec M. Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics. Microorganisms. 2017; 5(3): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5030050
11. Semenova A.A., Nasonova V.V., Veretov L.A., Mileenkova E.V. Extending shelf life of meat products. Vsyo o myase. 2016; (5): 32-37 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/wwyinp
12. Kozak S.S. The effectiveness of additional antimicrobial treatment of poultry carcasses. Ptitsevodstvo. 2022; (5): 64-68 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2022-71-5-64-68
13. Alghazeer R. et al. Bioactive compounds potentiation and antibacterial activities of a Petalonia fascia extract on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2024; 14(3): e11493. https://doi.org/10.55251/jmbfs.11493
14. Smaoui S. et al. Beyond conventional meat preservation: saddling the control of bacteriocin and lactic acid bacteria for clean label and functional meat products. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology— Part A Enzyme Engineering and Biotechnology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-023-04680-x
15. G. Abdel Salam Sh. et al. Bioactive components and antibacterial activity of raw and boiled Egyptian pepper. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2024; e11878. https://doi.org/10.55251/jmbfs.11878
16. Abdullaeva A.M., Blinkova L.P., Usha B.V., Udavliev D.I., Pershina T.A., Pakhomov Yu.D. Analysis of the use of bacteriophages as safe means of microbial decontamination of food products. Problems of veterinary sanitation, hygiene and ecology. 2020; (2): 220-227 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.san.hyg.ecol.202002016
17. Aleksandrov A.O., Bachinskaya V.M. Study of organoleptic and physicochemical indicators of broiler chicken meat when using disinfectant F 270 Airol. Problemynauki. 2019; (6): 103-105 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/zujdnb
18. Begdildayeva N.Zh., Akhmetsadykova Sh.N., Nurgazina A.S., Kudaibergenova A.K., Akhmetsadykov N.N. Study of the effect of probiotics on the shelf life of chilled broiler meat. The Journal of Almaty Technological University. 2023; (3): 45-51. https://doi.org/10.48184/2304-568X-2023-3-45-51
19. Alagawany M., Abd El-Hack M.E., Farag M.R., Sachan S., Karthik K., Dhama K. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018; 25(11): 10611-10618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x
20. Abd El-Hac M.E., Samak D.H., Noreldin A.E., El-Naggar K., Abdo M. Probiotics and plant-derived compounds as eco-friendly agents to inhibit microbial toxins in poultry feed: a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018; 25(32): 31971-31986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3197-2
21. Glazova N.V., Salnikov S.G., Kozak S.S. Chlorine-free technology for reducing microbial contamination and increasing the shelf life of poultry carcasses. Poultry & chicken products. 2010; (2): 54-56 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/mxqtep
22. Smaoui S. et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in meat packaging: a systematic review of recent literature. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2023; 36: 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101045
23. Gudkov S.V., Burmistrov D.E., Serov D.A., Rebezov M.B., Semenova A.A., Lisitsyn A.B. Do iron oxide nanoparticles have significant antibacterial properties?. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070884
24. Yermolenko M.V., Sanalbay Zh.K., Umyrzhan T.N. Study of the effect of refrigeration treatment modes on the duration of the poultry meat cooling process. Bulletin of Shakarim University Series: Technical Sciences. 2023; (4): 160-167 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2023-4(12)-20
25. Tunieva E.K., Motovilina A.A., Mileenkova E.V. Several aspects of quality and safety formation in sous-vide products. Vsyo o myase. 2023; (4): 18-21 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2023-4-18-21
26. Hameed A. et al. Microwave-vacuum extraction technique as a green and clean label technology: kinetics, efficiency analysis, and effect on bioactive compounds. Food Analytical Methods. 2023; 16(3): 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02437-6
27. Rebezov M. et al. Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry: a review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022; 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136639
28. Alekseeva Yu.A. et al. Modern methods for cooling raw meat. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 32098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/3Z032098
29. Nurdaulet S., Uazhanova R.U., Erzhigitov E.S. Influence on quality indicators and shelf life of radiation treated poultry meat. The Journal of Almaty Technological University. 2024; (3): 66-72 (in Kazakh). https://doi.org/10.48184/2304-568X-2024-3-66-72
30. Pustotina A.A. et al. Application of radiation technologies and identification of irradiated poultry meat. AIP Conference Proceedings. “VIII International Young Researchers” Conference “Physics, Technology, Innovations, PTI2021”. 2022; 090019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089555
31. Shcherbakov M.S., Pleshakova V.I., Leshcheva N.A. Microbiocenosis of the surface of turkey broiler carcasses after their treatment with a preparation based on peracetic acid. Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2021; (12): 156-161 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-12-156-161
Review
For citations:
Savostina T.V., Giniyatov S.I. Rationale and Algorithm for Reduction of Microbial Contamination in Poultry Production. Agrarian science. 2025;1(4):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2025-393-04-46-52
Views:
81
Email this article 