Dynamics of antioxidant system indices and lipid peroxidation products in cows with comorbid obstetric-gynecological and orthopedic pathology

In this manuscript, a pro-oxidant-antioxidant control of the effectiveness of treatment with various schemes of highly productive cows in the comorbid course of postpartum acute purulent-catarrhal endometritis and purulent-necrotic disease in the finger area was carried out.

As a result of the conducted studies, it was found that the most effective complex treatment for highly productive cows with comorbid course of postpartum endometritis and orthopedic pathology turned out to be scheme I of the experimental group, as evidenced by the general condition of the experimental animals, as well as the positive dynamics of the increase in the number of antioxidant enzymes against the background of a decrease in the amount of lipoperoxidation products in the blood serum. It was found that the complex treatment of highly productive cows according to scheme I contributes to a faster overall clinical improvement already on day 9.42±0.25 (***), the onset of sexual hunting on day 52.00±0.88 (***), and the absence of complications when compared with the basic treatment of animals of the IV experimental group. It should be noted that in blood serum samples of animals of the First experimental group, the level of POL products (DC, MDA, MSM) decreases significantly faster against the background of an increase in the AOS system (SOD, CT, GLP, OAOA) compared with other experimental groups, reaching reference values.

1. Badura R., Buczek A., Samborski Z., Szymonis-Szymanowski W., Twardon J. The effect of technopathologically limited stress factors on the fertility of cattle. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift. 1992; 99(5): 193‒194 (in German).

2. Hernandez J., Shearer J.K., Webb D.W. Effect of lameness on the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows. Journal of.the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2001; 218(10): 1611‒1614. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.218.1611

3. Lutsay V.I., Soloshenko N.Yu., Nefedov A.M., Sibirtsev V.D., Rudenko A.A., Rudenko P.A. Microbial landscape in acute purulentcatarrhal postpartum endometritis in cows. Agrarian science. 2024; (3): 66‒71 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-66-71

4. Rezac D.J., Thomson D.U., Siemens M.G., Prouty F.L., Reinhardt C.D., Bartle S.J. A survey of gross pathologic conditions in cull cows at slaughter in the Great Lakes region of the United States. Journal of.Dairy Science. 2014; 97(7): 4227–4235. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7636

5. Rudenko A., Glamazdin I., Lutsay V., Sysoeva N., Tresnitskiy S., Rudenko P. Parasitocenoses in cattle and their circulation in small farms. E3S Web of.Conferences. 2022; 363: 03029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236303029

6. Vatnikov Y. et al. Research on the antibacterial and antimycotic effect of the phytopreparation Farnesol on biofilm-forming microorganisms in veterinary medicine. International Journal of.Pharmaceutical Research. 2020; 12(S2): 1481–1492. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.164

7. Földi J. et al. Bacterial complications of postpartum uterine involution in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2006; 96(3–4): 265‒281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.006

8. Lutsaу V.I., Sibirtsev V.D., Nefedov A.M., Rudenko P.A. Level of prooxidant-antioxidant status in highly productive cows with comorbid obstetric, gynecological and orthopedic pathology. Agrarian science. 2024; (9): 34‒39 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-386-9-34-39

9. Liu Z. et al. Application of Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Bovine Epidemic Disease. Viruses. 2023; 15(6): 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15061378

10. Skovorodin E., Bogolyuk S., Yurina A. Clinical, laboratory, and morphological diagnosis of diseases in the oviducts and paraovarian structures of cows. Canadian Journal of.Veterinary Research. 2022; 86(3): 194–202.

11. Rudenko P.A. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant system activity in cats with inflammatory processes. Veterinary medicine. 2016; (10): 45–48 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/wzixjh

12. Spagnuolo M.S., Sarubbi F., Rossetti C., Grazioli G., Di Meo G.P., Iannuzzi L. Effect of dioxin exposure on several indices of blood redox status in lactating buffalo cows. Journal of.Dairy Research. 2011; 78(2): 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029911000021

13. Takahashi M. Oxidative Stress and Redox Regulation on In Vitro Development of Mammalian Embryos. Journal of.Reproduction and Development. 2012; 58(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.11-138n

14. Sies H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biology. 2015; 4: 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002

15. Van Breusegem F., Remacle C. Oxidative stress responses in plants. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2023; 204: 394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.05.012

16. Zhao B. et al. Supplementation with kaempferol relieves oxidative stress and enhances development of early bovine embryos in vitro. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2022; 57(9): 1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14167

17. Abeyta M.A. et al. Effects of dietary antioxidant supplementation on metabolism and inflammatory biomarkers in heat-stressed dairy cows. Journal of.Dairy Science. 2023; 106(2): 1441–1452. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22338

18. Lashkari S., Habibian M., Jensen S.K. A Review on the Role of Chromium Supplementation in Ruminant Nutrition-Effects on Productive Performance, Blood Metabolites, Antioxidant Status, and Immunocompetence. Biological Trace Element Research. 2018; 186(2): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1310-5

19. Gomes da Silva G. et al. Feeding reduced levels of trace minerals in proteinate form and selenium-yeast to transition cows: Performance, trace minerals, and antioxidant status, peripheral neutrophil activity, and oocyte quality. Journal of.Dairy Science. 2023; 106(4): 3023–3042. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-21939

20. Puppel K., Kapusta A., Kuczyńska B. The etiology of oxidative stress in the various species of animals, a review. Journal of.the Science of.Food and Agriculture. 2015; 95(11): 2179–2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7015