Preview

Agrarian science

Advanced search

Assessment of the effect of non-traditional cakes in goat diets on the fatty acid composition of milk

https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-388-11-62-66

Abstract

Relevance. Increasing the intake of unsaturated fatty acids, especially polyunsaturated ones, by adding oilseeds, oils or their by-products with a high oil content can positively affect the composition of fatty acids in goat milk and benefit human health.

Methods. In accordance with the scheme of the experiment, soy meal in the diets of animals of groups I and II was replaced with hemp or linseed cake in the amount of 5% and 10% of the dry matter of the concentrated part of the diet, which were fed, including together with a probiotic drug.

Results. It was found that linolenic acid (58.6%), oleic acid (20.1%) and linoleic acid (16.3%) made up a larger percentage in the composition of linseed cake, linoleic acid (53.4%) made up a large proportion in hemp cake. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of goat’s milk when feeding cakes showed that the profile of the mass fraction of 10 main fatty acids in total in the experimental groups amounted to more than 90% of all fatty acids in goat’s milk. To a greater extent, the mass fractions of monounsaturated oleic acid increased relative to the control group: when using linseed cake — by 4.5%, hemp cake — by 5.2%, respectively. In the experimental groups, lower levels of medium-chain were found in comparison with the control group (C12:0–C14:0) fatty acids. The peculiarities of the fatty acid composition of goat’s milk were found against the background of additional administration of a probiotic drug. The proportion of essential fatty acids in the experimental groups increased: with the use of linseed cake — by 1.4%, hemp cake — by 3.4%. A higher content of monounsaturated oleic (p < 0.05) and linoleic acids was found.

About the Authors

D. A. Kislova
Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Daria A. Kislova - Candidate of Biological Sciences.

29 9st January Str., Orenburg, 460000



E. V. Sheida
Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Elena V. Sheida - Doctor of Biological Sciences, Research Associate.

29 9st January Str., Orenburg, 460000



О. V. Kvan
Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Olga V. Kvan - Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher.

29 9st January Str., Orenburg, 460000



G. K. Duskaev
Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Galimzhan K. Duskaev - Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

29 9st January Str., Orenburg, 460000



References

1. Romero-Huelva M., Ramírez-Fenosa M.A., Planelles-González R., García-Casado P., Molina-Alcaide E. Can by-products replace conventional ingredients in concentrate of dairy goat diet?. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017; 100(6): 4500‒4512. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11766

2. Khan N.A., Habib G. Assessment of Grewia oppositifolia leaves as crude protein supplement to low-quality forage diets of sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2012; 44(7): 1375‒1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0074-8

3. Utaaker K.S., Chaudhary S., Kifleyohannes T., Robertson L.J. Global Goat! Is the Expanding Goat Population an Important Reservoir of Cryptosporidium? Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8: 648500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.648500

4. Paksoy N., Dinç H., Altun S.K. Evaluation of levels of Essential Elements and Heavy Metals in Milks of Dairy Donkeys, Goats and Sheep in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2018; 50(3): 1097‒1105. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.3.1097.1105

5. Pulina G. et al. Invited review: Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. Journal of Dairy Science. 2108; 101(8): 6715‒6729. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14015

6. Khan N.A. et al. Improving the feeding value of straws with Pleurotus ostreatus. Animal Production Science. 2015; 55(2): 241‒245. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14184

7. Teng F., Reis M.G., Ma Y., Day L., Effects of season and industrial processes on volatile 4-alkyl-branched chain fatty acids in sheep milk. Food Chemistry. 2018; 260: 327‒335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.011

8. Yurchenko S., Sats A., Tatar V., Kaart T., Mootse H., Jõudu I. Fatty acid profile of milk from Saanen and Swedish landrace goats. Food Chemistry. 2018; 254: 326‒332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.041

9. Nudda A. et al. Sheep and Goats Respond Differently to Feeding Strategies Directed to Improve the Fatty Acid Profile of Milk Fat. Animal. 2020; 10(8): 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081290

10. Avila-Nava A., Medina-Vera I., Toledo-Alvarado H., Corona L., Márquez-Mota C.C. Supplementation with antioxidants and phenolic compounds in ruminant feeding and its effect on dairy products: a systematic review. Journal of Dairy Research. 2023; 90(3): 216‒226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029923000511

11. Marcos C.N., Carro M.D., Fernández Yepes J.E., Haro A., Romero-Huelva M., Molina-Alcaide E. Effects of agroindustrial by-product supplementation on dairy goat milk characteristics, nutrient utilization, ruminal fermentation, and methane production. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020; 103(2): 1472‒1483. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17386

12. Meignan T., Lechartier C., Chesneau G., Bareille N. Effects of feeding extruded linseed on production performance and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017; 100(6): 4394‒4408. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11850

13. Plata-Pérez G. et al. Oilseed Supplementation Improves Milk Composition and Fatty Acid Profile of Cow Milk: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Animals. 2022; 12(13): 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131642

14. Sandrucci A., Bava L., Tamburini A., Gislon G., Zucali M. Management practices and milk quality in dairy goat farms in Northern Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2018; 18(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1466664

15. Kulmakova N.I., Lukin I.I., Yuldashbaev Yu.A., Pakhomova E.V., Prokhorova N.V. Comparative characteristics of goat milk of different breeds. Sheep, goats, wool business. 2024; (1): 36‒40 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/bftmze

16. Zoteev V.S., Simonov G.A., Kuznetsov G.B. Ginger cake in the diet of Zaanen goats. Sheep, goats, wool business. 2014; (3): 29‒30 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/rhqhxx

17. Zoteev V.S., Simonov G.A., Kirichenko A.V., Nikitin Ya.E. Efficiency of using flask in feeding highly productive goats. Sheep, goats, wool business. 2022; (1): 28‒31 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26897/2074-0840-2022-1-28-31

18. Stella A.V. et al. Effect of administration of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production, milk composition, blood metabolites, and faecal flora in early lactating dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research. 2007; 67(1): 7‒13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.024

19. Yausheva E., Kosyan D., Duskaev G., Kvan O., Rakhmatullin S. Evaluation of the impact of plant extracts in different concentrations on the ecosystem of broilers’ intestine. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2019; 9(4): 4168‒4171. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC94.168171

20. Inchagova K.S., Duskaev G.K., Deryabin D.G. Quorum Sensing Inhibition in Chromobacterium violaceum by Amikacin Combination with Activated Charcoal or Small Plant-Derived Molecules (Pyrogallol and Coumarin). Microbiology. 2019; 88(1): 63‒71. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261719010132


Review

For citations:


Kislova D.A., Sheida E.V., Kvan О.V., Duskaev G.K. Assessment of the effect of non-traditional cakes in goat diets on the fatty acid composition of milk. Agrarian science. 2024;(11):62-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2024-388-11-62-66

Views: 667


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-8155 (Print)
ISSN 2686-701X (Online)
X