Analysis of world rice production according to statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Relevance. The study provides an analytical overview of global rice production over time from 1961 to 2022 according to statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
The purpose of the study is to identify trends in the development of the global rice production market.
Methods. The empirical basis of the study was the statistical data of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The theoretical basis of the study was the works of famous Russian and foreign scientists, directly affecting various aspects of world rice production. The methodological basis of the study was the following methods: comparison, time analysis, data systematization.
Results. China and India produce more than 50% of the world’s rice. In China, there is a trend towards a decrease in the area of rice production, in parallel with an increase in yield. There are a number of countries that have enormous development potential in the rice market: Pakistan, Cambodia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia. These countries are rapidly increasing the volume of harvesting areas for this crop and increasing the efficiency of these areas due to increased rice yield per 1 hectare.

1. Aksenov I.A. Development of state support for the export of agricultural products as an element of the integration policy of the Eurasian Economic Union. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2021; 13(4): 273-296 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2021-13-4-273-296

2. Minakov A.V., Safiullin I.N., Mikhailova L.V. Development of Russian agriculture and directions for increasing its competitiveness in the international market. Bulletin of the Kazan State Agrarian University. 2023; 18: 2(70): 191-198 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-0462-2023-191-198

3. Pozubenkova E.I., Nosov A.V., Fudina E.V. The mechanism for introducing genetic technologies into agricultural production. Niva Volga region. 2021; 3(60): 17-21 (in Russian). DOI: 10.36461/NP2021.60.3.007

4. Stelmashonok E.V., Stelmashonok V.L. Digital transformation of the agro-industrial complex: analysis of prospects. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2021; 13(2): 336-365 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2021-13-2-336-365

5. Paptsov A., Nechaev V., Mikhailushkin P Towards a single innovation space in the agricultural sector of the member states of the Eurasian economic union: A case study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2019; 7(1): 637-648. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(45)

6. Nechaev V.I., Arzhantsev S.A. Concept of the development of the agricultural technological platform of the EAEU member states. Econ Russ Agric. 2018; 8: 85-92.

7. Zhilyakov D.I. The role of the state in increasing the efficiency of agricultural organizations. Economic Sciences. 2021; 194: 74-77 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.1445V1.194.74 EDN XNQUCS

8. Skvortsova T.A., Denisova I.P, Romanenko N.G., Sukhovenko A.V. Innovations and support for quality in agriculture: A case study. European Research Studies Journal. 2018; 21(1): 423-431. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1192

9. Skvortsova T.A., Nikitina A.A., Pasikova T.A., Tagaev A.V. Concepts and criteria for the classification of small and medium-sized business in Russia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 2019; 7: 417-425. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/287